Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cheers for the input lads! :)

Still, not too sure which way to go in terms of turbos.. What are you running bubba?? Single? Twins? That is really the major factor, what to bolt up to a 15/18 or 15/30 setup... :devil:

Whoa I just noticed this MAJOR typo..

I meant 25/28 or 25/30... My bad... :(

That's the problem, rebuilding an engine is never quick, be nice to have a running car and build up a spare engine instead ;)

Building an engine is the fast part, custom turbo setups aren't. We did my original 30 conversion in a weekend, drive in - drive out.

Like a mate of mine. Owns a GTI-R pulsar with a spare motor sitting on an engine hoist in his garage, he cbf working on it anymore so when he'd finished paying it all off etc, he bought a 310rwkw S15..... damn. :D Think we'd all love to have something else sitting around just in case. As for me, it's the wifes Echo ... lolz.

That's why I have the Stag :down:

Cheers for the input lads! :)

Still, not too sure which way to go in terms of turbos.. What are you running bubba?? Single? Twins? That is really the major factor, what to bolt up to a 15/18 or 15/30 setup... :)

GT35R (0.82 exh) on a 6boost manifold with a 50mm Turbosmart Progate.

Id consider the Plazmaman plenum over the Greddy, simply as I like the design better and theres less copys floating about that you might get stung with. That and it's an australian company.

I'd say a 30 would be alot cheaper (depending on how you build it ) than the Tomei 2.8 kit if you were heading down that path?

Thats really all I have on the topic, other than maybe running a surge tank as well for the fueling system?

30 is definitely cheaper than a Tomei or HKS 2.8 kit.

I would steer away from the Plazmaman plenum for a twincam 30, they are only a replacement top half of the intake manifold (retains stock runners). You're really better off with the GReddy plenum to gain back some bonnet clearance. Matey has one on his 25t/30 and it makes the numbers just fine.

I'm running a custom plenum though due to non-turbo head (same stud pattern as RB20).

The dirty30 would be a very good choice.

properly balanced and an aftermarket balancer ross/ati they will rev to 8k

be considerably cheaper then a stroker kit too

Go with a big single to save alot on buying 2x the turbos,manifolds,etc

Have a read through Cubes thread. He has a low mount rb25/30 making 400hp? on stock manifolds (i think)

however engineering a rb30 and licensing it these days might be more of an issue over a rb25 with a 2.8 stroker

+1 for all that except the licensing.. theoretically, with this new emissions testing, you should be able to get anything registered aslong as it passes the emissions test.

I'm waiting for Spool to release their 3.4 cranks for RB30s, RB34= More of a good thing and still much cheaper than Jap 2.8s.

Strong early power makes for a much nicer and faster drive.

Ditto!! When they get released I'm thinking of building up a 3.4L for the 32 and putting the old forged 30 bottom end into the Stagea :D

Mark, Speaking from experience, anything more than 400rwhp in a RWD car is overkill, yes it's fun, but impossible to get grip. I've spent more money than any sane person would and personally I'd go for a smaller responsive turbo, peak power isn't everything, response and driveability are more important.

lol i happily swap motor setups with ur pauly :laugh:

+1 with Dsturbd, f**k off the 25 and put a 26 in it, if i could go back i would have done that in the 1st place

Edited by Kaido_RR

oi bubba, that turbo you're running on the dirty30, is it low of high mount?? As I said earlier, I'd dearly love to keep it low mount, which is why I was looking at an externally gated HKS 3037... What's your opinion on that one?

High mount Marco, was a bit too big and my power goals a bit too high to use stock manifold.

There are smaller turbos that will make the power you want, something like Pauls' turbo (3076?) with a bigger exhaust housing (for the 3L exhaust flow) might fit on stock manifold.

Hiflow is another option..

Not going to retain my manifold. I'll be going aftermarket.. Cost aside, I can't see any merit in retaining my stock unit... From what I've read going aftermarket can improve response anywhere from 200 or 4 or even 5 hundred rpm.. So for what I'm trying it do, is low-mount simply impossible?? I was hoping that I could get an aftermarket low-mount manifold (either off the shelf or made up), and then go for a 3037 and have it externally gated.. It is true that a 3037 is the largest possible turbo than can be low-mounted on a skyline??

Aftermarket low mount manifolds tend to be rather crap due to the space constraints. If you want a quality manifold then 6boost highmount is the way to go.

I also think a 3037 might be a bit small for a 3L.

Street driven, super responsive, 400rwhp I believe is what Marco said at the start of the thread.

As Bubs said (Although maybe not SUPER responsive, just 'rather' responsive would suffice! :P).. Although, I know I'm being vauge, but between 400 and 500.. Preferably closer to 400, but I'm assuming that is rather dependant on which direction I go in terms of turbos... I just don't want a lumpy, undrivable, peaky little b@st@rd... Another thing I said at the start of the thread that it wasn't so much a matter of HOW much power but HOW my engine makes that power.

So in a nut shell, with displacement increase, low-mount is basically out of the question?

Thanks guys, appreciating the feedback very much! :D

Paul would be the man to chat to if you are chasing those kind of figures in the RB25DET, he is the one who has been there and done it and figured out what works ect. Plenty of people love the 35R with supporting mod's and make around that 350-400hp number. Having 500hp tend's to break lot's of shit from my experience but it's great fun.

Edited by monga

IMO the 35R is a bit big for 350-400hp.. that's more GT30 territory, I'm hoping to make a shade over 500rwhp with my GT35R and be at least as responsive as Pauls GT30'd setup.

As for low-mount being out of the question, it's not so much the displacement that says that but the power goals.. physically fitting the turbo becomes an issue. Anyway, high mount looks better and it way easier to work on!

Edited by bubba

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...