Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Steve.

So whats the peak power you now have.

Ben, Try it with the smaller exhaust a/r first. The tests tim has done has shown that it makes bugger all difference with the larger a/r unless you are up over 650-700hp. Depends if you want more power in the last 1000rpm of your rev range or would prefer more power in the 3000rpm prior to that last 1000rpm. Bolt it in and see how it goes.

Well I am not going for insane power at high RPM.. 400rwhp with great torque even would be great for a start. It is a street car.

Im not to sure on what affects it? .69 AR with a 50mm exaust wheel? How does A/R compare to wheel size?

As for my manifold, the Subzero one I have actually a split design also... goes from 2 lots of 3 into 2 and straight to the turbo.

Is it vital to have a matching turbo with split entry design? or am I now forced to get the proper turbo or another manifold..

Damn more things just keep proping up...

I took some more photos to compare etc. I tried to take some of the exhaust fins on the dual entry T88 but I couldn't get it to show up. The fin design is rather different to that of a single entry turbo. I would imagine mixing the two would cause problems..

Subzero Manifold.

2.jpg

Subzero1.jpg

Subzero2.jpg

Trust T88 Turbo.

Turbo.jpg

Turbo2.jpg

Single inlet T04.

T04.jpg

Sorry if the links disappear.. free host.

It depends on the turbo, not all trust and HKS turbos are built like that (called split pulse), but of course some are. Usually seems to be the big hp turbo setups, which would alos explain the longer pipe design as they are built to perform at the top end.

Ben, just noticed another interesting thing, the sub zero manifold has grouped sequentially firing cylinders to each side of the split - I am thinking along the lines of what happens in my manifold, ie the pulses will collide with eachother and possibly cause back pressure? Or am I mixing up the firing order/grouping of the runners?

The nissans fire 1,4,2,5,3,6 dont they? Looks like the Jap manifold seperates the grouping.

The firing order for the RB is 153624. Thanks for pointing that out, I never considered it.

So looking at the manifold, it will fire. Right, Left, Right, Right, Left, Left.

The HKS manifold seems to just bank 3 from each side.

Getting really confused with all this.. I guess all I can do it try things and see what happens.

Quite interesting though. :rofl:

Dont want to sound as though im assasinating parts on your car, but the welding on that manifold isnt the best...it has a fair bit of undercut/or excess penetration. You can see the variance on overall diameter at the weld.

Subzero2.jpg

Depending on the wall thickness and the unsuported weight of the turbo on the manifold, then you may find that this manifold may be a lttle more susceptible to cracking.

.69 AR with a 50mm exaust wheel? How does A/R compare to wheel size?

A/R, area/radius. So its a ratio of the area of the hole through the housing, and the distance from the area's centre to the centre of the turbine wheel.

As its only a ratio, it doesnt mean a 0.69 Housing from a GT25 is the same size as a 0.69 housing off a GT30, as obviously the turbine wheel on the GT30 is goin got be larger in daimeter.

Meaning that the radius (length from centre of area to centre of turbine) is going to be larger for a GT30 to accomodate the larger wheel. In turn as the radius is going to be larger the Area will have to be larger to maintain the ratio of 0.69...making sense?

Thanks for that ROY.

I know the welding on the manifold isn't the best.. I just had a GTR head and that manifold was attached.. so it's better than having nothing right? :rofl:

It had a very heavy turbo attached... and didn't seem to hurt the manifold too much.

The HKS one above had a couple of small cracks with the T88 attached.

Is there anything I can do to the SubZero manifold to improve the welds??

So a T04 with a 50mm exaust wheel and an A/R of .69 is rather small?..

Steve, Sorry to here about your dramas:( I have a custom manifold with a GT30 (0.64housing) and it's making over 300rwkw. Mine is still stock cams, stock headgasket. I'm personally not entirely convinced that it is the manifolds fault, as my mate has the larger housing on his and it's not nearly as laggy as yours.

Hi Steve, can I just make sure I have the facts right...

Previously, 0.61 A/R, 9.0 to compression, standard cams, standard cam timing, boost at 3,000 rpm, max power 256 rwkw at 1 bar.

Now, 0.87 A/R, 8.6 to compression, 256/8.8 inlet & 264/9.0 exhaust cams, exhaust cam timing 6 degrees retarded, boost at 3,700 rpm, max power ? rwkw at ? bar.

There are a couple of bits of missing information (or maybe I simply missed them), plus you don't mention ignition timing. The lower compression ratio should have allowed more advance. How much? On the other hand it will have cost you around 250 rpm in boost build, of the 700 rpm you have "lost".

My humble opinion, I don't think it has anything to do with the length of the primary pipes. I have previously done back to back with a standard RB20 manifold and a GTSR tuned length (low, rear mount) manifold. It made more power everywhere and I don't think you could get longer primary pipes than a GTSR set.

Maybe fill in the missing bits of data if you can, but my guess right now would be something else is wrong. Unless the manifold has very severe interference problems. But that seems unlikely given the previous results.

What I would do;

1. do a leak down test

2. check the ignition timing with a timing light every 1,000 rpm from 2,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm.

3. Measure the primary pipe length and ID and feed it into any of the online exhaust design software. That will tell you the tuned rpm for your size of engine. It should also tell you the severe reversion rpm's (there should be 3).

