Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Well a few of you may have read a few of my bitches about the inconsistancy at regency, the uncooperative nature of those I have phoned and apparent differences between ADR interpretation in this and other states.

I intend to put together a submission requesting detailed repsonses to questions posed about these inconsistencies, such as

not being able to get a copy of ADRs prior to commencing mods,

a lack of guidance on the legality of mods,

people being able to get a certain mod passed no quesitons asked, whilst others dont,

why regency dont issue certificates to say specific mods have been inspected and correct,

why fittment of a different turbo requires a full emissions test,

when an AFM measures the air with total disregard for the turbo

why different people at regency give different answers as to legality of modifications

why a turbo timer is illegal (i was told you cant leave a car running and walk away, well you can do that with the ignition, and just because it is fitted doesnt mean you will, esp as it serves a purpose and I thought we were innocent until proven guilty.)

I could go on forever, I found the people at regency very uncooperative, esp when I asked what specific ADRs apply to certain mods and why they are illegal - I got a respoonse of 'it just is, we interperate the ADRs not you, we wont give you a copy because they are too complex and you wouldnt understand them.

What I would like is if anybody out there has come up against apparently inconsistant application of ADRs, for example whatsisname being told to remove a Momo steering wheel, whilst being able to keep a pillar pod.

If you have any crazy stories, or have been treaded poorly, please post up, but be very specific. It would be even more beneficial if you are willing to put in a Statutory Declaration, and have dates, times and names.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, I intend putting this submission in to the Attorney General's Office - and hopefully get SA out of the dark ages, and off our backs.

Cheers

Steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28160-regency-experiences/
Share on other sites

Is farting in the car defectable? only j/k :P

I do have a few burning questions though:

Is adjustable coilover defectable? Why?

Why is BOV defectable? Noise or emission? If emission then is using a filter to "catch the emission" make it legal?

Just be careful about this tactic Steve. It may backfire at us. I know 1-2 pple who work there. They are generally nice but they don't have much tolerance for embarassment. We better not stir them too much otherwise they will give us more sh*t.

We better take that NSW cruise before this lobby Steve :P Please don't turn up the heat too soon.

Atmo vent BOV is illegal, because it allows the crank case gasses to vent to atmo. ADRs clearly state that all vehicle emissions must exit via the exhaust system.

I understand that this is treading a fine line, but what else can you do? I am sick of it. the people I have spoken to have been very unco-operative, and condescending. When I asked what mods I could get passed they told me to just do them and then birng the car in - then they will tell me if it complies or not, or if I need to go to an engineer - I mean WTF is that all about.

they also told me that if an approved engineer certifies a mod, that doesnt mean they will pass it - what I would like to know is how in hell they can say that a member of SAE-A and IE Aust who has a degree in mechanical engineering, and is a certified engineer, know less than them? A mechanic who didnt want to work on cars anymore?????

They are totally out of control, and it just rubs me the wrong way that because they hold the cards they arent accountable.

It rubs me the wrong way when people are law unto themselves. I dont like just sitting back bitching about it and doing nothing. All it would take is one person to be wrongfully failed, and it leaves the gates open for legal action. And why not. If I do the wrong thing at work, I can be fined, or even imprisoned as I am a public servent and I have a duty to perform all my tasks legally.

If someone at Regency does their work properly, why would they be worried, all they are supposed to do is ensure that cars are roadworthy. The only people that have anything to worry about are those that dont enforce the law correctly - and just like anybody who is a part of officialdome, they have an obligation and a legal duty to do so - otherwise they can be taken to task by the law.

All I am saying, is that for too long it appears to me that too many people have been making up the rules as they go along - they are paid by our taxes and the fees that people pay to have cars inspected. WE are the customers, shouldnt we demand customer service? And if the state law wants to try and overrule ADRs, then they MUST have a good reason for doing so. If they dont, then a federal court can certainly bring them into line.

Its just not good enough - this is a democracy, lets exercise the rights that come with a democracy. Until people stand up and say enough, it will continue.

You yourself asked why you have to prove the legality of your car, when they cant prove its illegality, so why the big about face?

