Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AS V-Spec said tyres and suspension setup have the biggest effect on this. Power delivery also has a part in this but not as much as the other two factors. My toyota has less power than my skyline (226rwkw) but when i had my slightly worn dodgy pirellis on it and very stiff suspension it would snap sideways and wheel spin in 3rd on dry bitumen as soon as it came on boost at about half throttle (~3000rpm). My skyline with drag suspension rather than drift setup has a big turbo (gt3037s) and very soft falken tyres but doesn't go sideways and wheelspin when it hits boost as easily as my toyota. You can put very stiff suspension in a silvia/180 and setup camber and caster for drifting and get it to wheelspin easily in 2nd with relatively stock engine.

If you are just wanting to know how much power your car has as vspec said go to a dyno shootout or something (pretty cheap) or if you want to know how to get your car to do this just speak to a tuning shop and they should be able to advise what mods are needed.

Jamie

i have a rb20det in a siliva.. heaps of camber on the rear.. low n hard.. and if i go from first two second i get no traction what so ever in second and it wil chirp and sometimes with .8bar boost it will kick a bit sideways changing to third... with 1bar it will kick out and spin a lil more but thats with 4.3 diff gears i think.. well at 110 in 5th its about 3800!!!

lol...

i have over 200rwkw.

no loss of traction in 1st or second, if i launch smoothly and then mash it.

If i launch hard then wheelspin all the way till the top of 2nd.

I only have 225's so it does well to keep traction most of the time

but it all has to do with how you work ya clutch

With my SR180 and 195's i could wheelspin at 110km/h for as far as i wanted in the dry (i got a fine on the highway within 20mins of driving with those tyres :( ). Tyres make a phonomenal difference i had 2 difference sets of 235's, once were pathetic and would spin for a fair bit when i shifted into 3rd, while the others would just twitch and hook up well.

To answer your original question i would say 220rwkw with a stockish suspension/tyres setup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...