Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, was under the impression that the N1 water pump is a high volume water pump compared to the standard r33 gtr water pump, though, the N1 water pump has less fins than the factory pump.

N1 has 6.

Standard has 9 i think.

Therefore you would assume the more fins the better??

Can somone shed some light on this situation please?

Thanks guys!

the n1 is less volume due to the use of sustained higher rpm on high output engines or track use in general. The stock pump will flow the water around too quickly when using constant high rpm.

and the plate thats at the back is to reduce/stop cavatition also.

Hard decision to make when you are trying to make the engine reliable for track use, so you don't want it cavitating at high revs. But in reality it will probably spend most of it's life driving on the streets and depending on where you live, stop/start traffic, so you need a pump that flows well at idle/low revs

I'd reckon almost any car should use std not n1 pumps.

There are very few cars, even with track use, that do more than 3-5 laps flat out at a time.

Full on race car like my production car has one and it helps keep temps down (still too high), but that is up to 1 hr enduro at an average of 5-6000rpm.

yep I run an oversize pulley on mine as well as an n1 pump. and a flow restrictor in the hose. and a larger radiator with shroud. and distilled water with redline water wetter. depends how serious the cooling need is I guess.

One big issue with oversize water pump pulley is it will foul on the harmonic balancer which you need to cut back for clearance.

but the n1 pump isn't really "more efficient", there's nothing actually wrong with the standard pump in normal and spirited driving use. Its just when it's running 3 times faster all the time things get silly.

yep I run an oversize pulley on mine as well as an n1 pump. and a flow restrictor in the hose. and a larger radiator with shroud. and distilled water with redline water wetter. depends how serious the cooling need is I guess.

One big issue with oversize water pump pulley is it will foul on the harmonic balancer which you need to cut back for clearance.

but the n1 pump isn't really "more efficient", there's nothing actually wrong with the standard pump in normal and spirited driving use. Its just when it's running 3 times faster all the time things get silly.

I was referring more to the standard rb26 pump, it has more fins and flows more so by putting a larger pulley on you would simply slow the flow down slightly which is better for higher rpm driving. Probably in the middle of the two...

i ran an n1 water pump on my fairly modified rb26 in a stagea using the stock radiator that it come with (used to be rb25) and it was perfect in traffic and never ever ever got warm, i went in Motorvation local carshow and sat idle in traffic the supercruise with outside temps of 35 degrees + and it was perfect and other cars were cooking lol. I run an ATI 1000hp balancer which is very small compared to the stock one so it would be spinning even slower and still no issue.

i ran an n1 water pump on my fairly modified rb26 in a stagea using the stock radiator that it come with (used to be rb25) and it was perfect in traffic and never ever ever got warm, i went in Motorvation local carshow and sat idle in traffic the supercruise with outside temps of 35 degrees + and it was perfect and other cars were cooking lol. I run an ATI 1000hp balancer which is very small compared to the stock one so it would be spinning even slower and still no issue.

remmeber the 100hp ati balancer comes with a water pump pulley :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...