Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats a fair call, but the injector duty cycle has no idea what the fuel rail pressure is, and that can account for why the A/F ratios being ok, as the ECU doesnt have any closed loop mechanism on the duty cycle does it? I mean it doesnt retard boost etc when duty cycle gets over say 95%.

Duty cycle is displayed purely as a tuning aid, and as long as A/F are ok on the dyno's sensor/readout then all is ok.

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Roy, Yes that's true, and I think it is how all of the aftermarket ECU's work. The increased fuel pressure is allowing us to push further than most people, but there are some who are using Wolfs and getting 350rwhp with no rising rate regulator.

Rightyo... i knew i saw it someplace.

Im back with some actual calculations (hope the are the right ones or me gonna look silly) :(

From RS500 - He helped me at one stage before.

Use this as a rule of thumb when working out fuel/hp delivery from injectors.

HP = cc per min / 5

therefore,

HP = 370cc / 5 = 74hp per injector

Now this in Engine we are talking about dont forget...

74 x 6 = 440hp (330kw) So you can make 440 HP at the motor end of things wth stock injectors (agreed?)

You are making 431hp at the wheels... Not at the engine.

And just a rising rate reg has got you that far?

To continue this good discussion, does anyone know the loss of power from motor to wheels in an R33 ?

If so... please provide and i'll go away and do some more sums.

Dont shoot me if my calculations are wrong... i've tried to make sure the numbers are right.

By all means correct if i am wrong

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Nismoid, I'm not sure if you'll get a definate answer on the drivetrain losses, you'll get answers from 15-30%.

Yeah i know... I usually go 20-30%

Maybe someone out there has..........

Engine dyno'd the car, then had it on a chassis soon after by chance?

Asking a bit much but you never know.

Hi R31Nismoid, it has been our experience that a standard R33 GTST looses about 60 to 65 kw through the drive train on Dyno Dynamics roller dyno. Remembering that the 431.6 was rhhp (rhhp = on hub dyno) which seem to loose about 10 to 15 kw less than a roller dyno. Thus confirming the 411 rwhp previously reported.

So 431.6 rhhp (or 411 rwhp) would be around 500 bhp (bhp = at the engine).

Hope that enables R31Nismoid to finish the calculations.

Hi GTS-t VSPEC, "you asked how were you able to calculate the drivetrain losses?"

I didn't calculate them, it is real data built up from experiences on our dyno from over 20 Skylines. Many of which were standard when they first went on the rollers. The only assumption is that Nissan quote accurate engine kw figures for GTST's. Of course they don't for GTR's, they are all understated to comply with the 206 kw gentlemen's agreement.

Plus we have run a couple of engines on the engine dyno and then ran them up on the chassis dyno. This confirmed the relativity of the standard Nissan power figures for the GTST's.

I have also back to back tested our Dyno Dynamics (roller) with a Dynojet (hub) on the same day using the same car. Free demo as they were trying to sell us one, nearly bought it too.

So no guesses here, real world experiences and factual data, you can't run a circuit race team any other way.

Hope that clarifies

Gtst-Vspec: How far are you going to try and push your car?? I believe the stock rods start break once your over the 450rwhp mark. Pretty figures you have there. But could you please answer my question to "What is the size of your exhaust housing on the GT30. Is .82??".

Thanks

Harun

Good luck with getting that figure. Should be awesome to drive.

My old turbo was a .82. With 1.7bar it made 421rwhp. I know of many other skylines using a similar turbo to my old one that make similar powers at similar boost levels. I just dont seem to understand how you are able to make more power with less boost & standard injectors. I should come for a drive your way.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi  R31Nismoid, it has been our experience that a standard R33 GTST looses about 60 to 65 kw through the drive train on Dyno Dynamics roller dyno.  Remembering that the 431.6 was rhhp (rhhp = on hub dyno) which seem to loose about 10 to 15 kw less than a roller dyno.  Thus confirming the 411 rwhp previously reported.

So 431.6 rhhp (or 411 rwhp) would be around 500 bhp (bhp = at the engine).

Hope that enables R31Nismoid to finish the calculations.

I'm back ;) Ok, what i have is this. 500Hp.

The figures inputted are in Bold.

HP = Xcc / 5 = hp Per injector.

HP = 417 / 5 = 83 hp Per Injector

So the stock injectors are being pushed to 417 cc per injector.

Now this is where i get buggered, i think the increase is 11.3% per injector (which is across all injectors).

Correct me on the percentage if i am wrong. I cant remember how to work it out :confused:

So that's the math part done, correctly i hope :)

ash

I got 112.7% for the injectors, divide 417 by 370 and multiply by 100. BUT

If the 417 is at 90% duty cycle (which I think? Paul mention the injectors were at), 100% would be 463 which is 125% approx of the 370cc injectors (remebering that 370 is 100% of the stock injectors)

IF my maths is right.

Originally posted by Steve

I got 112.7% for the injectors,  divide 417 by 370 and multiply by 100.  BUT

Oh... i forgot the multipy by 100... poo!

But though... it's a 12-13% increase over stock at the end of the day. i did a round off there steve ;)

Is there agree-ance there on that then?

As you already start with 100% ability to use the injectors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...