Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, to cut a long story short i was pulled over last night and accused of doing 107 in a 70 zone which i know i wasn't doing. The police had a hand held radar and were hiding on the opposite side of a large 4lane road. There was another car that sped past mine in the exact spot he has accused me of speeding in. When i was pulled over i had asked to see the radar reading which i know he isn't legally obliged to show me but he said he couldn't because as he was getting into the police car he "accidently bumped" the radar gun and it cleared the reading. How is it that he can book me for speeding without any proof? He says he had the alleged incident on video, does this show speed if it's on video? I will be going down to the police station to see the video anyway. Also should probably tell you that he was hidden over the crest of a hill with no lights on. Is there anything i can do or is he legally allowed to book you with no proof? Thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/
Share on other sites

Did you get a written fine on the spot? or did he tell you he is going to send you one?

The only ways you can get out of it, if you honestly weren't speeding are one of these.

1 - Write to the address on the fine and explain your story. This is probably unlikely to get you off but doesnt cost anymore than a postage stamp.

2 - Opt to take it to court on the back of the fine. I'd suggest getting some legal representation for this, as in court the magistrate and DPP can be very pushy and daunting. You then have to prove that you were not speeding.....i.e. show with proof (or by showing doubt in the fact) that the cop had made a mistake

Importantly, write down your version of the story ASAP so you don't forget any details if/when it finally goes to court.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4855564
Share on other sites

thanks for the advice. I wrote down my version of events as soon as i got home so all the details were spot on. I will be making an appointment to view the "footage" at the police station, if it is shown that there is no hard proof of the incident can they revoke the penalty? I've never been done before and fined on the spot so i'm just confused.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4855676
Share on other sites

Also, if you've got a good driving record, you *MAY* be able to either get out of it with no recorded fine/conviction.

Please note, I did say *MAY*...

But, yeah, get some legal advice to clear it up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4856759
Share on other sites

**UPDATE**

I went to the police station tonight to view their evidence of my breaking the law.

All that the video footage shows is a group of cars driving past the police vehicle on the other side of the road.

There is no proof of speed, nor speeding or breaking any laws.

The cars featured in the footage are all travelling in a group (I do not know these other cars).

So basically, there is no proof of speeding and why the officer singled out my vehicle I'm not sure.

Probably as it's the only one with P plates on it (It's n/a & legal)

WHat do I do now :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4857125
Share on other sites

I think all you can do is really just ask the question, how do they determine which car was travelling at what speed? Like in a completely non-smartass way, ask the question and let them know you're unsure how it works.

If there's a laser-lock or something, you're screwed, but if all they have is a bunch of cars driving along and they've gone BAM it's you, then that's just not right.

Is there a speed on the video at all? If the gun they have has lost the reading because of being "bumped", they don't have a shred of evidence to say how fast you were going. As long as you're sticking with the crowd and not accelerating past them, you should be sweet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4857155
Share on other sites

There is no evidence of speed what so ever because the radar didnt lock in the "supposed" speed I was doing because he bumped it.

The video shows a group of cars drive past, all travelling at what appears to be similar speed... nobody is accelerating past anybody else.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4857161
Share on other sites

Yeah, unfortunately he said it's based on what the cop "saw". So his word vs yours, basically.

The only way you're gonna get anywhere with this is in court. If he hasn't locked in the speed....

Only problem is court fees can sometimes cost more than the fine, which is bullshit. They waste your time, then you have to pay to make your name good.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4857171
Share on other sites

**UPDATE**

I went to the police station tonight to view their evidence of my breaking the law.

All that the video footage shows is a group of cars driving past the police vehicle on the other side of the road.

There is no proof of speed, nor speeding or breaking any laws.

The cars featured in the footage are all travelling in a group (I do not know these other cars).

So basically, there is no proof of speeding and why the officer singled out my vehicle I'm not sure.

Probably as it's the only one with P plates on it (It's n/a & legal)

WHat do I do now :)

I'd take it to court if time permits.

If you represent yourself, and it goes against you on a copper's word, the court cost isn't that great.

I'd try and get the question subitted as to what speed the HP officer thinks you were doing & where's the proof?

If you take a legal rep (solicitor) and lose, the solicitor's fee costs more than court costs.

You MAY still get off due to a good record in which case the fine MAY be waived BUT you may still incur points.

If you take a legal rep along & win, you lose no points, there's no fine; but there's the solicitor's fee.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4857324
Share on other sites

So by the cops reasoning, the entire group of cars must have been doing 107, if the whole group are clearly shown in the video going at the same speed.

That just seems strange to me... not very often that a bunch of cars who do not know each other all decide to do 37km/h over the limit :)

Seems a lot more likely that you'd all be doing very close to the actual limit..

Maybe you could mention that in your defense if you fight it?? How fast so you think you were going? Like 80 or something? Maybe he was trying to get you to admit to speeding by accusing you of a higher figure?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4857378
Share on other sites

i spoke to my lawyer today who i will be speaking to properly at his office. He seems to think they have little chance of winning if i contest it in court. The court fees and solicitors fees don't really bother me, it's more so to prove a point that he should NOT be able to do this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4858572
Share on other sites

Just curious - are you on your Red or Green p's?

From what you have said, it looks like you have a good chance winning in court due to the lack of "proof" and the fact that all these things are taken into account

1) "Bumped radar" so no speed (I know that this does genuinely happen though.. and is quite common).

2) Footage - group of cars.. no direct speed/proof you were doing x speed.

AFAIK a HWP officer is trained to "determine speed". And this is permissable in court. So if you drive past a HWP cop who has no radar/lidar evidence etc they have been 'trained' in determining speed.

I guess this factor, and at the end of the day its your word vs the cops are the only downfall... IF you do fight this, definitely use a Solicitor.

I regret never fighting my 1st speeding offence.. still makes me angry to this day lol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/290142-advice-needed/#findComment-4859272
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...