4. If none of the above sheds any light, then I would stick the standard cams back in at standard timing.

5. Then work your way through the stages.

Hope that helps.

Ben, by comparison the HKS GT3037 has a 84mm exhaust wheel. I suppose you could say ARs are not ARs:)

Correct me if I am wrong, transposition of formula:

A/R = .69 therefore, A= R x .69

By increasing the Radius, the Area will therefore increase too, to use arbitary figures:

if R = 30mm, x .69 = an Area of 20.7

if R = 45mm, x .69 = an Area of 31.05

Add to these figures that you have a bigger exhaust wheel, and quite possibly a bigger exhaust opening, and you can see that a small turbo with an AR of 0.8 could be alot smaller than a bigger turbo with an AR of 0.6

So it is probably a bit inaccurate saying a certain size AR is suitable for a specific hp IMHO.

Ben, by comparison the HKS GT3037 has a 84mm exhaust wheel.  I suppose you could say ARs are not ARs:)

Correct me if I am wrong, transposition of formula:

A/R = .69 therefore, A= R x .69

By increasing the Radius, the Area will therefore increase too, to use arbitary figures:

if R = 30mm, x .69 = an Area of 20.7

if R = 45mm, x .69 = an Area of 31.05

Add to these figures that you have a bigger exhaust wheel, and quite possibly a bigger exhaust opening, and you can see that a small turbo with an AR of 0.8 could be alot smaller than a bigger turbo with an AR of 0.6

So it is probably a bit inaccurate saying a certain size AR is suitable for a specific hp IMHO.

The HKS 3037S or 3037 has a 60mm large and 55mm exducer diameter, exactly the same as the GT30 series Garrett, again, it's all on http://www.hksusa.com/categories/more.asp?id=1092

The 84 refers to trim (which is small diameter squared divided by large diameter squared x 100). Plenty of Garrett sites to confirm numbers.

But anyway, it's all gotta add up to less turbo response at low RPM...lower comp ratio, larger duration cams (particularly exhaust), larger A/R exhaust housing. As we know things get magnified on turbo engines and are cumulative. Really the only thing that may have helped broaden the power range is the increased cam lift.

GTS-T VSPEC, What boost are you running to achieve that power? I assume you are runing stock pistons as well. I have GT30/40 with stock exhaust manifold, internal wastegate, stock head and pistons. I have 253rwkW at 17psi with 15° timing and 11.8 a/f ratio and want to start pushing it harder and need to go the next step.

Steve, great thread, good on ya for opening up discussion.

paul, I know that something is wrong, I am not saying the longer runners are the entire fault, and I agree that boost should be alot earlier than where it is, even with a manifold with longer runners (although they will make a difference to how boost is made). I am thinking that there must be some sort of crazy interferance happening where the runners join - what else could it be? If you know something I dont, please do tell.

freebaggin, oops, my bad, it was late and I was tired when I posted that one, sorry for the misleading info.

Sydneykid, 1 bar of boost now happens at around 5000rpm, so lag has increased by 2000rpm. Positive boost doesnt start building until just before 4000rpm.

Richard who tuned the car, and has done a couple in this trim, said he couldnt understand why it was taking so much ign timing, didnt say exactly how much, but did say 20odd degrees more than he would expect. He did a great job of improving off boost driveability and getting the lag down - before he started it was around 800-1000rpm more lag.

I dont know what rwkw, it hasnt been on a dyno, only street tuned.

Before I go replacing the cams, I will change the turbine housing, Richard said he wants to have a good look at the manifold - which is understandable, next will be the inlet cam, then the exhaust cam. Only thing delaying me is that I paid over $1700 more than I was quoted to get the cams etc changed, and with christmas around the corner, well it may be a back seat for a while.

If it isnt the manifold, what the hell could it be? Cams are a good thing, turbo is a good thing, head gasket has the CR above a GTR CR, so it wont be hurting things too much. The 0.87 is the recommended AR for that turbo for the street (by HKS) and shouldnt useable boost in after 4000rpm, which is where I need to get it back to.

Steve, one thing you can do yourself for minimal cost is go out and get yourself a degree wheel and a cheapie dial indicator.

Without actually changing anything, find out exactly where the inlet and exhaust valve opening and closing points are.

I still think the engine is not producing enough exhaust flow. Excessive advance requirement strongly suggests a serious combustion problem. The two biggest influences here are compression ratio and exhaust dilution from reversion.

I knew as soon as I drove the car that something was seriously amiss.

I first thought that perpaps my cams had been incorrectly installed, but I just have so much trouble believing that the HKS step one cams are causing so many problems - surely this would have come to light before.

Richards first thought was that something had been installed incorrectly, but he checked everything and its ok - I really wish it wasnt:)

Another anomoly, the idle is almost perfect (apart from intermittent hunting) there is absolutely no lumpy idle sound?

Its pretty frustrating, but if you can give me a heads up on how to use the degree wheel and dial indicator, I will give it a go.

Cheers

Steve

How do you dial a cam in? Is there a level of adjustment between the cam and the lug that the cam wheel sits on? Where exactly does the dial sit and how does it measure what angle the cam is at?

These are things I've wondered for a long time but before now couldn't be bothered learning. Installing your own cam wheels piques your curiosity :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...