Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmmm. I might just go with a 265/35 in the KU36. For under $500 delivered for a full set of brand new semis you cant beat that

Damn thats cheap can you send me a PM in regards to where your getting them from....i am looking for new tires too mate

thanks

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ROR Scandy.......if you like that shit, you must like blokes too.

Normal peeps prefer the girls in the 1st part of the vid.......each to their own weird fetishes I suppose.

lol. havent checked the vid yet. been too busy browsing the pics. :D

can someone pick up something for me from Woodville North??

has to be picked up today unfortunately and i am not in adelaide, there is a 6pack in it for ya and i will take it off you on saturday? PM me asap

I wouldnt bother.

the RB25 will munch the RB20 box in no time, do it right teh first time and go a whole 25 package.

ask Ryanrb25, find him on face book, he usually happy to help with any questions you have.

just dont expect him to do it for you :D

Thanks. Ive been told by more than 1 person you can use a 20 box on 25 providing you're gentle and don't use a twin plate clutch...

Anyway found out the answer to the tail shaft question this morning.

My attention is now on how to get it registered.

i would also keep in mind to upgrade your brakes while your doing the 25 conversion Dion

yeah, just trying to do some homework.

Will probably end up with another 20 because for the price of the 25 package I can have a 20 with a hks 2530 on it... Stock 25 vs. 20 with 17psi....

ugh. its midday. i gotta be up for work at 5:30, but instead of doing the smart thing and sleep, im reading questionable content and listening to portishead.

Shame he doesn't drive it hard enough to need them :rolleyes:

badum tish.

Engine oil: check

Oil Filter: check

Coolant: check

pwr steer fluid: check

Gbox oil: check

Hopefully thats all I'll need to swap these 20s over in the Sil. Also have got a new exh mani gasket cause I'll be using the turbs off the old 20.

Bring on the weekend! Hoping to have Craigs 20 running in my car by sunday night.

Edited by AndrewJZX100
yeah, just trying to do some homework.

Will probably end up with another 20 because for the price of the 25 package I can have a 20 with a hks 2530 on it... Stock 25 vs. 20 with 17psi....

umm 25 with 12psi boost for me did really well......stock 20 wont make as much power as you think Dion

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...