Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gcg sell something like your suggesting, can be seen on the uas website in the turbo section!!! that would give you an idea then get someone to build it or maybe gcg will exchange yours for one etc...

link to page

http://www.uniqueautosports.com/pricelists...list_turbos.htm

I actually had the turbosmart ultra gate welded onto my exhaust housing. do a search in this thread for "trust td06 stage 1" and that should bring up a link with some photo's of how it was done, if you cant find them PM me and I will email them to you. This way it can be bolted onto the stock manifold without too much modification, from a flow point of view though you want to get rid of the stock exhaust manifold as its flow is shite.

ive seen that, where an external gate is welded onto the exaust housing.

my only question would be - does it seriously effect the exaust flow?

it makes alot of sense for the flow to follow that snail shape and push the turbine around, but would changing the direction anywhere in that housing reduce flow properties?

just a question out of curiosity

paul is it easy to weld?

a bloke i know told me it couldnt be welded to the manifold cos its cast.... but a turbo yeah?

also who could do it? any good turbo place like AVO or somethin over here in the eastern states? also how much has the guy over there charged to do this (i forget his name now but i read it in ur post from a while ago)

Here is a pic of what i did to mine. I did all the machining work myself then had the block welded to the stcok manifold, this cost over $200 to be done as it needs to be heated then welded then cooled slowly, then it needs to be faces as the manifold distorts because of the heat. If you got someone to do the job for you it would be over 400.

Welding the gate to the housing is ok, but does not work as well, either does modding the stock manifold, i would just get it done propely with a new manifold or buy a diff turbo.

Sorry Clint32, but a wastegate can be too big, they bypass too much exhaust gas, tubine slows and the boost drops so the wastegate closes. Then the boost climbs and they open again. Then they bypass too much exhaust gas, tubine slows and the boost drops so the wastegate closes again. This cycling causes surging as the boost moves around and also wears out the wastegate.

Get the right size is my recommendation.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Sorry Clint32, but a wastegate can be too big, they bypass too much exhaust gas, tubine slows and the boost drops so the wastegate closes.  Then the boost climbs and they open again.  Then they bypass too much exhaust gas, tubine slows and the boost drops so the wastegate closes again.  This cycling causes surging as the boost moves around and also wears out the wastegate.

Get the right size is my recommendation.

Cool thought something like that would be the case..

What size for a T04E as Kamikaze said? ;)

Originally posted by Clint32

Here is a pic of what i did to mine.  I did all the machining work myself then had the block welded to the stcok manifold, this cost over $200 to be done as it needs to be heated then welded then cooled slowly, then it needs to be faces as the manifold distorts because of the heat.  If you got someone to do the job for you it would be over 400.  

Welding the gate to the housing is ok, but does not work as well, either does modding the stock manifold, i would just get it done propely with a new manifold or buy a diff turbo.

dude that manifold must flow shit coz each runner is a different size?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...