Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No.

take the boost controller out. put it back on actuator. and re-test. report back results please.

Ok will do, but out of curiosity wont the mixture be out of wack and tuned to 12 p? Will puting it to the actuator put it down to stock 7p ?

Also, do i keep the solonoid hoses blocked? Wat should i do with the hoses apart from running the cooler hose to the actator?

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok will do, but out of curiosity wont the mixture be out of wack and tuned to 12 p? Will puting it to the actuator put it down to stock 7p ?

Also, do i keep the solonoid hoses blocked? Wat should i do with the hoses apart from running the cooler hose to the actator?

your ecu is NOT programable. changing the boost will not effect anything. there is no way to tune your ecu so please ignore this its not tuned business because its not tunable.

Your tuner did not tune the car to 12psi or any boost level. if he said this then he probly did because he was charging you extra money and needed an excuse for it.

report back with results

as much as i would love a new ecu i dont want to go that path as they are not legal

Then look into a daughter board.

it goes into your ECU box.

Toshi or dr drift maybe has these?

Also, EMU's like gready emanage uses your stock computer as well, just hide the emanage or something.

Your a member of vic SAU, so talk to them an see how they go about tuning their computers.

The stock computer is so stupidly out of tune at 12 PSI that putting it back to stock PSI will improve the tune if anything.

Ok, wat do i do with the hoses wat is the stock setup?

And i dont hav the hose with the little ball restricter, does this matter? or will not having the restricter bring it to 10 pound?

ok i took it for a spin with no controller etc

doing the exact same thing!

the hoses are fine theres no leaks etc, any specific hoses i should check on the engine?

im getting the intercooler pressure tested next week to see if its that to

:(

ok i took it for a spin with no controller etc

doing the exact same thing!

the hoses are fine theres no leaks etc, any specific hoses i should check on the engine?

im getting the intercooler pressure tested next week to see if its that to

:)

you need to give me more information. what is it doing?!?

explain. the "same thing" is not good enough. I aint going to help you if you are not going to give me proper feedback.

up to you.

Well it gets to .5 bar and pauses for a second at around 5k rpm and starts creeping, it got to .7 bar before i pulled off, couldve gone more, felt the same roughness, it also had this strange power boostwene it was past .5 bar....

what exhaust system are you running? mainly cat converter and dump pipe... also if you've got access to a reulator and compressor, check to see if the diaphram in your actuator hasnt gt a slght split/crack/leak, do this by connecting hose to actuator from compresser and very slowly start putting pressure into it and you should see the arm move and open the flap on the turbo.

Well it gets to .5 bar and pauses for a second at around 5k rpm and starts creeping, it got to .7 bar before i pulled off, couldve gone more, felt the same roughness, it also had this strange power boostwene it was past .5 bar....

ok now. leave the line connected how it was when you did this test.

Do the test again

Next time dont back off untill it goes over 1 bar. if it does go over one bar. report back with results. and be acurate with results again please.

ok i took her for a spin tonight, i took it easy in 1 and 2, 3 i floord it, it when normaly to .5kpa and paused there for a sec, then it started to creep slowley toward 1bar, now heres the thing, it got to 1bar and stopped, then came back to .9bar and sat then i backed off, when it got to 1bar i was doing about 130 so i backed off. so it wont go over 1bar and will come back to .9bar as soon as it gets to 1bar.

i wasnt really looking at the taco at the time but i never reached the rev limiter, so i think it got to 1bar at around 6k

Id say start from scratch. Remove the stock solonoid (the thing in your pic where u have one hose blocked off and the other hose comes from the BOV return/plumback Line). Get rid of it, and block off the hose from the bov return line.

Run a boost line from part of your intercooler piping on the high pressure side of the turbo to your actuator.

I got the impression from one of your posts that you have a dump pipe that has a wastegate flap built into it, meaning you have 2 wastegate flaps (1 on the turbo and 1 on the dump pipe).... i believe i misunderstood this as you trying to explain that u have a bellmouth dump pipe that is one pipe from your exhaust wheel and wastegate flap rather then a seperate pipe from your wastegate flap that joins into the exhaust later.

I know people have already suggested to run a line from ur pipework directly to ur actuator. but Im just saying get rid of all the crap thats in there so you just have the basic one line.

See how u go :(

mine was doing the same thing at the beginning of the year after i put on my high flow. just wanted to go to 17 psi no matter what i did. ended up being that the tune was to rich and over boosting. to fix i put in a 2 1/4 " restriction plate in and a re tune with a SAFC2. only goes to 11 psi now.

was it doing it before you decatted?

Edited by Pal

Pal

its the stock ecu so i dont know if it can run rich?

i cant remember if it was before i decatted, ive ordered a catco cat so we will soon see!

Boostin96

the solonoid is all blocked off at the moment, theres a pipe to the lower hole but its blocked aswell, all the hoses are done as you suggested.

i have a bellmouth yes, its just a one bit 3 inch pipe to the back of the turbo, but when i had a split pipe in, it was also doing this.

you say, remove all the crap in there so its just one pipe? but at the moment i just have the one hose from the cooler piping to the actuator, i dont think it can get any simpler lol

i still recon its down to the tune. as far as i know the stock computer runs rich and with all the other stuff on there and running rough at the top end will be the r&r. need to get yourself a tunable computer or get yours chipped.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...