Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

will probably still fail with a 15year old cat anyway

so it makes no difference whether you have an aftermarket exhaust system or not: without the 'special' cat it wont pass pretty much. tho if you send your car to Kostecki's for tuning, cant they tune it to meet your car's emmisions of its day even with an aftermarket cat fitted?

and btw, has anyone here actually had this test done on their cars??

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Has anyone reported this scam to the ACCC and if so what has been the response.

@ Turbo x-trail...you mentioned they charge $450 for the test and $135/hr x 3 hours for a total of $855. What's the $135/hr for and why 3 hours for a 4 minute test?

Tests are done in 240 second runs, they have to adjust a lot of paramters in between tests and run a new test each time, until they nail it. Its a matter of how many retunes they need to do to get satisfactory results, sometimes its not many, sometimes its alot.

Tests are done in 240 second runs, they have to adjust a lot of paramters in between tests and run a new test each time, until they nail it. Its a matter of how many retunes they need to do to get satisfactory results, sometimes its not many, sometimes its alot.

Eye C....so assuming the benchmark time for these tests is around 3 hours, they really aren't going to be getting too many done in a day and if all of a sudden the cops and the pits start cranking up the amount of emmision test requests on car enthusists vehicles, there could be a very long wait and inconvenience to people, which makes this one testing facility appear even more of a scam. ...and where do the carbon spewing desiel 4x4's fit into the equation along with the old poluting HQ's and XA's?

Would be nice to be able to monitor which type of cars are being tested to determine who is being targeted. If it appears that it is only car enthusists, then a descrimination case could be levelled at the Minister, after all carbon spewing desiel's and old bunkies must surely be of concern to the environment.

@ Turbo x-trail...you mentioned they charge $450 for the test and $135/hr x 3 hours for a total of $855. What's the $135/hr for and why 3 hours for a 4 minute test?

this was for set-up too. could take a fair while for car to go from the garage onto the dyno and set all the equipment going.

and Nic_A31 is right, theyll keep doing the test, re-tuning every time until it passes.

and where do the carbon spewing desiel 4x4's fit into the equation along with the old poluting HQ's and XA's?

there's a similar test that was implemented at the same time as the IM240, for diesels.

similar sort of deal, but there's bin alot less noise about it cos (erroneously) big carbon dumping 4WDs dont attract as much attention as well kept, performance cars. if the men in blue/government authorities were really worried about emissions, they would at least target said 4x4s, and the old carbon fiends like the XE/XF HQ (etc) early model cars, not well tuned good condition performance vehicles with modern technology...

extracts from my e-mail to Minister O'Brien:

The part that angers most people, is the fact that the testing requires the car's engine meets standards of their respective year. This means that an early model falcons/commodores/kingswoods, most of which my now would be in far less than factory condition, are being passed, while they still blow soot, carbon and unburnt fuel into the atmosphere (due to less strict - read non-existent - emissions laws of that period), while cars of less than 10 years old, prime examples are Falcons, Commodores, Nissan Skylines, Nissan Silvias, Subaru WRXs with new technology and in great condition, are being failed. It is common knowledge that the latter mentioned cars are 'targets' for police inspections, especially with younger drivers behind the wheel. So effectively, old, dirty carbon spewing cars can be still considered legal, while newer cars, with substantially less pollutants, are being defected. How can we (the general public) be assured that the government is doing the best to help out environment, when this blatant contradiction is in existence?
I know I speak for not only myself, but for thousands of car enthusiasts, and everyday drivers who on their next drive, could well receive a bill for upwards of $900 dollars plus.
Although KEC have the appropriate testing facility, they have nowhere near enough resources to be able to test the volume of cars this new regulation now deams "illegal". The testing implies that (with no exaggeration) roughly 70% of the cars on the road would not be legal. Cars that are old or in small disrepair or with ANY exhaust modification, even if it is of manufacturer standards or above, aftermarket performance parts (turbo/superchargers, high spec camshafts, engine management systems etc.) meet this criteria along with a few brand new cars that have been proven to not meet ADR standards. The latter of which was undertaken by an indepentant car dealership in Sydney, with a VE SS commodore ute (equiped - from factory - with a 6.0L GM sourced V8 engine), a Subaru Impreza WRX STi, and a VE Commodore with the 3.6l V6 powerplant installed. Only the V6 commodore passed the testing. These cars, are fresh from the factory, are ready to be sold to average Joe and average Jane citizen, but little do they know that they could well be up for almost $3000 dollars to make their stock car, legal.
Noteworthy at this time, the test itself (which is undertaken on a chassis 'dyno') may not be suitable for some AWD or 4WD cars. Some cars with aforementioned drivetrains, cannot safely be put on a dyno to perform this test without severe, expensive damage to (and not limited to) gearbox, transfer case, differetial, drive shafts and wheel hub and bearings. Who would then pay for this repair?

