Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

doing my t belt and just pulled off seal for cams and crankshaft. just want to confirm if i have either the old or new style crankshaft, can barely see the oil drive(flats which engage the oil gear) the flats DO NOT extend beyond the oil gear, they are below the surface of the gear approx 3mm or 1/8 of an inch. however i have determined the width of the portion which contacts the seal is about 12 mm wide. i am not talking about the flats but the part of the crank which rides against the seal. obviosuly the smaller the width of the portion that rides on the seal the better because it yields a wider width for the flats which contact the oil gear. so my question is on the attached url there is a a diagram of the new and old style cranks shafts. distance "a" is representing the new and "b" is the old one.

i am hoping i have "a" crankshaft so can anyone pls kindly confirm that the dimension of width is is about 12mm or 13mm?????crank pics

Profile mentions 94 BNR32, so you should have the R33 crank. The flat part on R33 (ie. where the pump is driven by) should be twice the width of the early R32 crank..

Late 32/33 (good) vs. Early 32 (bad)

post-51527-1253176622_thumb.jpgpost-51527-1253176639_thumb.jpg

hey thanks for the reply however i believe my manufacturing date is in 93 so im not sure if i made it for the cut off

and who knows if the engine has been swaped or not but just saying u have to exprect the worst

but can anyone provide me with an exact measurement? ie give me the width of "a" or "b" which is in url of the first post???????????????

how wide is the part of the crank which rides on the seal? not the flats of the oil drive

Profile mentions 94 BNR32, so you should have the R33 crank. The flat part on R33 (ie. where the pump is driven by) should be twice the width of the early R32 crank..

Late 32/33 (good) vs. Early 32 (bad)

post-51527-1253176622_thumb.jpgpost-51527-1253176639_thumb.jpg

Edited by ck_chino

can't really tell until you have the oil pump off. once you do those pics will make it immediately clear. unfortunately you have to pull the sump off and crank out to find out

I am in exactly the same boat. I removed the front crank oil seal and thought I would be able to see the type of crank my car had. Just like you it told me very little even when sticking my head in there and taking photos. However I found from looking at the photos by sticking a small jewelers screwdriver into where the seal use to be you can see how deep the screwdriver goes before it hits the second lip of the crank. From the photos you can see that the older style crank would go deeper than the newer type.

I put the screwdriver in, marked how deep it went and measured it against the stroker crank I have. I found them to be the same. Thus I have the newer style.

Screwdriver should only go in about 12mm if it is the newer crank. If it substantially more than 12mm it is most likely the older style crank. Hope the photos attached help explain. I don't have access to an older style crank so I can't give any exact measurements however at a guess it would be 20mm+.

post-50114-1253655327_thumb.jpg

post-50114-1253655345_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • roof rail delete used to be a thing, they were made locally for a while too
    • I can get more photos of it here soon and I plan to make a thread detailing the process. I received the car this way and it sorely needs refinishing. That is probably the most appealing photo of it. Up close it is fading, cracked, and needs to be re-glued. Depending on their condition I'm on the fence between refinishing or making a new set.  Another angle hiding the pimples and razor pumps  
    • According to this thread the RS4V with build plate RC40 comes with the R200 diff @ 4.083 ratio as well (mine has said RC40 denotation). We may need to check if the axle stubs are the same pattern as well. The auto subframes have longer axles. However I think yours being a later Series 2 as well, we should have the same bolt pattern for the diff stubs. Unless your upgraded rear also has upgraded axles. Either way, I would not be opposed to pulling the covers to check so I can inspect that  fancy rear core  Also I don't have HICAS. I don't believe that should change things but I hope the people here with heaps more experience than me can correct me if I'm wrong   Let me know if you want to attempt to make this work and I can get some pictures of mine from under the car. 
    • It's not that straightforward. For example I have had this code because my ignitor/power transistor wires were unplugged. It knows something is wrong but has no idea what it means. If you want to actually diagnose this I recommend following the service manual flowchart for code 21. Ohm out the harness, coilpacks, inspect the ECU, etc. And again, it's entirely possible for there to be no problem at all but if you're running a different coilpack it'll trigger the code because it doesn't like what it sees.
    • If it (the code) wasn't still current, it should have gone away by itself by now. No, nothing it 10/10. But it is quite likely. Everything else to do with the ignition could still be responsible (which is wires and connectors). The car is an old piece of shit now, so all the wires and connectors are also old pieces of shit.
×
×
  • Create New...