Automatic R33 Gts-t Vs Type R Integra Dc2

[AutoRocket]

What is faster out of these two? I think the R33 will still be faster even if it is a automatic.

[eeiko321]

i think the Intergra Type R would be quicker off the mark

due to its light weight...

[GTRsean]

A stock DC2 type R will do a quarter mile in the high 14's....

[GTR-32U]

correct me if I am wrong but a Dc2 Aus spec ran a 15.1 for the 400. Only the jap spec which made a little more power ran 14.9-15.0. Not too sure what an auto GTST will run the 400 in...Manuals run it in the mid to low 14's....Would be a close one that is if both are 100% stock

[typevu]

The DC2R would pwn it through the hills.

[noobcake]

lmfao.. what are the chances. i use to have an auto non turbo r33. i got raped. but trust me now. i got a r33 manual gts-t..... THEY RAPE VTEC. LOL

[GTR-32U]

The DC2R would pwn it through the hills.

Yes I agree, One thing the Hondas got right was the whole handling and response package. Easily capable of annoying big dollar euro cars through a winding road

[eeiko321]

Yes I agree, One thing the Hondas got right was the whole handling and response package. Easily capable of annoying big dollar euro cars through a winding road

well the DC2 0 - 100 was recorded at 6.7sec

thats pretty awsome for a Non turbo 4cyl.......

the only problem with them is there is no feeling of torque watsoever...

the constant reving & the comparison of the noise its making per its velocity.......it feels like a worn clutch

[KamikazeNinja34]

And being front wheel drive isnt necessarily in their favour either, is it?

[eeiko321]

And being front wheel drive isnt necessarily in their favour either, is it?

yes

apparently Front engine...Front wheel drive is actually more superior compared to the Front engine rear wheel drive in conditions with snow, mud, gravel and wet tarmac.

[GTRsean]

And Gtr's are useless for traction in any of the above conditions too LOL!!!!

[GTR-32U]

well the DC2 0 - 100 was recorded at 6.7sec

thats pretty awsome for a Non turbo 4cyl.......

the only problem with them is there is no feeling of torque watsoever...

the constant reving & the comparison of the noise its making per its velocity.......it feels like a worn clutch

Mmmm...That must be the jap spec times ( 147 kw as opposed to Aus spec 141 kw- Jap spec had better rubber too ) as I am pretty sure most testers in the day achieved 0-100 in 7 and a 400 mtrs in 15.1...But you are right,very respectable numbers for an NA 1.8 front wheel drive

[eeiko321]

And Gtr's are useless for traction in any of the above conditions too LOL!!!!

and so is the Bugatti VEYRON are also usless for traction in any of the above conditions too LOL!!!!

the Title was talking about an AUTO GTS-T and an Integra Type-R

[Johnny]

Im for the r33 simply cos the combo of torque and an auto gearbox is full proof for drag racing while the teg would require careful rev and clutch control for a proper launch.

on another note, fabulous cars though! both of them

[Mayuri Krab]

I'll depends on the driver, if the driver for the Type-R is skilled in launch & gear changes then Type-R probably tiny bit faster. But if you talking about average day people then auto GTS-T will probably own, as said above auto boxes are easy to do drags with & you get perfect shift everytime.

[Stol]

The gtst for sure, if 33 has a shift kit the gtst by a lot more. When i was running 8 psi and my mate was running 11 psi i used to beat him every time our cars had almost the same mods except i had a shift kitted auto and he had a manual (all tests were performed on private roads...).