The last statement is incorrect. You say that most AWD/4WD cars "cannot safely be put on a dyno", that isn't the case. I believe KEC only have a RWD chassis dyno, that is the problem. If they had a 4WD dyno then it wouldn't be an issue.

I'd just be very careful about what you say in your letters guys, any fallacies or inconsistencies will only serve to undermine our efforts. Make sure you know the facts.

You say that most AWD/4WD cars "cannot safely be put on a dyno", that isn't the case.

this is the case for my car (x-trail) i know for sure.

due to the electronic nature of the 4WD system it cant be run on a dyno without removing the rear prop shaft - but not many x-trail owners know that.

its not possible to (even in 2WD mode) to just run two wheels independently, several of the safety features of my x-trail kick in, cos it senses that the front wheels are spinning and tries to engage the rears. goodbye rear diff.

i think 100series landcruisers have a problem with dynos too.

so yeh, we now have two problems if thats the case with their dyno.

im sure i read somewhere that they do have a 4WD dyno, but i cant find it, so i think your right.

more ammunition...

this is the case for my car (x-trail) i know for sure.

due to the electronic nature of the 4WD system it cant be run on a dyno without removing the rear prop shaft - but not many x-trail owners know that.

its not possible to (even in 2WD mode) to just run two wheels independently, several of the safety features of my x-trail kick in, cos it senses that the front wheels are spinning and tries to engage the rears. goodbye rear diff.

i think 100series landcruisers have a problem with dynos too.

so yeh, we now have two problems if thats the case with their dyno.

im sure i read somewhere that they do have a 4WD dyno, but i cant find it, so i think your right.

more ammunition...

I think what Bubba was saying is that in your statement, you said AWD/4WD cars can not be safely put on a dyno, not that they cant safely be put on Kostecki's single drive dyno. It makes it sound like you are not aware there are AWD/4WD dyno's out there, which undermines your whole letter.

Load of rubbish, but i see where the government would get their claim from.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well some news that one of the members on Antilag posted up this evening.

Good news..

- MEMBER ALERT -

ARD, AADA, IVD, AAR, ATD, FID, ERD MEMBERS

20 August 2009

CHANGES TO EMISSION TESTING TO LIGHT VEHICLES IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA

As a result of considerable concern within the automotive industry about a complete change to emission testing arrangements for light vehicles in Western Australia a meeting was held at the MTA last week involving automotive repairers and representatives from the Department of Transport involved in the emissions testing arena. At that meeting a number of issues were discussed that have arisen as a result of the release of Vehicle Safety Standards Information Bulletin in March 2009 which took effect in April 2009.

The issues included;

· The lack of consultation with industry ;

· The inadequacy of the number of testing facilities;

· Problems with the replacement of catalytic converters;

· A series of issues relating to LPG installations;

· The lack of education campaign for members of the public; and

· No procedures in place for present for 4WD emission testing.

As a result of the discussions at the meeting, the following actions have been proposed to the Minister for Transport and his Department:

· The Information Bulletin on IM240 testing needs to be immediately withdrawn to allow consultation with industry and only reinstated when there is appropriate infrastructure in place to support the policy.

