Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDY68029.txt

IDY68029

Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology

MEDIA:

NO USE OF STANDARD EMERGENCY WARNING SIGNAL [sEWS]

TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE AND FREQUENT BROADCAST

********************************************************************************

TSUNAMI WARNING NUMBER 1 FOR PARTS OF VICTORIA

Issued by the Joint Australian Tsunami Warning Centre [JATWC] at

8.28pm 15 June 2009

********************************************************************************

TSUNAMI THREAT TO THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT

********************************************************************************

SUMMARY:

Tsunami warning for the marine environment for parts of VICTORIA.

Threatened areas extend from Lakes Entrance to Gabo Island including Gabo

Island, Lakes Entrance, Mallacoota and Point Hicks.

Possibility of DANGEROUS WAVES, STRONG OCEAN CURRENTS AND SOME LOCALISED

OVERFLOW ONTO THE IMMEDIATE FORESHORE for several hours from 10:15 pm [EST]

Wednesday.

Although major evacuations are not required, people are advised to get out of

the water and move away from the immediate water's edge.

Next update will be issued by #next_issue_state#.

For latest and further information call 1300 TSUNAMI [1300 878 6264] or visit

www.bom.gov.au

********************************************************************************

DETAILS:

A threat of DANGEROUS WAVES, STRONG OCEAN CURRENTS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF SOME

LOCALISED OVERFLOW ONTO THE IMMEDIATE FORESHORE exists for parts of

VICTORIA from Lakes Entrance to Gabo Island including Gabo Island, Lakes

Entrance, Mallacoota and Point Hicks.

Tsunami effects are expected at the following locations from these times:

Lakes Entrance after 10:15 pm [EST] Wednesday

COMMUNITY RESPONSE ADVICE FROM THE VICTORIAN STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE

- While major evacuations in these areas are not required, people are advised

to get out of the water and move away from the immediate water's edge of

harbours, coastal estuaries, rock platforms and beaches.

- Boats in harbours, estuaries or shallow coastal water should return to

shore. Secure your boat and move away from the waterfront.

- Vessels already at sea should stay offshore in deep water until further

advised.

- Do not go to the coast to watch the tsunami, as there is the possibility of

dangerous, localised flooding of the immediate foreshore.

- Check that your neighbours have received this advice.

CAUTION:

Tsunami waves are more powerful than the same size beach waves, with the first

wave not necessarily being the largest.

Low-level effects may be observed in neighbouring coastal areas. People are

advised to take care.

TSUNAMI SOURCE:

An undersea earthquake of magnitude 7.9 [Latitude 45.960S Longitude 166.470E ]

occurred at 07:22 PM EST on Wednesday 15 July 2009 near OFF W. COAST OF S.

ISLAND, N.Z..

Sea level observations have confirmed a tsunami.

********************************************************************************

The earthquake of magnitude 7.9 [Latitude 45.960S Longitude 166.470E ]

occurred at 07:22 PM EST on Wednesday 15 July 2009.

********************************************************************************

The NEXT UPDATE will be issued by #next_issue_state# local time.

FOR LATEST AND FURTHER INFORMATION:

Call 1300 TSUNAMI [1300 878 6264] or visit www.bom.gov.au

FOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE:

Call the VICTORIAN STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE on 132 500

********************************************************************************

EST = Eastern Standard Time

CST = Central Standard Time = EST - 30 minutes

WST = Western Standard Time = EST - 2 hours

The JATWC is operated by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology and Geoscience

Australia

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279280-tsunami-warning/
Share on other sites

It was over 2 hours after it happend.

Even if it did happen they were only estimating it to be like a 20cm wave.... OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO lol

shame i was quite hoping for some excitement... but also living in the hills it wouldnt have made much of a diff

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279280-tsunami-warning/#findComment-4717108
Share on other sites

*waits for some asehole to make a boat joke about 33s*...

Quick, everyone get in my R33.

After the floods die down we can go for a cruise...to the Caribbean...

:mellow:

For the record, I do take warnings very seriously...at first. But not unnecessarily-updated-every-ad-break-minor-shift-in-some-subcontinent's-plate crap. After reading this full warning issue I'm surprised it got as much attention as it did. Fair enough to warn the mariners and islanders. But the word tsunami is now synonymous with thousands of people dying (despite the fact these small ones are quite common), so the newsmedia tend to jump on that one.

Edited by Birds
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279280-tsunami-warning/#findComment-4717679
Share on other sites

For the record, I do take warnings very seriously...at first. But not unnecessarily-updated-every-ad-break-minor-shift-in-some-subcontinent's-plate crap. After reading this full warning issue I'm surprised it got as much attention as it did. Fair enough to warn the mariners and islanders. But the word tsunami is now synonymous with thousands of people dying (despite the fact these small ones are quite common), so the newsmedia tend to jump on that one.

remember not so long ago the bush fire's ? everyone cracked it cause there was enough warning.

now there is warning, may be over the top, but people were alerted, saves there own arse's and gives residents a bit of heads up, they cant get the weather right nor can they tell the size of a wave coming from 2hours away.

there will always be someone out there who will jump up and go ' there was no warning, we could of been killed, whats the government doing about it?'

even if there was no threat, then sure enough everyone jumps on the band wagon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279280-tsunami-warning/#findComment-4718459
Share on other sites

Yer I agree warnings are a good idea, it's just that in this case the severity was a bit on the low and I feel the media/BOM were jumping the guns on a slow day.

On the side, does anyone know if this tsunami had much of an impact on anything? Docks, ships etc?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/279280-tsunami-warning/#findComment-4719894
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...