Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Does his car have a stock 1/4 mile time in the 13 second range? No?

Neither does an R33?

Savin - are you saying the guy has both a Civic and an Integra or are you just trying to get a Honda vs Skyline thing going on? If its genuine, what does the Honda have done to them? Overall I'd lean towards the Skyline as having the advantage but it is potentially close enough it could depend on driver and mods

I think a hyundai excel would be the fastest out of the 3 :S ..... this is the stupidest question ive ever seen. The difference would be minimal completely depends on the driver. Just go to the strip and have a run.... just don't lose as you will never live it down hahahaha

Neither does an R33?

Savin - are you saying the guy has both a Civic and an Integra or are you just trying to get a Honda vs Skyline thing going on? If its genuine, what does the Honda have done to them? Overall I'd lean towards the Skyline as having the advantage but it is potentially close enough it could depend on driver and mods

A stock R33 does not, BUT one with:

i have a mate that wants to test it with me....spec= stock turbo, full exhaustt system, running on 10psi...And his car is merely a brand new integra type s and a civic type r

Does.

howdy partner

Not being quick to assume, just think these types of questions are pointless

not enough information, too many variables etc etc

I'm sure the OP has probably driven with and/or been in his car and his mates car at some stage. im no scientist but i'll have a stab and say that will give them an idea on what to expect.

maybe their gonna race at the strip and hes just looking for an idea on what to expect. dont be soo quick to assume cowboy
mate.. my stock gtst beat my mates Integra dc5r.. he had a few mods, still raped him like a goose. Reason why he sold his car.

Got video and/or time slips? Sounds unlikely unless he can't drive and you are a ninja.

i wouldn't be sooo sure about that. IF it was a DC2R then i would think you would have a real challenge and the S2000 is a bloody quick LITTLE car. stock for stock it would be quite close. they are very lightly little cars at the end of the day.

Chris

i wouldn't be sooo sure about that. IF it was a DC2R then i would think you would have a real challenge and the S2000 is a bloody quick LITTLE car. stock for stock it would be quite close. they are very lightly little cars at the end of the day.

Chris

The big problem with the Hondas, is they struggle BADLY above 80 - 100KM/h

They're quick off the mark, and through corners, but struggle above 100KM/h when stock.

The big problem with the Hondas, is they struggle BADLY above 80 - 100KM/h

They're quick off the mark, and through corners, but struggle above 100KM/h when stock.

LOL thats almost the opposite of my experience, FWDs are a bit disadvantaged as the weight is shifted off the driving wheels under acceleration and all the power is in the high end of the rev range - making them not that well suited to drag racing.

Here is the closest I can get, a JDM S14 Silvia (which are very comparable with R33 GTS25ts) against a JDM Type-R Integra, stock for stock. The Integra is only a 1.8litre version, the DC5s running the K20A make more power and torque stock, have better gear ratios and respond ridiculously well to modifications for an NA motor which already makes good power:

Edited by Lithium
The big problem with the Hondas, is they struggle BADLY above 80 - 100KM/h

They're quick off the mark, and through corners, but struggle above 100KM/h when stock.

I dont think thats true.. hondas aren't that great off the mark(except s2000) because they are FWD and those with powerful fwds will know what im talking about.

i know this is a lil off topic but my mate has a STOCK b18 crx and my skyline with a few mods would eat his dust over 100kms, but has it over him at the take off.

i have a mate that wants to test it with me....spec= stock turbo, full exhaustt system, running on 10psi...And his car is merely a brand new integra type s and a civic type r

as for your question, i beleive the skyline will win. The civic type R is not too much lighter than the r33 and wont have nearly as much power, i beleive they make 125-130fwkw in stock form and correct me if im wrong an r33 with the mods listed would make around 150rwkw?

Edited by Luke_GTS-T
I dont think thats true.. hondas aren't that great off the mark(except s2000) because they are FWD and those with powerful fwds will know what im talking about.

i know this is a lil off topic but my mate has a STOCK b18 crx and my skyline with a few mods would eat his dust over 100kms, but has it over him at the take off.

Out of the Honda's I've driven, they're just DEAD once you're out of 2nd gear...

1st gear, nice and short and snappy, 2nd gear not too bad... 3rd... just wayyyyyy too tall...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
    • Yes correct. Also, I'd avoid applying it to soft paint (however I doubt you'll ever have to deal with it in practice). So any paint that hasn't fully hardened, could be a 1k paint that never fully hardened or it could be a 2k paint that was laid down thick and hasn't yet fully hardened. 
×
×
  • Create New...