Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/St...ds-t280020.html

Which product to buy, and where from?

APEXI AVC-R

Turbosmart E-Boost

Both need rpm inputs, and I've been advised that both of these do.

Cheers.

Id use the E-boost if i had to choose between those two...if i had any choice id use a Blitz ID-III...the best on the market.

While I'm at it. How do these puppies work? They must measure and control boost. How does it measure the boost? How does it control the boost? I think the later is via solenoid? If I have a twin turb set up I assume I'll need 2 solenoids.

Someone care to explain in relatively simple terms how these jiggers work and how it all hangs together and where the electrical and mechanical interfaces are.

Thanks.

I use a profec B Spec II and never had a problem with it and have known a lot of people to use it as well.....ummm not sure about getting 2 solenoids etc for a twin turbo setup....that question might be answered by your tuner

you don't need 2 solenoids. and you don't need RPM based mapping either. and not having RPM mapping DOES NOT make it the same as the crap bleed valve currently in use.

they measure boost using a MAP sensor. all the kits will come with their own sensor. a good place to get the signal for it is T into the line going to the factory map sensor (small black box mounted on firewall).

the control boost using a solenoid and a computer. the computer gets input from the map sensor and gives it's output to the solenoid. they are better than a bleed valve as being "smart" you can program it to stay completely shut (thus allowing fast spool up) until quite close to your target boost before it starts to allow the wastegate flaps to open, then once open it keeps checking the map sensor input to ensure it can hold the boost at the level you want. so you can tune out the taper off problem you have now.

and do not buy the power FC boost control kit. they are pretty crap.

you don't need 2 solenoids. and you don't need RPM based mapping either. and not having RPM mapping DOES NOT make it the same as the crap bleed valve currently in use.

they measure boost using a MAP sensor. all the kits will come with their own sensor. a good place to get the signal for it is T into the line going to the factory map sensor (small black box mounted on firewall).

the control boost using a solenoid and a computer. the computer gets input from the map sensor and gives it's output to the solenoid. they are better than a bleed valve as being "smart" you can program it to stay completely shut (thus allowing fast spool up) until quite close to your target boost before it starts to allow the wastegate flaps to open, then once open it keeps checking the map sensor input to ensure it can hold the boost at the level you want. so you can tune out the taper off problem you have now.

and do not buy the power FC boost control kit. they are pretty crap.

Richard, where would you place your money?

HKS EVC V or Blitz SBC ID spec R or Bliz SBC I colour Spec R are the two top range ones. (don't confuse the two blitz ones as they each have a spec S version too which has a lesser solenoid, get the Spec R). the blitz dual SBC is good too, but old now and looks very dated, and costs nearly as much as the two newer ones (ID and i colour). all 3 have the same solenoid as long as you go for the spec R.

for best bang for buck though I like trust profec B II. easy to set-up and when tuned properly will hold boost very nicely. it's also small, and it will briefly display peak boost after every acceleration run, it also has overboost warning, and boost limiter (ie if car starts to overboost it can drop boost down to a set amount, tbh though limiter is not that useful as if car is overboosting something is wrong with the boost control!).

you definitely don't need 2 solenoids, how it works on a GTR is you simply T together the two pressure signals going to the wastegate actuators. it;s the same way it's controlled in the factory set-up. :D a dual solenoid (1 solenoid unit but with 2 seperate circuits/valves) is a good thing though.

I have personally used all the ones mentioned above and they all do a good job. for mild to mid serious GTRs (ie around 350rwkw or less) I am very happy with the profec B II. for a full on serious car or if you just want the best then the HKS EVC V or the blitz SBC ID type R or i colour type R are the way to go.

getting one for rpm based mapping is really not necessary unless you actually wanted to DELAY boost spool up. and that's just silly! if you need less boost at any given moment, use less throttle. the Apexi AVC-R is over 10 years old now. the HKS and blitz ones I recommended are both only a few years old and have evolved from their older designs.

the bad news is, the SBC ID R is about $700 the (very) old school dual SBC is about $600, the i colour spec R is about $1000 (but I believe it does have boost/RPM mapping which would make the tuner happy, and it has LOTS of functions). The HKS EVC V has RPM map too if needed, it's about $800.

The trust profec B II is about $450, so it's a good $250 jump to the SBC ID, and about double to the rest. the old school SBC type R is guess is good value as it has dual solenoid and is only about $150 more than the profec B II, but I find the profec B II holds boost well enough, and looks quite nice, and once you get to $600 for the SBC R, you may as well spend the extra $100 for the SBC ID which is much newer, now you're at $700 abd you think, well the HKS is only another $100. now you're at $800 and you think, well the top of the line i colour is only another $200. all of a sudden you are double the price of the profec!

so where would I put my money? It would be between these 3:

profec B II

HKS EVC V (as it's new, just released less than 12 months ago)

Blitz I-colour type R (same as above).

HKS EVC V or Blitz SBC ID spec R or Bliz SBC I colour Spec R are the two top range ones. (don't confuse the two blitz ones as they each have a spec S version too which has a lesser solenoid, get the Spec R). the blitz dual SBC is good too, but old now and looks very dated, and costs nearly as much as the two newer ones (ID and i colour). all 3 have the same solenoid as long as you go for the spec R.

for best bang for buck though I like trust profec B II. easy to set-up and when tuned properly will hold boost very nicely. it's also small, and it will briefly display peak boost after every acceleration run, it also has overboost warning, and boost limiter (ie if car starts to overboost it can drop boost down to a set amount, tbh though limiter is not that useful as if car is overboosting something is wrong with the boost control!).

you definitely don't need 2 solenoids, how it works on a GTR is you simply T together the two pressure signals going to the wastegate actuators. it;s the same way it's controlled in the factory set-up. ;) a dual solenoid (1 solenoid unit but with 2 seperate circuits/valves) is a good thing though.

I have personally used all the ones mentioned above and they all do a good job. for mild to mid serious GTRs (ie around 350rwkw or less) I am very happy with the profec B II. for a full on serious car or if you just want the best then the HKS EVC V or the blitz SBC ID type R or i colour type R are the way to go.

getting one for rpm based mapping is really not necessary unless you actually wanted to DELAY boost spool up. and that's just silly! if you need less boost at any given moment, use less throttle. the Apexi AVC-R is over 10 years old now. the HKS and blitz ones I recommended are both only a few years old and have evolved from their older designs.

the bad news is, the SBC ID R is about $700 the (very) old school dual SBC is about $600, the i colour spec R is about $1000 (but I believe it does have boost/RPM mapping which would make the tuner happy, and it has LOTS of functions). The HKS EVC V has RPM map too if needed, it's about $800.

The trust profec B II is about $450, so it's a good $250 jump to the SBC ID, and about double to the rest. the old school SBC type R is guess is good value as it has dual solenoid and is only about $150 more than the profec B II, but I find the profec B II holds boost well enough, and looks quite nice, and once you get to $600 for the SBC R, you may as well spend the extra $100 for the SBC ID which is much newer, now you're at $700 abd you think, well the HKS is only another $100. now you're at $800 and you think, well the top of the line i colour is only another $200. all of a sudden you are double the price of the profec!

so where would I put my money? It would be between these 3:

profec B II

HKS EVC V (as it's new, just released less than 12 months ago)

Blitz I-colour type R (same as above).

Strewth! I think I owe you a beer for that post :devil: Much appreciated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...