Its the little things that really shit me, an example is the turbo timer.

What the hell is so wrong with having a device to protect your engine? FFS even the manufacturer recommends you idle a turbo car for the specified period before shutting it down. BUT here, oh no, if you have a turbo timer you may leave your car running and walk away - next thing they will be putting 60kph speed limiters on cars because you may speed, but they will only do that to performance cars because if you owned a bog stock commodore you would never dream of speeding.

If someone leaves their car running and gets caught, sure give them a fine, just like if you speed, or dont use your indicator, but to regulate what can be fitted on the off chance that you may break the law - its just not right anyway you look at it.

It just shits me.

And to reiterate, if they are doing their job correctly, what have they to fear - nothing at all. A good shake up of the regulations will benefit everyone, and this is just that, obviously the regulations are not clearly defined in ADRs, because everyone interperates them differently.

Another example, I asked a guy if the fact that I had a bigger turbo was a problem, he told me to forget it, may as well take the car back interstate and sell it cos it will cost more than the car is worth.

I asked why, he told me cos emissions testing and engineers cert is so expensive. I asked why it needed a full engineer certificate and to be emissions tested - he got angry and told me that it is the law and dont be smart. I genuinely wanted to know why it made it necessary to have those things done, all he said is if it isnt OEM, they cant pass it? And he either didnt know or wouldnt tell me why? I asked where I could get a copy of the ADRs - he told me that they werent available, they were too technical and I wouldnt understand them, that was his job to interperate them (not the engineer HE had the final say). This is from someone who gave me he had the IQ of a rock ape. This is totally unacceptable.

Like I posted up before, I understand that some people wouldnt want their name brandished before anyone, so if you wouldnt be willing to write a stat dec, just say so.

Cheeky, I think that system is in place in NSW. BUT in NSW it costs bugger all to get something engineered.

This is another aspect I want to use, the fact that the govt is missing out on revenue, as in other states you pay to have mods engineered (at a reasonable cost) then take it to get the RTA to rubber stamp it. Costs nothing (to them), takes no time and raises money in the form of 'Stamp Duty'

It also means that people will have mods properly checked, this is a service to the public, instead of making the cost so exorbitant that now one will get mods certified, just stock out a car and then remod it after inspection. It makes a farce of the whole vehicle inspection process, and a mockery of the law, it also means that people are more likely to unknowingly have mods incorrectly done.

If you had to pay a 'certified' mechanic to perform mod (a mechanic who has been approved for standards compliance), then you could take the certificate from that mechanic to Transport SA, pay your $30 to have a piece of paper that tells the cops they can put their defect pad back in the glove box and go and chase some criminals - I dont think there are too many people here that wouldnt do it.

Most people that I know dont mind getting pulled over if they do something wrong, but when you get pulled over because you have modified a car by putting better suspension on, then get defected for having suspension that is beyond anything that is used by all but the best vehicle manufacturers in the world, and is light years ahead of locally produced OEM suspension, then have to remove it (why, is making a car perform better a crime - should get rewarded with reduced insurance, not penalised) it makes a car safer.

Vehicle mods are something that has been done since cars were first invented, it will never stop and you cant stop it, but you can make it reasonable, and serve the community by making sure mods are correctly carried out. By putting the cost of certification beyond the reach of the average person, they just wont get their mods certified - who does that serve?

People just thumb their noses at unreasonable rules, always have always will - they serve no one especially the law.

Bottom line is, all public servants, and all laws are there to serve the community, the laws that surround vehicle modifications serve no one. The police would be better off taking the time to serve a defect to patrol for criminal behaviour, the guy at regency would be better off if all he had to do was check what is written on the cert is infact what has been done, and the public would be better off if they had correctly modified cars on the road.

Hey the coppers might even find more time to defect the rust buckets out there.

Im in the worst ****en mood tonite so thought i could add to this discussion!

FIRSTLY, atmo BOVs are illegal on our cars according to regency, yet Trucks and busess all have ****n BOV's!

SECONDLY, according to regency, anythin above the dash, like gauges safc etc are illegal, yet taxis have all ****en shit all over there dashes and that is fine with the govt.

