Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, just wondering, for those who are running non-AFM tuned R34 GTR's, what are most of you running in terms of pod filter setup and intake design? I know that R32 and R33 are different so this is really a thread for R34 GTR only.

There's the APEXi twin power intake kit, then there's the HKS and Trust versions. BUT what options are there available if I wanted to run twin K&N pods? Must the intake pipes be custom fabricated or is there a kit available?

Interested to hear what people have done as I have a D-Jetro and want to upgrade my standard air box.

Cheers,

Ed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277070-pod-filter-intake-setup/
Share on other sites

Any reason why u wanna run the knn filters? seems apexi got the best rating for airflow/filtration so a simple kit from them would be the best bet.

knn i recall uses a hoseclamp so you could use the standard rubber intake hoses and a piece of alluminuim/stainless to adapt the filter onto; woud be very simple and cheap as knn filters are washable....but then again, so are apexi and you can buy new ones every 2 years or so for 150bsu so they always look new.

as you have a vs2, id say money aint too big an issue, possibly an arc airbox to keep the cops from asking too many questions.

There is not much difference between the R32/R33/R34 GTR intake systems.

As Johnny said APexi are decent pod filters and the kit should come with 2 metal intake pipes to you can bolt on the air pods then bolt on to the AFM's.

One of the reasons I think to run an APexi D-Jetro, is for the GTR's which run massive single turbo conversions and there is no AFM, but I too have seen it on twin turbo setups.

I am not too clear why or what the difference is... Instead of having the 2 AFM's, they are replaced by 2 Map Sensors... Probably so the APexi Power FC can monitor it... Control it too... Maybe.

APexi pods - http://www.nengun.com/apexi/power-intake-gtr

Looks like they do come with pieces of aluminium/stainless to adapt the pods on.

Any reason for modifying to twin air pods?

The standard R34 GTR air box and filter is good for over 300 kW's.

Hey thanks for your replies guys, appreciate your thoughts.

Johnny:

My tuner is getting better results from K&N's over the APEXi's. I've seen results from comparisons on an R32 GTR and Mazda 6 MPS. The ARC airbox is close to double the price, and is it really worth it for the extra 10hp or so gain vs twin pods? It's not really that stock either, it's big and silver with orange filters haha. But I do appreciate it is a good piece of gear though.

(OO)SKYLINE(OO):

I went wth D-Jetro as the AFM's max out. Yes they run off MAP sensors and yes you can use oiled filters now that the AFM's are bypassed/removed. Also, this means the intake pipe can also be increased in diameter to a custom or off the shelf kit . The APEXi Power intake kit retains the AFM piping so I'm really looking to get rid of them all together as I don't need them there. As for reason in modifying, I'm convinced that twin pods will flow better than the stock air box.

I kept the AFM's installed for that "stock" appearance when I ran a map based ecu in my R33. They arent a performance restriction unless your chasing over 600hp. That opens up the world of other options for AFM based air filters. I was using an aluminium ARC air box. They have nice trumpets inside the box where the MAF sensors bolt onto it.

Hey thanks for your replies guys, appreciate your thoughts.

Johnny:

My tuner is getting better results from K&N's over the APEXi's. I've seen results from comparisons on an R32 GTR and Mazda 6 MPS. The ARC airbox is close to double the price, and is it really worth it for the extra 10hp or so gain vs twin pods? It's not really that stock either, it's big and silver with orange filters haha. But I do appreciate it is a good piece of gear though.

(OO)SKYLINE(OO):

I went wth D-Jetro as the AFM's max out. Yes they run off MAP sensors and yes you can use oiled filters now that the AFM's are bypassed/removed. Also, this means the intake pipe can also be increased in diameter to a custom or off the shelf kit . The APEXi Power intake kit retains the AFM piping so I'm really looking to get rid of them all together as I don't need them there. As for reason in modifying, I'm convinced that twin pods will flow better than the stock air box.

Right I see.

That explains the point of D-Jetro. Maxing out the AFM's and want even more air = Have a bigger air pod... LOL!

So how big of a pod do you want?

You could take off the AFM piping and just have the pod itself... :P

Yeah, you will get a lot of air in with twin pods... Since you have a Nur, which runs 1.2 Bar = 17.4 Psi, pods will free up the air flow with your test proven.

I guess you can shield off the pods on the side and retain the standard air feed to feed air to the pods.

I want to run standard size'd K&N pod's with the AFM's removed so I have a slightly larger diameter intake but don't know what pipes I need. At this stage I think they'd have to be custom made as I see no kits available from K&N or even a generic type to suit 34GTR. I know APEXi and HKS do the full 'hard piping' kits but they're stupidly overpriced in my opinion (in excess of $750+) - may as well go a full ARC intake box.

Anyway thanks guys, appreciate all your comments. I just wanted to know if anyone else was running K&N pod's and what piping kits were/are available to suit them non-AFM style.

Cheers,

Ed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...