Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

called tech support, they made me discconnect my phones which got me to 2.3mbps

my vodafone shit just hit 5.10mbps!

blah! GAY

Do you have a home alarm system, or cable TV...how many phones you got connected to your phone line?

As these can interfere with the ADSL. Every phone needs a filter, and then you can only use 3 filters, after which you need a central filter splitter. If you have a monitored home alarm system or cable TV you are going to need to ring them and organize to have a filter installed. I would also suggest getting rid of the Belkin ASAP, billion FTW, get a Billion 5200G ~$129, or better yet a 7300GRA ~$139, prices off the top of my head.

This should be in the computer thread for future reference I suppose but I've got the Netgear DG834N....how do they fair in relation to Billion & Belkin Abe?

i also happen to use a netgear router (cant remember the model number) and so far its done me good....

Dave won't receive a summons for "speed dangerous" (even though it's warranted for 45kph over).

The $600 fine, 6 demerit points & 6 mths loss of licence is actually a very good outcome for the cops.

I advised Dave to return the cops phone call immediately (to make their life easier) without any admission which is what they want from you when they ring.

For them to serve him a "speed dangerous" now, it would tie up the courts and further govt expense for possibly not necesarily a better outcome than they have on the table now. There have been lawyers that have argued the "proof of driver" deal before and although the "speed dangerous" is then dropped, they still result in loss of licence & fines.

If Dave on the other hand said, "yeah that was me driving", he'd expect another visit me thinks.........whenever you are 45kph over, you'll always get a phone call or visit 1st for that very reason.

I am JUST about to go onto my P2's... and I think I might be getting in trouble again. Gotta goto court... FFS S13. Got impounded on 1/1/10 lol. Heaps awesome kick off to 2010 :(.

The cops were actually pretty good and he said I shouldn't have anything to worry about in court but we will see how I go :\ I'm never getting off my f**ken P's lol

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...