Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It was running 12psi.

Theres a thread in the general maintenance section about yellow jacket coilpacks, quite a few people have them and havent had a problem.

yeah i started to look at that but got sick real quick of hearing " yeah i ordered them today, hope there good" " yeah im going to get them tomorrow" "yeah i put them in they are good" wanted a little more than that lol

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah i started to look at that but got sick real quick of hearing " yeah i ordered them today, hope there good" " yeah im going to get them tomorrow" "yeah i put them in they are good" wanted a little more than that lol

friend of mine was running them and his 33 was putting out 330rwkw and didnt have a problem with em

What company did you end up using?

Engine is finally about to be done and they need the car there monday. :whistling:

My mate, put me onto this guy,

Name is Dave and number is 0413 360 666

Will see how well he goes on Saturday.

Nice work Damo.

What is the best way to prep a front bumper and filler panel?

I assume its sand it right back, then get it coated in primer, then a layer of paint?

Also..who here has some spray painting experience?

My front bar looks like absolute crock at the moment...stupid Toyota Yaris'.

Thats ok Dave,

I'll wave at you on..err....what number is the bus you catch?

:teehee:

depending on the day, the 441, 228f, and/or g10. good luck with that though, even walking i make more torque than your car. :whistling:

depending on the day, the 441, 228f, and/or g10. good luck with that though, even walking i make more torque than your car. :whistling:

369.6nm at 5500.

the .6 probably wont power my cd player.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-az1smQMWHYk/unsafe_driving/

Dont know if this is a repost or not but u should watch it. Pretty graphic

I think I saw this posted all over Facebook the other week, just watched it then...some of it was very sickening.

Yeah couldn't even watch the bits of kids being run over .... being a father that cuts you very deep - I don't even know how parents deal with losing children.

And on a lighter note .... :blink:

post-669-1279112120_thumb.jpg

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-az1smQMWHYk/unsafe_driving/

Dont know if this is a repost or not but u should watch it. Pretty graphic

Yeah couldn't even watch the bits of kids being run over .... being a father that cuts you very deep - I don't even know how parents deal with losing children.

And on a lighter note .... :blink:

thanks for posting that Luke its a very graphic reminder of how stupid we are as humans, and a reminder to me that it can happen to anyone

i know some of it is fake out of movies but there is over 50% of it real footage, it really needs to be shown as a 5 min commercial once a day in prime time but the problem with that is retards aka bogans would just laugh and make fun of it due to desensitisation

thanks for posting that Luke its a very graphic reminder of how stupid we are as humans, and a reminder to me that it can happen to anyone

i know some of it is fake out of movies but there is over 50% of it real footage, it really needs to be shown as a 5 min commercial once a day in prime time but the problem with that is retards aka bogans would just laugh and make fun of it due to desensitisation

All too true. It can happen to ANYONE.

Few people have been around a fatal accident. Even fewer having to hold and comfort the poor soul as they passed. Its something you certainly do not forget.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...