Man this is such a crock of shit. When i was at regency, the wanker was all like, hmm adjustable suspension, well we are gonna make that illegal soon. I was like wtf, why it improves handling and such. He was like we just are. They think they are ****en above the law or somethin it shits me so much.

Also i got defected for having front blocks (spacers) on my wheels. I was told at regency it is illegal cos it increase the distance from wheel to wheel that the manufacuter specifies. Yet interstate, block type spacers are not illegal.

Whats with the Nazi **** wankers in SA.

as far as I know trucks still have bov that vent back to the exhaust, where the Apexi ones and the like go to the atmosphere are a fire risk??? one cop even told me the bov was about legal dba limits and can be done for that. coil over shocks are fine, ANY guage that sits above the instument cluster that is not factory IS defectable. hope this helps. I had a list that a cop gave to me that they were defecting people on(bit it was in my car at the time of burning) cant remember everything sorry

Fully agree with you Steve... its definately not right that it is so inconsistent. It certainly appears that they just create new guildelines willy nilly as they see fit yet won't actually share with people what they are! Its one thing to have these rediculous restrictions in place, but its completely unacceptable that you aren't able to obtain a copy! And if you ring them up to find out something and can't/won't tell you, as far as i'm concerned they aren't doing their job.

The ONLY thing i can pick you on is the fact that if you get issued some sort of certificate stating your mods are legal and all pass regulations, what's to stop you re-modifying your car after to suit you and then flashing the certificate to cops etc?

There definately needs to be some standards put in place that are obtainable by the general public - jesus, we're the ones paying them!

That's a good point about the taxis and their instruments on the dash. How the hell can that be allowed yet gauges tucked away on the on the a pillar not be?

I think its excellent that you have the dedication to do something about it. I think any of us here would be happy to support you and offer assistance should it be required.

Sigh :(

Joolz

Thanks for the support.

A certificate provides a detailed description of the modification, and states that it has been inspected and complies with ADRs.

Of course people can change things, but if it is changed it would be apparent. And that is another thing that doesnt sit well with me. If a copper 'thinks' a mod is not roadworthy, he will send you to regency. That, to me, is on par with sending someone to court because they think you may have commited a crime - where is the burden of proof? If you get charged, there must be sufficient evidence that you have commited the crime, not just suspicion that you may have done something wrong - its just not bloody cricket.

MattR, that is an interesting point about the cop and dba limits. The only tests conducted to measure noise limits are done from the exhaust of a vehicle under revs, compare the noise of an exhuast brake or air brakes on trucks.

Half the problem is that cops go out without facts and slap defects on cars without knowing whether what they are defecting the car for is right or not. They need to be accountable IMHO.

Originally posted by GFXman

That's a good point about the taxis and their instruments on the dash.  How the hell can that be allowed yet gauges tucked away on the on the a pillar not be?

Joolz

I'm going to use that point if I ever get pulled over once I've installed my pillar mount!!

I had a taxi driver behind me this morning almost run up my behind about three times because he was too busy playing around with his computer mounted on the dash right in front of him!! Don't know how he can say that is not in his line of vision!!!! :(

Good to hear that someone is willing to make a bit of a stand on this, as its becoming a bit of a joke

Did you konw that cops have a book about defectable stuff for cars, and it has a whole scection on imported cars, what to look for, stock ride heights etc. It even tells the cops to look in the ashtray and on the strut tower area for boost controllers and turbo timers, what a bov is and looks like, stock front and rear track widths - everything!!!

Also, me and a few mates were having a chat with Martin Donnon at this years Autosalon, it was just after James from D1 had his car defected by mail after appearing in HPI, he told us that there is a traffic cop that has recentley moved from WA to here, and used to be into Skylines, and being a traffic cop he was pulling people over and lifting the bonnet stuff and defecting the really detailed stuff - like he'd see a Z32 AFM, and then pull out the kick panel to find your PowerFC, defect you for that, then look for boost controllers, adjustable suspension parts, adjustable castor rods - everything he could he'd defect people for - a real defect Nazi!!

But it would be great if we could get some real action about this, I hope you stick with it Steve

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...