Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...
Dont really like it. You need a game controller to play it properly with throttle adjustments. Keyboard the accelerator is either on or off and it makes it impossible to even drift. So i vote fail.

Playing a driving game with a keyboard - I vote fail

EA and their glitchy games. I hate when a game is decent on a console, but is ported to crap for the PC. Perfect example was the latest James Bond EA did.

I haven't touched this game since Forza 3, most likely will just trade it in for credit for the next great game.

Anyone out there who has shift on their PC, and got disgruntled about various handling issues (such as driving on a trampoline)

... should reinstall it and download the new patch, because it makes massive improvements in overall game 'feel', making it infinitely more fun without destroying the 'realism' of the game. If anything it felt more realistic and more 'connected' to the cars you're driving if that makes any sense whatsoever.

Even if it doesnt, try the patch, makes the game well worth playing afterwards. :blink:

  • 4 weeks later...
Sorry to revive, but I just bought this and its absolute shite. Using the dualshock is impossible especially with analog. Hate the physics. GT4 shits all over this game. Im taking it back.

Yeah I found the physics with the controller impossible, just breathing on the right stick would cause me to slam into the wall...

Though changing the settings sensitivity practically changed the GAME!

something like these

Controller settings

might help...

Amph

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah ok. I seem to be mixing it like everyone else does so not sure what's happening. Will experiment with it more.
    • Depends on what you mean by OK. First up, was this done cold or hot? Are they reasonably consistent? Yes, they are reasonably consistent. Could be better. But unless it has had a build at some point, it is a ~30 year old engine and you'd expect some variation. Some of the difference could also be in user technique Is it good compression? Well....not numerically, no. New they were >160 psi. The one at 140 would be fine, in that context. If they were all ~140, you'd be reasonably happy. But the one that is @120 is twice as far down from the original numbers as the one @ 140. But.. (again)... technique can play a part in the absolute magnitude of these numbers, and the quality/state of repair/accuracy of the pressure gauge is not known. In the context of the above, the compression tester that was used last on my car is regularly compared to a known good pressure gauge. Not calibrated, exactly, but compared to a reference instrument that is not used for any other purpose, so cops no abuse. So we can trust the measurements off that tester. But another tester in the same workshop wasn't being compared against the standard and was reading a good 30ish psi lower. When you're reading 100 psu but the engine is really doing 130, you can make bad decisions.
    • More likely from tiny bubbles in the filler/putty. Maybe be less aggressive when mixing it. Perhaps invest in a vacuum chamber to pull the air bubbles out?** **I don't know if this is a thing for body filler. I see hardcore epoxy makers degassing their mixed resin on the regular.
    • IIRC, the speedo on these is fed from the sensor in/on the snout of the diff.
    • They were. I bought the AWD for experimenting but racing it would disqualify or disadvantage me from a few race classes. Def getting a FWD for racing.
×
×
  • Create New...