Jump to content
SAU Community

Odo Doesnt Accumuate Kms Accurately

Hargow

By Hargow,
in General Maintenance

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hargow Experienced

Hargow

Posted
Posted

Hi guys

Not sure if i posted in correct section, but my ODO seems to be reading incorrectly for the traveled KM's

I've tested it this week and so far half tank has gotten me 78KMs?

I don't think its my fuel efficiency as my car hardly has anything that would use that much petrol when driving normally

I was expecting at least 150 - 200 on half tank reading but its sitting on 82KM traveled at the moment

Any help would be appreciated

Cheers,

Will

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296632-odo-doesnt-accumuate-kms-accurately/
Share on other sites
blind_elk Grand Master

blind_elk

Posted
Posted

Odometer measures distances, not fuel economy.

Poor fuel economy is often the result of a failed engine temp sensor (ECU thinks the engine is still cold, and overfuels the mixtures).

Other possibility is a dirty air filter restricting airflow into the engine.

Hargow Experienced

Hargow

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Odometer measures distances, not fuel economy.

Poor fuel economy is often the result of a failed engine temp sensor (ECU thinks the engine is still cold, and overfuels the mixtures).

Other possibility is a dirty air filter restricting airflow into the engine.

Yes i know it measures the distance but is it possible for it to read inaccurately?

I will be getting my car checked out this week, will be running it on my mates dyno to see if the ODO matches up with the dyno distance traveled

I'll get the engine temp sensor checked as well, other then that any other possibilities?

blind_elk Grand Master

blind_elk

Posted
Posted
Yes i know it measures the distance but is it possible for it to read inaccurately?

I will be getting my car checked out this week, will be running it on my mates dyno to see if the ODO matches up with the dyno distance traveled

I'll get the engine temp sensor checked as well, other then that any other possibilities?

What I'm saying is that just because you have used more fuel than you expected to use doesn't mean the odometer is inaccurate. Presumably it has been accurate until now, so there is no reason why it would suddenly become inaccurate.

And it's "other THAN that".

Hargow Experienced

Hargow

Posted
  • Author
Posted
What I'm saying is that just because you have used more fuel than you expected to use doesn't mean the odometer is inaccurate. Presumably it has been accurate until now, so there is no reason why it would suddenly become inaccurate.

And it's "other THAN that".

Fair enough, I'll see how it goes this Saturday

Hopefully its something as simple as the O2 sensor or Engine temp sensor

GTR-N1 Grand Master

GTR-N1

Posted
Posted
... but my ODO seems to be reading incorrectly for the traveled KM's

I've tested it this week and so far half tank has gotten me 78KMs?

I don't think its my fuel efficiency as my car hardly has anything that would use that much petrol when driving normally

I was expecting at least 150 - 200 on half tank reading but its sitting on 82KM traveled at the moment

Cheers,

Will

What blind_elk is saying is that there has to be something else other than just the odometer that's at fault.

If you're using up half a tank to get as far as 78Kms, something abominable is going on (according to your fuel gauge + tripmeter + calculations of where you've travelled).

2 faults = 2 different sets of symptoms in this case

Hargow Experienced

Hargow

Posted
  • Author
Posted
What blind_elk is saying is that there has to be something else other than just the odometer that's at fault.

If you're using up half a tank to get as far as 78Kms, something abominable is going on (according to your fuel gauge + tripmeter + calculations of where you've travelled).

2 faults = 2 different sets of symptoms in this case

Yeah at the moment I'm still trying to see what else is going on, taking into account everyone's suggestions as well

I wont know until i have it checked out this Saturday, i just thought it was strange as my driving style hasn't changed and i feel i have traveled more then 80KM this week (Liverpool to Wollongong on Saturday which should have yielded at least 80kms on top of whatever i already had).

But yeah look will keep you guys posted on this.

Thanks for your help

  • 2 weeks later...
Hargow Experienced

Hargow

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Update!

Got it checked out and it was the ODO reading incorrectly (half of what its meant to read)

I just got the SINE WAVE box re calibrated so all is reading correctly.

Thanks for your help guys

MYSKY1 Enthusiast

MYSKY1

Posted
Posted
Update!

Got it checked out and it was the ODO reading incorrectly (half of what its meant to read)

I just got the SINE WAVE box re calibrated so all is reading correctly.

Thanks for your help guys

Good stuff Grimmjow. Bet you feel vindicated that it WAS the ODO :-)

Curtis.Cow Community Regular

Curtis.Cow

Posted
Posted

haha im having the same problem with my stock one, and the speedo is half of what it should be :\ maybe i need to get it calibrated? Dunno getting a new cluster and gear sensor this weekend

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • sinn3r
      R34 Skyline climate control unit transistor

      By sinn3r · Posted

      Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • GTSBoy
      Best place to order Authetic R32 Parts in Japan

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • GTSBoy
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • GTSBoy
      Blue slip

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...