Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all

Trying toi make a decision on turbs for my RB20, that will be getting dropped into my Drift project next weekend.

I have here, in my hands, a TD06 17c, with dump

or, i can get a VG30....

done a bit of research, and others have for me, and the 06 seems to be decent for the 20,

some people say better than the VG....

anyone with 06-17c on there 20 wanna shed some light?

what rpm does it see +boost? what rpm full boost? etc etc....

cheers!

craig.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/295323-td06-17c-v-vg30-on-rb20/
Share on other sites

How those graphs going trent?

You wouldn;t have any graphs of a TD06SL2 20G on a 25 would you? 10cm preferably.

they dont make a 10cm version, get a T67 or td06sh-20g.

Here are the Td06-17c (external gate) results on one of our built tractor engines @ 20psi :P The 17c's are pretty old this one is getting replaced by an L2 (more mid and top end)

post-34927-1257764120_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1257764181_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS

Few quick questions about the the TD series then. (i'm going to start a tread dedicated to Mitsubishi, Greddy, Trust turbo results because i've been looking for results for ages and have found very few and if i do find any they are missing bits like what size rear housing they are using).

A T67 is basically a TD06SL2-25G isn't it, in that the turbine side is the same it just they have a the bigger 78mm compressor instead of the 20G's 68mm compressor. Therefore the turbine housings should be interchangeable, so if there is a 10cm T67 turbine housing it should fit the 20G.

Have you had anyone running a Kando Dynamic turbo yet, there are a few threads on EVO forums and they seem to be a good bit of gear and they have both 8 and 10 housings for the L2. They are copy turbos but seem to be good quality.

Edited by D_Stirls
Have you had anyone running a Kando Dynamic turbo yet, there are a few threads on EVO forums and they seem to be a good bit of gear and they have both 8 and 10 housings for the L2. They are copy turbos but seem to be good quality.

tried a few on sr's and they dont match up unfortunately, i have been using some of those turbos (direct from manufacturer) years before Kando imported them and rebadged them.

I will chase up some comparo graphs for the Kando stuff

This is one of Sam's graphs from that 4 door 32 he did the 25 conversion on.

What i was hoping the 10cm would achieve is reducing the choking of the rear in the top end and the drop in boost that it induces with the 8cm.

post-27020-1257766642_thumb.jpg

What is the name of the factory? Kinugawa Turbo Japan?

This is what i was look at for my 25 conversion (into a 180sx),

This turbo;

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...e=STRK:MEWAX:IT

With this turbine housing;

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...e=STRK:MEWAX:IT

Edited by D_Stirls
This is one of Sam's graphs from that 4 door 32 he did the 25 conversion on.

What i was hoping the 10cm would achieve is reducing the choking of the rear in the top end and the drop in boost that it induces with the 8cm.

post-27020-1257766642_thumb.jpg

What is the name of the factory? Kinugawa Turbo Japan?

another rebrand., turbos come from taiwan.

see how much boost was run on that copy l2 graph? 24+ psi, a real l2 on a sr20 @ 22psi makes over 300rwkw (400rwhp). A td06sh25g 10cm on a rb25 @ 22psi makes 340rwkw ish.

The copies are really inefficient, 25psi to make 225rwkw (300rwhp) is nothing flash (sam is a great tuner, turbo is not so great) and is typical of the results we have found.

Edited by URAS
turbos come from taiwan.

yeah i have heard that (I'm pretty sure these do too), i think they are claiming they are made in Japan to try and better their reputation, but their products seem to be speaking for themselves.

When are you seeing full boost (22psi) with a 25G 10cm though, you'd be looking at 4200rpm+ wouldn't you?

This is why i want to start that thread, hopefully Buster and the others can post up their graphs and the spec's of the turbos so they can all be in one place.

Edited by D_Stirls
yeah i have heard that (I'm pretty sure these do too), i think they are claiming they are made in Japan to try and better their reputation, but their products seem to be speaking for themselves.

When are you seeing full boost (22psi) with a 25G 10cm though, you'd be looking at 4200rpm+ wouldn't you?

