Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Steve.

So whats the peak power you now have.

Ben, Try it with the smaller exhaust a/r first. The tests tim has done has shown that it makes bugger all difference with the larger a/r unless you are up over 650-700hp. Depends if you want more power in the last 1000rpm of your rev range or would prefer more power in the 3000rpm prior to that last 1000rpm. Bolt it in and see how it goes.

Well I am not going for insane power at high RPM.. 400rwhp with great torque even would be great for a start. It is a street car.

Im not to sure on what affects it? .69 AR with a 50mm exaust wheel? How does A/R compare to wheel size?

As for my manifold, the Subzero one I have actually a split design also... goes from 2 lots of 3 into 2 and straight to the turbo.

Is it vital to have a matching turbo with split entry design? or am I now forced to get the proper turbo or another manifold..

Damn more things just keep proping up...

I took some more photos to compare etc. I tried to take some of the exhaust fins on the dual entry T88 but I couldn't get it to show up. The fin design is rather different to that of a single entry turbo. I would imagine mixing the two would cause problems..

Subzero Manifold.

2.jpg

Subzero1.jpg

Subzero2.jpg

Trust T88 Turbo.

Turbo.jpg

Turbo2.jpg

Single inlet T04.

T04.jpg

Sorry if the links disappear.. free host.

It depends on the turbo, not all trust and HKS turbos are built like that (called split pulse), but of course some are. Usually seems to be the big hp turbo setups, which would alos explain the longer pipe design as they are built to perform at the top end.

Ben, just noticed another interesting thing, the sub zero manifold has grouped sequentially firing cylinders to each side of the split - I am thinking along the lines of what happens in my manifold, ie the pulses will collide with eachother and possibly cause back pressure? Or am I mixing up the firing order/grouping of the runners?

The nissans fire 1,4,2,5,3,6 dont they? Looks like the Jap manifold seperates the grouping.

The firing order for the RB is 153624. Thanks for pointing that out, I never considered it.

So looking at the manifold, it will fire. Right, Left, Right, Right, Left, Left.

The HKS manifold seems to just bank 3 from each side.

Getting really confused with all this.. I guess all I can do it try things and see what happens.

Quite interesting though. :rofl:

Dont want to sound as though im assasinating parts on your car, but the welding on that manifold isnt the best...it has a fair bit of undercut/or excess penetration. You can see the variance on overall diameter at the weld.

Subzero2.jpg

Depending on the wall thickness and the unsuported weight of the turbo on the manifold, then you may find that this manifold may be a lttle more susceptible to cracking.

.69 AR with a 50mm exaust wheel? How does A/R compare to wheel size?

A/R, area/radius. So its a ratio of the area of the hole through the housing, and the distance from the area's centre to the centre of the turbine wheel.

As its only a ratio, it doesnt mean a 0.69 Housing from a GT25 is the same size as a 0.69 housing off a GT30, as obviously the turbine wheel on the GT30 is goin got be larger in daimeter.

Meaning that the radius (length from centre of area to centre of turbine) is going to be larger for a GT30 to accomodate the larger wheel. In turn as the radius is going to be larger the Area will have to be larger to maintain the ratio of 0.69...making sense?

Thanks for that ROY.

I know the welding on the manifold isn't the best.. I just had a GTR head and that manifold was attached.. so it's better than having nothing right? :rofl:

It had a very heavy turbo attached... and didn't seem to hurt the manifold too much.

The HKS one above had a couple of small cracks with the T88 attached.

Is there anything I can do to the SubZero manifold to improve the welds??

So a T04 with a 50mm exaust wheel and an A/R of .69 is rather small?..

Steve, Sorry to here about your dramas:( I have a custom manifold with a GT30 (0.64housing) and it's making over 300rwkw. Mine is still stock cams, stock headgasket. I'm personally not entirely convinced that it is the manifolds fault, as my mate has the larger housing on his and it's not nearly as laggy as yours.

Hi Steve, can I just make sure I have the facts right...

Previously, 0.61 A/R, 9.0 to compression, standard cams, standard cam timing, boost at 3,000 rpm, max power 256 rwkw at 1 bar.

Now, 0.87 A/R, 8.6 to compression, 256/8.8 inlet & 264/9.0 exhaust cams, exhaust cam timing 6 degrees retarded, boost at 3,700 rpm, max power ? rwkw at ? bar.

There are a couple of bits of missing information (or maybe I simply missed them), plus you don't mention ignition timing. The lower compression ratio should have allowed more advance. How much? On the other hand it will have cost you around 250 rpm in boost build, of the 700 rpm you have "lost".

My humble opinion, I don't think it has anything to do with the length of the primary pipes. I have previously done back to back with a standard RB20 manifold and a GTSR tuned length (low, rear mount) manifold. It made more power everywhere and I don't think you could get longer primary pipes than a GTSR set.

Maybe fill in the missing bits of data if you can, but my guess right now would be something else is wrong. Unless the manifold has very severe interference problems. But that seems unlikely given the previous results.

What I would do;

1. do a leak down test

2. check the ignition timing with a timing light every 1,000 rpm from 2,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm.

3. Measure the primary pipe length and ID and feed it into any of the online exhaust design software. That will tell you the tuned rpm for your size of engine. It should also tell you the severe reversion rpm's (there should be 3).

4. If none of the above sheds any light, then I would stick the standard cams back in at standard timing.

5. Then work your way through the stages.

Hope that helps.

