Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The crank is lined up EXACTLY with the mark on the oil pump... i used a mirror to make sure it lined up properly.... even turned the engine a million and one times to get all three white marks on the belt to line up too!!!

post-42272-1256337715_thumb.jpg

I posted the pics of the balancer also.... what do u think of its condition???

That mark is not perfectly lined up.

Turn it another degree clockwise.

If you are really worried about it why don't you use a dial indicator and check when you piston is at TDC to verify your marks etc? then you may be able to adjust your marks on your front cover to suit exactly.

No need for all that.

I PM'd Smell a while back to find TDC via a piston stopper and remove all this balancer guesswork.

Time to move on.

how about posting that info here?

Not really the right section but....

A piston stopper is nothing more than a means of stopping No 1 piston before TDC, usually a modified spark plug or similar.

Take the usual precautions regarding cleanlines etc.

Rotate the crank until the piston touches the stopper and mark the balancer (or your degree wheel) against a fixed point.

Rotate the crank the opposite direction until the piston touches the stopper and mark the balancer against that same fixed point.

TDC for No 1 will be halfway between those two marks.

The larger diameter of your degree wheel improves your accuracy but even the balancer's diameter is better than the tiny crank gear.

Well guys some new info on this.....

I fabricated and used the piston stop as grigor suggested and i must say it worked a treat!.... so much so that i realized that my balancer has NOT rotated and the orange 0* mark lines up at TDC mark on the backing plate when the engine is in fact at TDC.

So now if i use the orange 0* mark on the balancer to get the engine to TDC none of the marks, ie. crank neither cams line up with their respective marks on the backing plate.... they are all just a tad too much clockwise.

I don't' have pics of the crank, but the reason why i say it would be a tad too much clockwise is because when all three dots line up perfectly including the three white marks on the belt and when i slide on the bal it reads about 4-5* advance , so obviously when i now turn the bal to get it back to the 0* mark all three gears would have rotated clockwise some.

Have a look at these pics with the balancer set to 0*

Notice the mark on the backing plate is just off the tooth of the gear and not dead center

Intake

post-42272-1256949696_thumb.jpg

Exhaust

post-42272-1256949837_thumb.jpg

TDC

post-42272-1256949967_thumb.jpg

I even took it to a mechanic and he was puzzled as well to see when he lined up all three marks and put the bal back on it read 4-5* advance..... so i know i'm not crazy!!!

Yeah and the backing plate is mounted on rubber inserts so it could be off too. And the lower timing cover could be off as well as it's in rubber washers too.

You should go and buy all new parts and fit them, that way you can find out that you are making a huge deal over nothing and none of it will matter when the engine is running.

Also, take the shot of the cam gear from front on, not at an angle. Make sure it's parallel. Taking shots from an angle distorts the ability to view it for every degree it's off. Considering you are chasing 2-3 degrees then this is very important

I am definitely not a mechanic but all rbs i've changed timing belts on before had all timing marks lined up spot on and the bal on 0* at TDC ..... i mean Nissan would not have but those marks there if they didnt intend on you to use it would they????

My thoughts, as sent to Smell, are that he’s now reached manufacturing tolerances and anything closer will require adjustable cam wheels.

Obvious stuff like a decked block or shaved head have been eliminated as the cams would have retarded not advanced.

A thicker than factory head gasket also seems unlikely.

Can’t recognize the marks on the cambelt but I don’t like thicker than factory aftermarket cambelts as they advance cam timing due to the extra thickness over the idler.

I dug out a few Nissan belts and the root of tooth to back of belt is constant at approx 2.3mm

However the top of tooth to back of belt varies from 5.2 to 5.6mm.

15thou mightn’t sound like much but it doesn’t take much extra at the idler to advance the cams.

Gates belts are another story.

post-13483-1256960496_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...