Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As thread title suggests im wondering on the different engines in the s1 stags.... Mines a a '97 RS4 V (well call this car A) A mates (stagharts) has a '98 RS4V Dayz (car B) Both are series ones. Im aware that his is a later model than mine and would have been produced just before the s2's were starting to get pumped out...

Now today after doing some work on his car I've noticed a few things, His CAS is different to mine and he has a nipple on his plenum that I dont have. Is their such thing as a Series 1 RB25DET and a Series 2 RB25DET? If so what are the differences?

When i upped the boost on mine to 12psi with no computer or piggbacks it didnt rich and retard or miss at all. However stagharts car doesnt want to get much over 10psi and feels to be missing or R & Ring at full throttle and full boost. His coils are in OK condition with some evidence of them leaking spark. Will try my splitfires in their soon to see if it removes the jolting/miss feeling on WOT.

Picks of each part im talking about can be found here : http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Se...Va-t281219.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281266-sereis-1-stagea-engine-variants/
Share on other sites

its likely to follow the same suit as R33 GTST engine models, there are 3 known variants

series 1 = RB25det came in 1993 to 1995 GTST

series 2 = rb25det came in 1997 ish onwards

series 2.1 or series 3 or something else = came in 1998 R33 GTST

series 2.1 or series 3 or something else is RB25DET with ER34 CAS and some slight ER34 parts, but still R33 RB25DET

series 1 will have green or blue label AFM

series 2 will have pink label AFM

yep as per your pics

car a is series 1 rb25det

car b is series 2.1 or series 3 rb25det

theres 2 tenths of bugger all difference between them

the ECU differences are negligable and not even worth worrying about

the fact your doesnt hit R&R its pure luck, it might be a mangled/remapped/hacked ECU (likely)

the ECU differences are negligable and not even worth worrying about

the fact your doesnt hit R&R its pure luck, it might be a mangled/remapped/hacked ECU (likely)

So you think my car (car a) that doesnt hit the r & r has a hacked ecu?

theres a listed differences thread somewhere

the ECU differeces are bugger all, not even worth finding out what they are

the stock ecu is junk, dont even bother trying, remap, standalone or piggyback it

all stock ecu's r&R when airflow exceed's set levels

its not a fixed setting on boost, its based on airflow

it usually happens when you run around 10-12psi however

thats interesting... Mine never r & r as hard if any when i upped my bost.... And it was a stocker when i got it.....? Would supprise me if the ecu has been hacked to remove the r & r. Im now running a SITC and SAFCII anyway :) Just trying to sort out why his is r & r ing more... Might throw the timing light on his car and check the base timing for shits....

noooo paul....not for stageas. there are at least 3 ECUs in w34 series 1 stagea and they are very different in mapping / sensitivity to extra boost. And they all have different wiring looms. All use the S2 R33 GTST style motor with ignitors on the coil packs. Series 2 W34 is different again and may be the same as r34 gtt (not 100% sure though)

have a look for my thread re this in the stagea section.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jack the back of the car up, pull that wheel off, pull that sensor out, and put a bore scope into the hole to inspect the outer casing, see if anything looks damaged before you pull the whole thing apart.
    • Ergh... So I pulled the speed sensor out again and the tip was shiny so I think it's rubbing the bearing. The bearing contains the magnets for the speed sensor so I think when the first sensor broke it damaged the magnet ring on the bearing.  This is just a Google image, but there is a hole going to the bearing. So when the tip broke off the old sensor I'm guessing it fouled the bearing... As the magnet is only protected by a plastic cover it would be easy to damage it. So I guess I'm doing a bearing again.   
    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
×
×
  • Create New...