Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how do you guys who use two tensioners go about mounting the lower tensioner without it sitting at an angle, I was thinking fill up some weld on the block and make it smooth. the reason i want to use two tensioners is because with two tensioners you can have the right belt tension and not have either of the tensioners fould on the case without cutting into it. I was also thinking of cutting a notch into the base of the tensioner so it clears what im assuming to be an oil gallery but then it would site back a few mil,

any input is appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/273393-another-timing-belt-question/
Share on other sites

ok well ive been looking into it more and found a few pics of rb30's rb25's and rb26's where there is a machined surface where the idler normally goes (where i want to mount my lower tensioner) but mine is not a machined flat surface, its got the hole with a thread in it for the idler, but yeh my engine has already gone together, any idea's on what i can use or do

Hey there buddy..

i was in the same boat a few weeks ago! I had forgotten to sort it when the block was stripped too so it was even worse..

here is what I did:

I measured how far out the surface of the block need to come to meet level with the other tension position. then I got a large flat washer of the appropriate thickness and diameter and using some metal paste bonded it to the block using a a bolt to align it to the existing hole and another flat washer to try and get it bonded somewhere near square. I used paste as 1) my block is built and didn't want to start welding it. 2) I think welding cast is a bit of a trick from what I have heard!

At this point if your block is not built then you can throw it up on a mill and mill over the washer to get the height and flatness perfect. Alternatively I made a 10mm pilot shaft which I screwed into the block and then turned up a bar with a nuts on 10mm reamed hole through it to locate on the pilot shaft and OD to match the washer. I then made an attachment to fit the block into a hand drill and mounted some coarse grit wet and dry to the end of the block.. Slide the block over the shaft and sand away until you get a shiny clean sand surface all around your washer.. Then it's square! Job done!

I will try and post picks later if you need as I have not got around to doing a build thread yet.

Good luck

Lee

pics would be great, kinda good to see im not alone on this lol, its not in the car yet but its built and sitting on the engine stand at home, I was thinking alnong the same lines but getting a thick washer and trimming the washer to sit nice and flat around the hole, then get it welded to the bottom of the tensioner, i realize that after ive done this i wont be able to adjust the tensioner but it wont matter if i get it where i want it, then the adjustment can be made through the top tensioner, and yes it did take me ages to sleep last night with this going through my head

Edited by s13_Skyline_inside

I've made a 10mm plate which bolts to the original tensioner and 6mm stud holes then cut 10mm off the back of the tensioner and bolt it to the hole on the exhaust side of the belt. I have a cad drawing of it here somewhere I could post up if you like. This is to use with the top mount tensioner setup.

i am using a high mount tensioner and a low mount so i can fit them behind the covers without cutting them, as it stands at the moment i cant mount a idler or a tensioner in the lower position, would be great to post the cad pics but i wouldnt know what to do with them :P would be worth a look though.

I was thinking of using some of the epoxy metal stuff, cant rember what the real name of it is though, comes in a tube like a Plasticine, getting a threaded dowel, screwing it into the block, wrap some tin foil around it or lube it up with some vaso so the epoxy doesnt stick to it, have a large washer and a nut, anyway put the epoxy around the dowel to cover an area big enough to mount the tensioner on, then screwing the nut and washer down to the right height so it creates a flat surface on the epoxy, let it set then screw the dowel out and then screw a bolt through the tensioner, hardened epoxy and into the block.

this should work as long as the hardened epoxy can stand up to the engine heat an oil if any gets on it. I'll have to read up on it at work tomorrow.

ok i sorted it, read up on the epoxy and it can withstand up to 170 degree's C, HSN timing belt that the rb's use can withstand up to 130 degree's C so im sure it would be fine to use, but I didnt use it cause i wasnt sure about the heat till i got home and referenced of the timing belt box. Anyway what I did was use three large washers, cut just into the hole on two of them and then the last one stayed whole which came to the perfect hight and was flat against the block.

just thought I'd say what I did with the situation incase anyone else does a search with the same problem, thanks for the input leeroy and pro engines, helped with my thoughts :thumbsup:

oh and by using two tensioners i can get a good belt tension and still fit it all behind the covers without modifying them, now to make up a fibreglass plate to cover the hole so i can make the 3ltr conversion a bit less obvious

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...