This is why i want to start that thread, hopefully Buster and the others can post up their graphs and the spec's of the turbos so they can all be in one place.

trust me they all come from the same factory, even KAZAMA (JAPAN) sell a rebranded turbo from the same taiwanese factory.

http://www.greenline.jp/catalogue/bbcatpar...rbocharger+Kits

Edited by URAS
  • 6 months later...

Sorry for late reply only just saw this...

I was not, and have never used a Kinugawa / Kando turbo, I have my own source outside japan for what seems to be an EXACT copy of the L2's using equal (or better) quality materials.

The reason I used so much boost was due to cam timing to maximise response.

The L2 from my 4dr was sold when the car was sold, and is still spinning quite hard.

Sam.

Few quick questions about the the TD series then. (i'm going to start a tread dedicated to Mitsubishi, Greddy, Trust turbo results because i've been looking for results for ages and have found very few and if i do find any they are missing bits like what size rear housing they are using).

A T67 is basically a TD06SL2-25G isn't it, in that the turbine side is the same it just they have a the bigger 78mm compressor instead of the 20G's 68mm compressor. Therefore the turbine housings should be interchangeable, so if there is a 10cm T67 turbine housing it should fit the 20G.

Have you had anyone running a Kando Dynamic turbo yet, there are a few threads on EVO forums and they seem to be a good bit of gear and they have both 8 and 10 housings for the L2. They are copy turbos but seem to be good quality.

T67 is the 20G with bigger compressor.

You could put a 10cm exhaust housing on the rear of the L2 or the T67.

And from what you have mentioned I do not think that the compressor housings are interchangeable between the L2 and the T67.

Keeping in mind that the 25G and the L2 are not the same turbo. :)

Sorry for late reply only just saw this...

I was not, and have never used a Kinugawa / Kando turbo, I have my own source outside japan for what seems to be an EXACT copy of the L2's using equal (or better) quality materials.

The reason I used so much boost was due to cam timing to maximise response.

The L2 from my 4dr was sold when the car was sold, and is still spinning quite hard.

Sam.

Im pretty sure we buy from the same place then :)

Used a few of their T67's and L2's and they mirror the genuine trust gear to the letter. Have made in japn on both turbo and box but i know for a fact they are from ROC as ive seen the factory. Its the same factory Kazama and others in japan are sourcing from.

No issues on reliability here yet either.

Trent - I'm pretty sure that mine are from a different place as they don't sell the T67 :) mind pm'ing me their details :cool:

Also, you mentioned the inferior performance above, was that relating to the Kando ones? Do the ones you get have the same characteristics of slightly inferior performance? I have a Genuine L2 and one of my copy ones here, and will be doing back to back in the next few weeks as you now have me curious. Pulled apart side by side I can't spot the difference even up close.

Zebra - Pm'd

i had a uber oldschool td06-19c 14cm kit on my dr30 (fj20et) evan had a sigma wastgate (prior to hks) it was ok very good punch in the face boost delivery. not much power but. it was a stock ecu.

ive got a 10 or 12cm tdo6 housing somewhere rusting away in my garage

T67 is the 20G with bigger compressor.

You could put a 10cm exhaust housing on the rear of the L2 or the T67.

And from what you have mentioned I do not think that the compressor housings are interchangeable between the L2 and the T67.

Keeping in mind that the 25G and the L2 are not the same turbo. :banana:

My understanding of the nomenclature of the Mitsubishi/Greddy/Trust is that the TD06 part of the name dictates the size of the turbine which has different trims which is dictated by the S SH H etc. The 20G side of the name dictates the compressor size. So the G determines the compressor exducer and the 20 dictates the trim of the compressor. This is clouded by the fact that there is a 16G that has a 60mm exducer and the 25G has 78mm exducer.

Is seems that if the compressor is upsized above the regular compressor size for the turboine then the nomenclature changes to the T67, T78 series names.

So the correct compressor for a TD06 is the 20G wheel, the TD07 is the 25G wheel, and when you mix and match the naming changes to T67, T78 names are used.

The L2 wheel is a variation on the TD06S wheel which has 0 less blade and is cropped.

Now this is just what i have figured by looking at the spec's and is probably completely incorrect, if it is please let me know how the nomenclature works.

Spec's Sheet;

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/post-a251041-

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...