Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll ask the QUESTION for all those like me on there P's; what are the differences between the RB N/A's and the RB Turbos?

also this i think is covered in another topic but what are the costs and rewards of turbo-ing later.

Unless some one is hiding something from me the main engines we have are the 2.0L (N/A Only), the 2.5L Turbo & N/A and the 2.6L Twin Turbo.

We should focus on the 2.5L (or cc).

Other than the Turbo What are the differences?

Things like fuel line size (if you can put what the N/A's are and the turbos). Also it's Important we put what car it was in IE a R31, R32, R33, R34.

I'm trying to establish what is the better option, buying a N/A and then in a year or so upgrading it to a turbo.

Also some advice, I'm looking at a R34 25GT-X 4-Door (if i can find one) for its AWD, if not just a R34 GT-25

PS Some one might like to redo this once we finish as a sticky.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/
Share on other sites

well as with any turbo motor, it has lower compression than the NA version. this means that down the track to turbo the NA motor isn't just a case of bolting a turbo and all the piping on. you then become limited as to what boost you can run without decompressing the head (due to the extra heat from the higher compression). the advantage of turboing a NA motor though is the fact that it will come on boost earlier due to the higher compression, and have more low down power.

also, i know that with the earlier model skylines, but not sure about the r34's, the brakes are bigger/better/more powerful on the turbo versions, and i think some of the NA versions aren't limited slip diff.

fuel line size is probably the same, but fuel pump and injectors may be different (honestly don't know for sure)

the way the prices of NA's are at the moment compared to turbo versions, it would probably be a fair bit cheaper to sell your NA when you get off your p's and just buy a turbo version as everything such as drivetrain, etc is designed for the extra power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4680615
Share on other sites

Covered in an out many times through various threads.

Refer the how to turbo N/A thread, and my sticky with power results which I also encourage people to post up the costs to be able to compare. As a forum we've already accumulated quite a lot of resource for the N/A+turbo conversions.

The biggest difference as far as engine goes is the compression and type of pistons. R34's also have a variable length manifold. Exhaust size, injector sizes, fuel pump are also different. Brakes and suspension also differ on N/A unless you get a GT-V which has Turbo Model brakes and suspension as far as R34 goes. R33 obviously 4 stud vs 5 stud.

If you want to sticky a be all and end all resource for N/A vs Turbo for all these things, I would suggest a table with a collumn for each specific model (eg. R34 25GT, R34 25GT Sedan, R34 GTX, R34 GTV, R33 GTS, R33 GTS4, and there are quite a number of variances between models), then down the left you would have all your criteria. Most of this information as far as brakes, wheel sizes etc.. can be found from Nissan resources, things like injector capacity and type would be useful for future resource.

Most conversions if not transplanting the engine, are a case-by-case scenario anyways. I'm yet to see two RB25DE+t conversions that are exactly the same. Even on the R34 with the NEO engine, DORI34 had a blanking bolt for oil feed whereas DE NEO's typically don't.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4680624
Share on other sites

well as with any turbo motor, it has lower compression than the NA version. this means that down the track to turbo the NA motor isn't just a case of bolting a turbo and all the piping on. you then become limited as to what boost you can run without decompressing the head (due to the extra heat from the higher compression). the advantage of turboing a NA motor though is the fact that it will come on boost earlier due to the higher compression, and have more low down power.

also, i know that with the earlier model skylines, but not sure about the r34's, the brakes are bigger/better/more powerful on the turbo versions, and i think some of the NA versions aren't limited slip diff.

fuel line size is probably the same, but fuel pump and injectors may be different (honestly don't know for sure)

the way the prices of NA's are at the moment compared to turbo versions, it would probably be a fair bit cheaper to sell your NA when you get off your p's and just buy a turbo version as everything such as drivetrain, etc is designed for the extra power.

R34 25GT Sedan, 25GT Coupe and 25GTT are all different for brakes.

For example, my R34 25GT Sedan had 280mm Front Discs with 2 pot calipers and 265mm Rear Discs with 1 pot calipers. Brake lines also different. Good news though was that I was able to modify them to fit GTSt calipers, custom lines and the larger discs without changing the hubs.

I believe R34 GTV has LSD?

Injectors are high capacity on turbo models. Also R34 has top feed R33 has side feed.

