Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just thought i'd share this for those that did't see it in the paper today..

Street racing and dumb driving by someone who does't deserve the car or licence. But i am sure he said it would't happen to me or

the street is where real drives do it lol what a joke....

He is lucky that no one killed... Doubt he will get insurance cause tyres bald... post-41401-1249285261_thumb.jpg

http://www.goldcoast.com.au/article/2009/0...coast-news.html

Just giving us Skyline owner enthusiasts a bad name .... What a Wank.....

Just my thoughts.. :P

post-41401-1249285228_thumb.jpg post-41401-1249285241_thumb.jpg post-41401-1249285280_thumb.jpg

post-41401-1249285292_thumb.jpg post-41401-1249285304_thumb.jpg

Edited by 99 GTT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281765-yet-another-hoon-destoys-a-skyline/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I used to live in the area & it doesn't surprise me at all. There were so many fully hectik sic racers in shit boxes who lived in that area that would think they were the best racer in the world & speed in the area.

Shame a nice car was written off & lucky that no one was seriously hurt. Especially an innocent bystander.

How did flip in the first place, how fast where they going?

The 2 driving should be jailed no questions asked.

This is gonna give more crap for TT & ACA to write about...

Let me get this straight, we should put people with murders, rapists and pedofiles for speeding in a car and crashing and no one getting hurt apart from the driver himself. Seriously WTF im sick of this shit, its getting so crazy in this country, soon you won't be able to fart without being given a ticket for $800 and 6 points. FFS

Let me get this straight, we should put people with murders, rapists and pedofiles for speeding in a car and crashing and no one getting hurt apart from the driver himself. Seriously WTF im sick of this shit, its getting so crazy in this country, soon you won't be able to fart without being given a ticket for $800 and 6 points. FFS

i know you were ranting, but that's so true and so funny.

Let me get this straight, we should put people with murders, rapists and pedofiles for speeding in a car and crashing and no one getting hurt apart from the driver himself. Seriously WTF im sick of this shit, its getting so crazy in this country, soon you won't be able to fart without being given a ticket for $800 and 6 points. FFS

I have seen the death of those idiots driving the cars and those who were innocent bystanders or passengers first hand.

Try justifying any sympathy for these fools after you spend your night attempting to resuscitate a victim not at fault who has a hole in their flail chest dying in front of your eyes from horrific head injuries, whilst the guy who caused the accident lies in a cubicle metres away with only moderate injuries by comparison.

This person is only lucky he didn't kill someone else.

I have seen the death of those idiots driving the cars and those who were innocent bystanders or passengers first hand.

Try justifying any sympathy for these fools after you spend your night attempting to resuscitate a victim not at fault who has a hole in their flail chest dying in front of your eyes from horrific head injuries, whilst the guy who caused the accident lies in a cubicle metres away with only moderate injuries by comparison.

This person is only lucky he didn't kill someone else.

I clearly stated that no one was hurt and if the driver kills himself too bad. If he killed someone innocent then I wouldn't be against a jail sentence, but for speeding and flipping his car and only injuring himself, cmon, we can't put everyone in the same boat, how many teens would be in jail with criminal records and their lives ruined just because they were speeding. They take the risk, because they don't think about the consequences but I don't think putting them in jail is the answer unless they do kill somebody, because you can't argue with that. Look at the laws now, they the strictest they have ever been, for god sake you go to jail for drink driving if you do it twice in like 2 years. Yet with all the harshest laws and penalties in place, there has been no improvement in the number of deaths on our roads and this is taking into consideration that cars have been getting safer and safer. So clearly harsh fines and penalties are not the solution. There are a lot of knobs out there that I would like to see of the road, like the morning retard who weaves through traffic, but jail is just to harsh. Just keep in mind what kind of people go to jail.

Some people do learn with their mistakes. It is human to make mistakes, stupid to re-commit them.

It was a dangerous accident and, with big chances, could have killed an innocent person. Jail will most likely not be considered in this case but a loss of licence would be not only be fair but also make the driver think twice before speeding again. That being on the drivers record, if there is a second time, jail would be more than resonable (PS: not necessarily share a cell/ have contact with murderes, rapists or paedophiles. There are different sections for different sentences). Strict legislation only apply to who deserves it/ take chances. Be smart, be safe, avoid a fine, do not worry about jail. Peace.

Why cant someone Invent A Cheap GPS System, that will be a must in all cars like Immobilizers. They will have all roads & Speed limits saved on a CHIP and if the driver tempers with it or goes above the speed limit then Info is sent to COPS or whoever. And the driver will need to go to court to prove the reason he/she gives for driving over the Limit.

maybe that way people can go to the tracks which may be not set in the GPS system and Pricks will stop Speeding on the roads.

Maybe its a crap Idea. But people racing on the roads need to grow up

Edited by SL33K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...