Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is from the metal cat site, so its hardly unbiased, but its a start.

"This especially holds true to the Magic , 'Xforce' and other 'new brands that continually enter the market under aspiring 'New Name Brand' companies. Why not as an exercise call them and ask them to fax you through their EPA/CARB/Euro test results from manufacturing factory?

UPDATE : Credit to Xforce , they have now deemed their cat ‘For Race Use Only’ . "

my r33 had a melted and collapsed metal cat. had only done about 10000k's with the cat in there.

Made the car run really badly and wouldnt boost at all. took me ages to find out it was the cat...

What exactly is wrong with ceramic cats?

I think there are limitations with what you can do with the material - they have to run finer air low passages and therefore flow less. If you look at the 200 cell metal substrate cats the holes that the air flows through are relatively big. On the ceramic i've seen the holes look like pinholes. I'd guess ceramic it too brittle to be made as thin as metal.

my cat got filled up with shit (thinking due to a rich running motor not allowing it to work properly), then kinda melted back towards the back half of the shell, hence me having to bash it out. Dunno if it was a highflow or what, but I'm sceptical about buying another one cause I don't want to be replacing them on a regular basis!

this topic confirms what I was told.. if you have a high powered RB - and especially do track days - then there is no

good cat solution and when they go bad it might not be immediately obvious they have gone bad.

basically none of them can withstand sustained blasts of 800 degree exhaust for long.

What exactly is wrong with ceramic cats?

Absolutely nothing.

As long as the cat decent quality and well made, and is suitable for the level of tune of the car in question, they are fine.

They may not be suitable for heavily modified or heavily fueled cars - For applications like this you would probably want to look towards a metal cat (ie Catco)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...