To the OP, My advice also is to get a turbo model to begin with, unless the high compression low boost setup appeals to you. If you're chasing large amounts of reliable power then a GTT is probably the best way to begin.

N/A+t conversions are great for those who want to run the high compression low boost, or for those who have an N/A skyline that have done wheels, tyres, suspension, brakes, and a number of other things that would warrant more loss than gain when selling.

If you want a 4 Door R34 then it's definitely worth shopping around for a GTV. The fact that you get turbo model brakes and suspension makes life a hell of a lot easier when it comes to getting replacement parts (take it from me, it's partially the reason for my brake upgrade), having bigger turbo model brakes = win! It's virtually a GTT but with an N/A motor and would make a great starting base if you plan to N/A+t or engine transplant later as the turbocharged engine is pretty much all what holds it back from being a GTT. I wish I'd tried to get one to begin with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4680647
Share on other sites

here are a few links to get you started, it has been covered thoroughly before, but a sticky would be a nice addition to the N/A section

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Si...amp;hl=na+turbo

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...amp;hl=na+turbo

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Di...amp;hl=na+turbo

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Tu...amp;hl=na+turbo

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Di...amp;hl=na+turbo

these and many more came up from a search of just the words "na turbo" in the titles of topics, there are heaps more.

I also plan to get an R34 4 door GT-Four next year (all money from the last 2 years has gone into a European Holiday so car plans are on hold), but I wont buy the car until i can afford the car, a Stagea AWD RB25det Neo motor, some aftermarket management, suspension and brake upgrades all at the same time. However if i didnt want an AWD sedan, i would have just bought a GT-T and not gone down the path of turbocharging an NA R34.

edit: to anwer ur 2nd question...no, removing your turbo doesnt mean you can drive your car on your P's. Your car is still in the system as an R34 GT-T witch in the eyes of the police/gov is a turbo car, regardless of if the turbo is removed or not.

Edited by Kranker
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4680669
Share on other sites

R34 25GT Sedan, 25GT Coupe and 25GTT are all different for brakes.

For example, my R34 25GT Sedan had 280mm Front Discs with 2 pot calipers and 265mm Rear Discs with 1 pot calipers. Brake lines also different. Good news though was that I was able to modify them to fit GTSt calipers, custom lines and the larger discs without changing the hubs.

I believe R34 GTV has LSD?

Injectors are high capacity on turbo models. Also R34 has top feed R33 has side feed.

To the OP, My advice also is to get a turbo model to begin with, unless the high compression low boost setup appeals to you. If you're chasing large amounts of reliable power then a GTT is probably the best way to begin.

N/A+t conversions are great for those who want to run the high compression low boost, or for those who have an N/A skyline that have done wheels, tyres, suspension, brakes, and a number of other things that would warrant more loss than gain when selling.

If you want a 4 Door R34 then it's definitely worth shopping around for a GTV. The fact that you get turbo model brakes and suspension makes life a hell of a lot easier when it comes to getting replacement parts (take it from me, it's partially the reason for my brake upgrade), having bigger turbo model brakes = win! It's virtually a GTT but with an N/A motor and would make a great starting base if you plan to N/A+t or engine transplant later as the turbocharged engine is pretty much all what holds it back from being a GTT. I wish I'd tried to get one to begin with.

The N/A R34 25GT doesn't have LSD?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4681041
Share on other sites

A&J

I'm gonna sound like the judges on SYTYCD here critiqueing (?) dancers who think they're great when they really aren't.

I've noticed that your a P plater, thats fine but what do you currently own or what have you owned/driven previously?

Also, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that this is the first time you've had anything to do with Skylines, isn't it? It's either that or you haven't searched this site/researched jap imports or skylines in general.

Lastly, do you have a manual or auto licence.

I ask these questions because the main outcome your looking to get from your original post has been asked a fair few times before as myself and heaps of others have contributed to those threads. Honestly a simple search e.g. Kranker's reply above, would've found you all the info your looking for.

Your future car of an AWD 25GT-X 4door doesn't exist. A 25GT-X 4door does but not in AWD. If you looking for an AWD 4door R34 then you should be looking for a 25GT-4.