· That consideration is given to setting up a government testing facility along similar lines to that available in NSW.

· Testing facilities need to be made available to regional Western Australia.

· There needs to be a public education program to inform the community about the changes.

· There is a need to consult with the Police about the changes and future enforcement measures.

· There needs to be further consultation with industry over a 4WD testing regime.

· There needs to be much greater consultation with industry over the testing of LPG fitted vehicles particularly those that would fail an emission test prior to the installation of a gas system.

· There needs to be a system of accreditation of component parts that are deemed to be compliant particularly with catalytic converters and exhaust systems.

I have urged the Minister to take immediate steps to suspend the Information Bulletin to avoid any further outcry from industry and the risk of embarrassment to the Department. I will be meeting with the Minister tomorrow, Friday 21st August and emissions testing will be high on the agenda for that meeting.

I will keep you informed of all further developments.

Yours sincerely

PETER FITZPATRICK AM, JP, FSAE, GAICD

Chief Executive

So who is going to be pro active by replacing that De Cat pipe just not with a "race use only" cheap arse Chinese cat but a descent OBD II/Euro compliant one.

The more people who get pinged for De Cat pipes and $15 US Cats the more strength policy's like these have............ What do think rushed this one through.

Nothing has been won yet guys, all that release states is that the MTA is pissed off and on the case. Fortunately, they (as a body) are in a much better position to fight this than your average Joe.

DRIFTT, I don't think anybody should be proactively doing anything in regards to purchasing new cats until there is an accreditation system as mentioned by the MTA.. wouldn't want to go spend $_$ on a supposedly compliant cat to then have it fail the test or not be on the list.