Ben, by comparison the HKS GT3037 has a 84mm exhaust wheel. I suppose you could say ARs are not ARs:)

Correct me if I am wrong, transposition of formula:

A/R = .69 therefore, A= R x .69

By increasing the Radius, the Area will therefore increase too, to use arbitary figures:

if R = 30mm, x .69 = an Area of 20.7

if R = 45mm, x .69 = an Area of 31.05

Add to these figures that you have a bigger exhaust wheel, and quite possibly a bigger exhaust opening, and you can see that a small turbo with an AR of 0.8 could be alot smaller than a bigger turbo with an AR of 0.6

So it is probably a bit inaccurate saying a certain size AR is suitable for a specific hp IMHO.

Ben, by comparison the HKS GT3037 has a 84mm exhaust wheel.  I suppose you could say ARs are not ARs:)

Correct me if I am wrong, transposition of formula:

A/R = .69 therefore, A= R x .69

By increasing the Radius, the Area will therefore increase too, to use arbitary figures:

if R = 30mm, x .69 = an Area of 20.7

if R = 45mm, x .69 = an Area of 31.05

Add to these figures that you have a bigger exhaust wheel, and quite possibly a bigger exhaust opening, and you can see that a small turbo with an AR of 0.8 could be alot smaller than a bigger turbo with an AR of 0.6

So it is probably a bit inaccurate saying a certain size AR is suitable for a specific hp IMHO.

The HKS 3037S or 3037 has a 60mm large and 55mm exducer diameter, exactly the same as the GT30 series Garrett, again, it's all on http://www.hksusa.com/categories/more.asp?id=1092

The 84 refers to trim (which is small diameter squared divided by large diameter squared x 100). Plenty of Garrett sites to confirm numbers.

But anyway, it's all gotta add up to less turbo response at low RPM...lower comp ratio, larger duration cams (particularly exhaust), larger A/R exhaust housing. As we know things get magnified on turbo engines and are cumulative. Really the only thing that may have helped broaden the power range is the increased cam lift.

GTS-T VSPEC, What boost are you running to achieve that power? I assume you are runing stock pistons as well. I have GT30/40 with stock exhaust manifold, internal wastegate, stock head and pistons. I have 253rwkW at 17psi with 15° timing and 11.8 a/f ratio and want to start pushing it harder and need to go the next step.

Steve, great thread, good on ya for opening up discussion.

paul, I know that something is wrong, I am not saying the longer runners are the entire fault, and I agree that boost should be alot earlier than where it is, even with a manifold with longer runners (although they will make a difference to how boost is made). I am thinking that there must be some sort of crazy interferance happening where the runners join - what else could it be? If you know something I dont, please do tell.

freebaggin, oops, my bad, it was late and I was tired when I posted that one, sorry for the misleading info.

Sydneykid, 1 bar of boost now happens at around 5000rpm, so lag has increased by 2000rpm. Positive boost doesnt start building until just before 4000rpm.

Richard who tuned the car, and has done a couple in this trim, said he couldnt understand why it was taking so much ign timing, didnt say exactly how much, but did say 20odd degrees more than he would expect. He did a great job of improving off boost driveability and getting the lag down - before he started it was around 800-1000rpm more lag.

I dont know what rwkw, it hasnt been on a dyno, only street tuned.

Before I go replacing the cams, I will change the turbine housing, Richard said he wants to have a good look at the manifold - which is understandable, next will be the inlet cam, then the exhaust cam. Only thing delaying me is that I paid over $1700 more than I was quoted to get the cams etc changed, and with christmas around the corner, well it may be a back seat for a while.

If it isnt the manifold, what the hell could it be? Cams are a good thing, turbo is a good thing, head gasket has the CR above a GTR CR, so it wont be hurting things too much. The 0.87 is the recommended AR for that turbo for the street (by HKS) and shouldnt useable boost in after 4000rpm, which is where I need to get it back to.

Steve, one thing you can do yourself for minimal cost is go out and get yourself a degree wheel and a cheapie dial indicator.

Without actually changing anything, find out exactly where the inlet and exhaust valve opening and closing points are.

I still think the engine is not producing enough exhaust flow. Excessive advance requirement strongly suggests a serious combustion problem. The two biggest influences here are compression ratio and exhaust dilution from reversion.

I knew as soon as I drove the car that something was seriously amiss.

I first thought that perpaps my cams had been incorrectly installed, but I just have so much trouble believing that the HKS step one cams are causing so many problems - surely this would have come to light before.

Richards first thought was that something had been installed incorrectly, but he checked everything and its ok - I really wish it wasnt:)

Another anomoly, the idle is almost perfect (apart from intermittent hunting) there is absolutely no lumpy idle sound?

Its pretty frustrating, but if you can give me a heads up on how to use the degree wheel and dial indicator, I will give it a go.

Cheers

Steve

How do you dial a cam in? Is there a level of adjustment between the cam and the lug that the cam wheel sits on? Where exactly does the dial sit and how does it measure what angle the cam is at?

These are things I've wondered for a long time but before now couldn't be bothered learning. Installing your own cam wheels piques your curiosity :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • And if it still spikes, just for now, turn off VCT completely by disabling it OR simply unplug the solenoid. Just to rule out excessive exhaust pressure. I recall a video from Motive DVD about a decade ago, where Hawkins original single Garrett GTX3582 or so turbo had boost control issues sub 1.4bar of boost as well.   Food for thought? Is there anyway you can peg the WG completely open and/or dodgily not plumb it back into your exhaust system for testing purposes?
    • I will endeavour to give it a crack sooner or later. I have the wastegate apart at the moment so I'll replace it with a smaller spring just to see what it does and if I have to go back then so be it.   If it spikes to 23 but can then be controlled back to 20, then the gate must not be 100% open... So if it's not 100% open then why can't it drop the boost even further than 20psi (I understand it's not linear). What a headache this whole thing is.
    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
×
×
  • Create New...