You'll see in below my avatar that I have a GT-V sedan and i'm not the only one on this site who has a GT-V, sedan or coupe. I'm sure i speak for most of the GT-V owners out there(not all, most) in that having the 'V' makes life so much easier when it comes to upgrading brakes, suspension etc due to it being built a turbo-spec car but without the turbo engine.

If you do a search for GT-V I've posted links before to sites that have the tabled info on the R34 models. Sort of what Nathan mentions above. Since an R34 is what your looking to get.

The reason I ask what transmission your licence states is because if you have a manual licence and a looking for a manual skyline in a specific model, you'll find that some of the R34 range only came out in a auto only. If you only have a slush-box licence, then your laughing.

I/We all realise your new but when other SAu members say to 'search' it's not to be mean or blunt. It's because the same question has come up many times over the years and the answers haven't changed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4681626
Share on other sites

Quick Q' What about a GT-T and remove the turbo, or would that violate the NO TURBO Rule, I don't know?

yes. the car is registered as a turbo so they aren't going to car if the turbo is removed.

also, as i said in my post, and others have said, the turbo motor has lower compression, so that means that it will be slower with the turbo removed than a NA. in fact it would probably be about as fast as a hyundai excel..... if the hyundai is being driven by a 90 year old lady

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4681929
Share on other sites

I've read a thread or two where people have converted the engine to non-turbo with the DE manifold n all, though A/F's needed bit of cleaning up. Apparently runs quite well considering compression and all, but I wouldn't be holding my breath.

After all that you'd have to get engineer certs etc.. to be able to register the car as a non-turbo. Main reason some end up going down that path is because they've found turbo skylines more affordable to purchase than N/A Skylines.

Anyways your options really are the following:

a) Buy an N/A Skyline now, sell it and buy a turbo Skyline when you're on your open licence.

b) Buy an N/A Skyline now, modify suspension, brakes, handling, Wheels n Tyres, then when you're open licence do a bolt-on turbo conversion

c) Buy an N/A Skyline now, modify suspension, brakes, handling, Wheels n Tyres, then when you're open licence do a RB25DET NEO Swap

d) Buy another N/A Car that has more power than a Skyline (at 2.5litres there's not a huge amount of power on offer with a Skyline in comparison to a lot of other N/A cars out there that would prove cheaper to keep on the road) and when on your open licence, use that saved money to buy a GTT, or maybe even a GTR by then depending on how much you can save and how affordable they are in a few years time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4681969
Share on other sites

I've read a thread or two where people have converted the engine to non-turbo with the DE manifold n all, though A/F's needed bit of cleaning up. Apparently runs quite well considering compression and all, but I wouldn't be holding my breath.

After all that you'd have to get engineer certs etc.. to be able to register the car as a non-turbo. Main reason some end up going down that path is because they've found turbo skylines more affordable to purchase than N/A Skylines.

Anyways your options really are the following:

a) Buy an N/A Skyline now, sell it and buy a turbo Skyline when you're on your open licence.

b) Buy an N/A Skyline now, modify suspension, brakes, handling, Wheels n Tyres, then when you're open licence do a bolt-on turbo conversion

c) Buy an N/A Skyline now, modify suspension, brakes, handling, Wheels n Tyres, then when you're open licence do a RB25DET NEO Swap

d) Buy another N/A Car that has more power than a Skyline (at 2.5litres there's not a huge amount of power on offer with a Skyline in comparison to a lot of other N/A cars out there that would prove cheaper to keep on the road) and when on your open licence, use that saved money to buy a GTT, or maybe even a GTR by then depending on how much you can save and how affordable they are in a few years time.

yeah, that would be the best and cheapest way. get something like a manual 3.5L v6 magna. quicker than a NA skyline. only downside is fwd, but if you can't handle it, you sure as hell won't be able to handle a turbo skyline. they don't really torque steer at all compared to some other FWD cars.

or a n15 SSS pulsar. probably as quick as a NA skyline once a set of extractors are put on. i have owned both a v6 magna (2 actually, and 1 ran a 14.8 at willowbank with just a cat back exhaust) and a n15 SSS and i loved both of them. still have the pulsar (it's the missus now) and they are a great little car. could just do with a bit more torque (like from putting a turbo on, but the missus won't let me). and being fwd will mean that there is less chance of you being stupid and trying to drift and either getting booked or crashing.... or both.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276510-na-vs-turbo/#findComment-4682054
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...