Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all just need some quick rb25 info as im new to them and dont know much about

them have always had rb30et's ok so first i have just bought a vl with a 1996 r33 s2 rb25

conversion done in it mods are 3 inch exhaust and cooler using standard r33 ecu

ok well it was only running standard boost 7psi but i just bought a boost tee and put

it up to 11-12psi now i know they only have a ceramic rear wheel so how much boost am

i safe to run ?? and how much power have ppl gotten out of just few simple mods like mine

and whats acheivable with standard turbo dont wanna upgrade just yet but yer just really

wanna know the boost one before i go driving it to much on 12psi any info is muchly appreciated

thank you all RBJ37

IIRC the series 2 turbos can handle a bit more boost.

Dunno where, but I definitely saw that somewhere.

Still wouldn't go past 12 pound...

With all that, you should be looking at about 180-220rwkw depending on the tune.

If i were you, id be getting a tune, so you can really enjoy the benefits of the increased boost.

[EDIT] my mate has a RB25 (series 2) in his patrol, and runs 12psi daily, no issues. He was at 15psi for a while, and that poor little turbo is still going fine...

Edited by turbo x-trail
IIRC the series 2 turbos can handle a bit more boost.

Dunno where, but I definitely saw that somewhere.

Still wouldn't go past 12 pound...

With all that, you should be looking at about 180-220rwkw depending on the tune.

If i were you, id be getting a tune, so you can really enjoy the benefits of the increased boost.

[EDIT] my mate has a RB25 (series 2) in his patrol, and runs 12psi daily, no issues. He was at 15psi for a while, and that poor little turbo is still going fine...

thanks heaps for the info but how can you get a tune with a standard ecu ?? what just timing and what not

im not to sure with these 25's and there comps i only know rb30et's as thats all i have ever used i know you cant

do much with a standard vl turbo ecu are 25 comps much different ?? i got nothing to tune only standard ecu ??

My advice is leave the timing alone(15).

Save up and get a power FC or get a nistune. Might want to turn the boost down to 9-10 if youre going to be taking her to the track.

i was actually just thinking about goin to see my good mate rick at efi performance and was thinking

bout goin with a nistune and maybe using a z32 airflow meter as i have heard they are the best to use

and will support upto about 500hp ?? and for about 950 fitted and tuned the nistune is best bang for the

buck i reckon what is everyones thoughts on even just using maybe and safc and maybe e boost2 or

something was thinking maybe just goin that way as i would be happy with 200rwkw for the mean time

till i upgrade to 35/40 and all the rest of the goodies :) and would 11 psi be ok for the street with standard

turbs thats what it is on atm cant hear any pinging or anything of the sort so think should be ok maybe till

i get a power run and afr to make sure everything is ok.........

12psi is fine. aslong as base timing is set properly and everythings working as it should then it wont knock on the standard ecu, way too much fuel and not enough timing. for nistune on a 25 you need to use a r32 or z32 ecu, z32 allows you to keep vct but requires a few wires to be changed around.

Running 12 psi on your stock turbo is fine wouldnt go over though. With your current mods... i know with a PFC stock turbo you'l be achievable of doing 180-200kws. With stock ECU maybe 160-170's range.

12psi is fine. aslong as base timing is set properly and everythings working as it should then it wont knock on the standard ecu, way too much fuel and not enough timing. for nistune on a 25 you need to use a r32 or z32 ecu, z32 allows you to keep vct but requires a few wires to be changed around.

well i have set on just 11psi so wont push it anymore then that might go for a highflow very soon as my mate

works for mtq here in brisbane and builds turbos all day haha get myself a brand new highflow for about $400 :)

pretty sure base timing should be ok seems to run fine just not as fast as i would thought it to be i think there

might be another little problem as if you put your foot flat to the floor it doesnt really wanna go anywhere but if

you just ease it on slowly it starts moving really need to get a tune and check timing anyway how do i do that

on a rb25 as they are a lil diff to rb30's ??

and does anyone have a z32 comp they wanna sell me so i can do a nistune comp

if anyone has one let me know price and shizz i can get one for 250 but just seeing

what else i can get cheaper thanks ppls

you dont need a Z32 afm for 200 rwkw and stock turbo, just nistune the board with stock afm and it will be sweet

yer i know that i sed has anyone got a z32 ecu for sale and i have been told no point doing the

z32 airflow meter till i do injectors so all is good just need ecu and i will use the standard 3 pin afm

till i upgrade turbo and injectors :P

oh sorry i read wrong.

Personally i would just remap a 32 ecu, disregard the lack of VCT as once the ecu is tuned the loss of VCT is not at all noticable

i have heard that you can notice it a lil bit in the midrange ??

depends on the tuner.

When mine was tuned, it made more power everywhere in the rev range, so a loss of midrange was not noticed or even evident at all when compared to the stock map.

that said ive driven some set ups with utterly shit tunes on them and they feel like a dog to drive down low but go hard up top. thats because theres plenty of tuners out there who are shit at anything but focusing on WOT maps.

depends on the tuner.

When mine was tuned, it made more power everywhere in the rev range, so a loss of midrange was not noticed or even evident at all when compared to the stock map.

that said ive driven some set ups with utterly shit tunes on them and they feel like a dog to drive down low but go hard up top. thats because theres plenty of tuners out there who are shit at anything but focusing on WOT maps.

hmm interesting well thats really good to know that its only in the tune :P quite funny how the vct doesnt have

any affect really if the tune is altered haha hmm anyways i will see how i go wen the time comes to put the nistune

in wich will probably be in the next 3 to 4 weeks :ermm:

and a graph of what happens when you run too much boost with a standard ecu, on a s1 anyway. vtec yo

http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd251/J...17052008009.jpg

as for not going anywhere, is it blowing out spark?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...