Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm wondering if there is any benefit to increasing the rev limit to around say 7500 on a R33 GTS-t with stock internals. I'm mainly asking this because GTS-t VSPEC's car makes its peak power at 7200rpm, so I would have thought that there would be some benefit to increasing the redline if tuned properly. Will it significantly shorten the life of the engine to add on another 500rpm?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/27408-increasing-rev-limit/
Share on other sites

Guest RedLineGTR

usally the stock turbo on a skyline is small since its good for spooling down below it usally runs out of puff when it get to maybe 7000rpm or about less depends on what mods u have etc but get your car on the dyno and see how the power graph turns out. UNless u have a aftermarket turbo it usally dosent do much.

Well, I have the aftermarket turbo already :) It's an old T04E though, so I'm not sure if that would run like crap past 7000rpm. The only real advantage of it over the stock item is the boost can safely be increase well past 14psi due to the steel wheels. Probably 18psi or so. It supposedly flows 450hp according to the previous owner but without the specs it's impossible to confirm.

I can always experiment with different tuning once my PowerFC arrives, I guess my primary concern was on engine reliability.

JimX, I have my redline set at 7500, and tend to make peak power around 7200rpm, and don't get much drop off in power after that. Most stock GTS-t's tend to drop off quite alot after about 6900rpm, but after I change a few things to my air-flow setup, including the Greddy plenum (await's Sydneykids flamming) the power doesn't drop off nearly as much.

I've had the 7500 limit for over 6months now and even with 400+rwhp is hasn't killed the pistons. My advice is once you have the PowerFC in then check to see if the power drops off, if it doesn't then you can push the limiter out a bit further.

JimX, I think Merli has been tuning his with 8000rpm limit and running around like that for a while - he doesnt run out of puff, but has a different turbo (HKS 3040) and cams.

I believe that where a car makes peak power can be influenced by alot of things, cams, turbo, manfold, plenum etc Just depends on your setup and what works well with what you have.

I hope to be tuning my car properly soon (getting bits fitted), and will be trying 7500 and maybe 8000 redline - just for shits and giggles, so I will let you know how it goes then.

Busky2k, good point. I'm guessing that a variable rev limit (ie, dropping it back below 7000 if held for more than a second or 2) isn't something a PowerFC is capable of doing? Not that I want to do burnouts :)

sewid, I found on the weekend when running with a PFC that my tacho was about 10% high, I thought the stock limit was 7200 as well, but its actually 7000.

As for raising the rev limit, you need to get a dyno graph, convert from speed to revs, and then calculate the range you need for each gear. It would be unusual for a stock gtst to make peak power over 6500rpm, and the important figure is the average power over the rev range you will need to use.

Originally posted by Duncan

....

It would be unusual for a stock gtst to make peak power over 6500rpm, and the important figure is the average power over the rev range you will need to use.

I would have to disagree, a good setup, from what I have seen will make power well past 7000rpm.

My car has 7200 rpm redline (from power fc) and it pulls all the way, torque doenst even drop off - still heaps to come and its only a 'quick' tune until the cams and headgasket get fitted.

Originally posted by Steve

I would have to disagree, a good setup, from what I have seen will make power well past 7000rpm.  

My car has 7200 rpm redline (from power fc) and it pulls all the way, torque doenst even drop off - still heaps to come and its only a 'quick' tune until the cams and headgasket get fitted.

Sure, to clarify I mean a stock gtst. Changing zorst, intake manifolds, computer would certainly allow you to change the power curve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...