Edited by bubba

one of my mates who just finished doing an evo 5 transplant into a ce mirage had these hoops to jump through too, the lucky thing for him was, in his state its funded by the government or sumthin, and he only had to pay a couple of hundred dollars, if you ship your car to the eastern states to get the emissions test done im sure that would work out cheaper?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, I started this repair and got as far as "fixing" the holes with some fibreglass. God all those years working on boats came back quickly. I decided I'd reach out to some rust guys just to see what they would say about it. I came across a guy about 40 mins away and went to see him. He said the windscreen needs to come out, that there might be some more bits around the windscreen and he'd quote them at the time. But his quote was $300 to remove and replace windscreen and $3k for the damage he can see. He said he could respray the roof for $1200 and the bonnet for another $800 (somebody has previously rattle canned it, its horrendous). This is $5300 + any small additional bits. It's a lot, I get that and the name of one of my fave youtube channels 'Not Economically Viable' comes to mind.  I'm not being financially rational, but I've taken him up on the quote. He's opening a new shop in November with more room, so we're waiting for that. I'll leave the currently missing headliner out until then. I'm looking forward to it being fixed and having the paint looking nice again (lots of clear coat issues on the roof too). / flame suit on.
    • Oh and some up-and-comings; New rear drivers wheel bearing. I'll do that this weekend while the diff is out. The car is already up and the d/c axles and missing exhaust will help with space. This is the last bearing for me to do and I've been dragging my feet on it. I also have some new EBC blue stuff pads for the car and some new brake fluid. I haven't ever flushed the fluid in this car and looking forward to it. I have 600 degree fluid to put in. Not exactly "race fluid" but better than the typical stuff I have been using.
    • A proper clutch/plate type mechanical diff with quite a lot of pre-load and high locking % is better for drifting. Much more consistent in its behaviour. A helical can be annoyingly vague and inconsistent in how it responds under the sorts of abuse found in drifting.
    • Some updates here. I pulled the entire interior out, minus some trim to respray the seats with Colourlock dye. It turned out really nice though I accidentally let the dog in the car after and she scratched up the front seat.  This is what it looked like before, the colour was just washing out everywhere but thankfully the leather was in good nic. Then after the respray   And after the bloody dog jumped in The headliner is out waiting to be retrimmed, but it will stay out now until Nov - see why below. I replaced the stereo/headunit with a period-styled Android headunit. I have no after pics, but I'll get some. This is because of the missing pixels. I tried to fix this twice with replacement ribbon cables but couldn't. Also the bluetooth interface I'd bought for this was crap. Then there's the rusty roof. Pics and info in this other thread. I have decided to get this repaired professionally, but I'll update that thread. This is why the headliner will stay out for now. I'll be getting the roof and bonnet resprayed at the same time the rust is fixed. I also had an interesting issue with my drivers door lock.  For a small period I was having issues getting any 12v power to the car - I mean *any*. It would have no dash lights, nothing. It happened while I was at the shops and I couldn't get in the car. So, we had 2 problems. The most pressing here is that I was locked out. I have only a single physical key hole on the car, the drivers door and no amount of turning would unlock the car. Surely it doesn't need power for this? The second issue is why am I losing all power periodically, The battery isn't dead, its almost like the battery isn't even there. Two issues that were surprisingly easy to fix. You fellow BMW over-engineering lovers will appreciate this. The lock in the door has 5 states; mechanical lock, electric lock, neutral, electric unlock, mechanical unlock achieved at -90 degrees, -45 degrees, 0 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees. Although, the unlock is towards the front of the car, so opposite for LHD countries. Sticking the key in and turning 45 left or right is what is used 99% of the time. It activates the central locking etc. 90 degrees is for dead battery access and, obvs, only un/locks the one door. But because the mechanical lock is never used and is 27 years old, it seizes up. I was totally unable to turn the key far enough to get to the mechanical unlock (At the time of locking myself out, I didn't even know this was a thing). I eventually did it with some vicegrips and teflon spray.  I made a quick vid for other E39 peeps.   The battery issue is totally new to me also - It wasn't making sufficient contact between the post and the terminal. The terminal was bolted on tight, but the car wouldn't have power. After checking the battery with my multimeter I accidentally contacted the terminal and the battery post and the car got power. The battery was only a few years old and in good condition. I cleaned the post and the terminal with a wire brush, bolted it back on tight and never had the issue again. I'm still surprised that despite having solid contact it didn't work. Also, the car was getting Warragamba sized pools of water in the back when it rained. My initial concern was another rust problem. But when I went out on Weds while it was raining and while I had no headliner in I could see a steady stream of water coming through the roof mounted aerial. As this aerial is for the (now removed) car phone I pulled it out and whacked a blanking grommet in the hole. It seems fine now. I'm thinking I might get the hole permanently filled when the rust is fixed. Moving forward and things in progress; The tailgate needs some attention. I have taken all the trim off to clean it all and address some small rust spots. I have partially done all of this but I'll finish it up hopefully this weekend. As all the trim are now entirely devoid of trim clips I have bought a heap of strong velcro and I'm hoping it does a good enough job as any of this trim in good condition is super expensive and usually in Europe as we dont have many of the wagons here. Suspension and brakes!!! This is exciting. In the front; New control arms New sway bar links New lower Eibach springs (the only modification I'm planning on this car) M Sport shocks (these came with the car and will replace the longer shocks in the car) New top mounts Used 540i calipers (stock brakes suck!) New 540i disks and pads (22x296 mm for 528 and 30x334 mm for 540i) New front wheel bearings (thank all that is holy for bolt on bearings!) Annnnd in the back; New control arms New sway bar links Adjustable air suspension arms (fool the car into what the current height is so the self levelling suspension can match the new front ride height) New ball joints I'll also be doing a brake fluid flush while I'm in there. I'm planning on switching the car over to the 16's that came with it so I can clean up and respray the M Sport 17's. They've lost a lot of colour over the years and have some gutter rash. None of this will start until the E90 is back.
    • You mean you will regret it for drifting duties? I don't quite follow.
×
×
  • Create New...