Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh depends what size tyre u use, if u used the same size tyre on the 8" as u did on the 7", bit of strectch but ull gain a tiny bit more clearance from the chassis rail at full lock (due to the lower offset). u go a lower profile and ull gain quite a bit more clearance once again. i know it may not make sense, but uve gotta remember on the inside, the different components that u can foul on, foul in different ways.

but yeh ideally for a 8" u want at least a +25 or so offset to get some inner clearance.

My semi's arrive tomorrow so for DECA it'll be 235/45's on 7" wide rim and then towards the end of the month when the dude sells me those rims it'll be those tyres on an 8" rim.

Edited by ActionDan

yeh doesnt surprise me that's fouling quite hard on full lock. if ur planning on doing drift, ull need to go something like a +25 offset to get that away from the rails on full lock, the problem only gets worse if u put lock spacers in to give you more lock. id say at that point ur probably looking at needing a +20 or so offset. that will be pretty snug up against the guard, but you should be fine with -4 camber as that will tuck it in a lot.

it's not about choosing to go skinnier, it's about having two sets of rims, one set is 8" so they will be my circuit rims as they are more suited to the 235 rubber and another set are 7" so they will be my skid rims because I don't take drift seriously and don't mind if I bang them up plus they will suit the thinner cheapr rubber I have on hand that I don't mind burning up.

  • 3 weeks later...

Niss: As per my PM on NS

"I've been reading a few offset/clearance threads and you and I seem to be on the same page, that is tyres that fit the rim PROPERLY.

I've got some 235/45/R17 semi's and I'm looking for suitable rims to go with them. At the moment they are ballooned onto my 17x7 ET40 rims and they look bad and don't handle well. also, they JUST clear the springs up front . (-2.5 camber)

I'm thinking 17x8 rims all round (is this wide enough) or if I go 9's all round will I have clearance issues? I'm not sure what offset to get either.

To throw another spanner in it, I've got S15 calipers up front and I'm still running 4 stud.

Thoughts? "

Those enkies I went to get in melb turned out to be 7J up front so I drove home (3hrs) empty handed.

Is an 8 or 9J going to be better and what sort of offset should I be looking for to ensure the inner clearances are OK.

Finding wheels has been an nightmare...

Edited by ActionDan

hey mate, 8" will be wide enough, but u can go up to 9" if you think you might want to go wider in the future, 9" will hold a 255 easily, or u simply prefer a more direct feel (not such an issue with semi slicks due to their stiff sidewalls anyway).

as far as clearance issues, the mac strut on the S13's is known for shitty inner clearance when you go aftermarket coilovers, how much depends on each coilover, but generally the safe point seems to be around 9" +20 where it should clear most coilovers. unfortunately this will push out pretty far in ur guards, especially if u run a 255 down the track. if you want more carefree fitment, u could get away with something like a 8" +30.

u can then go a 9" +30 on the rear and run a 235 there as well if u want, generally when the car is running close to stock power, i find a neutral tyre setup works well on these cars as they do have a bit of understeer from factory, and not heaps of power to put down. but depends on the suspension setup etc, and how much power it's letting u put down.

hey mate, 8" will be wide enough, but u can go up to 9" if you think you might want to go wider in the future, 9" will hold a 255 easily, or u simply prefer a more direct feel (not such an issue with semi slicks due to their stiff sidewalls anyway).

as far as clearance issues, the mac strut on the S13's is known for shitty inner clearance when you go aftermarket coilovers, how much depends on each coilover, but generally the safe point seems to be around 9" +20 where it should clear most coilovers. unfortunately this will push out pretty far in ur guards, especially if u run a 255 down the track. if you want more carefree fitment, u could get away with something like a 8" +30.

u can then go a 9" +30 on the rear and run a 235 there as well if u want, generally when the car is running close to stock power, i find a neutral tyre setup works well on these cars as they do have a bit of understeer from factory, and not heaps of power to put down. but depends on the suspension setup etc, and how much power it's letting u put down.

Ahh OK, Cheers for that.

So if i can find a set of rims 8" all round and +30 at the highest i should be right, or I could also go 9" and +30 on the back if I find a set that has staggered rim widths.

The car maks SFA power, wouldn't be more than 130rwkw's at the most at present. Will get more down the track.

Thos Drift Teks seem popular but come in either 8" +34 or 9" + 35 which will give me less clearance than I have now. I'll have to check ow far out the rim is as the tyre is just clearing at my camber settings but I'm not sure where the rim is sitting right now.

Thos Drift Teks seem popular but come in either 8" +34 or 9" + 35 which will give me less clearance than I have now. I'll have to check ow far out the rim is as the tyre is just clearing at my camber settings but I'm not sure where the rim is sitting right now.

yeh i cant remember if u mentioned what suss u were running, but check the clearance u have now, u might be able to get away with more.

and try to stay away from driftteks, they are expensive cheap junk lol when u look at what u can get 2nd hand, and even new for around the same $$ it seems crazy to buy them.

I've got BC brand BR coilovers, cheap shit ones but they do the job OK.

I'm having trouble finding almost anything suitablle. I'll get under the car and check out some clearances tonight. Even an 8" wide rim with +30 is going to eat up another 3mm inner clearance..

yeh 3mm isnt heaps though, and the main thing when it comes to scrubbing on lock is the offset is down. as mentioned chassis scrubbing on lock is to do with tyre size and wheel offset, wheel width plays a insignificant role, as hard as it is to understand.

what about something like this?

http://www.justjap.com/store/product.php?p...at=0&page=1

wonder if they come in 4 stud?

There's a set of drift teks going right now, tempting, surely they can't be that weak if every has'em on drift cars?

What else could i get in that price range quickly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...