Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys, ive done an rb25det and box conversion to my s13.

my speedo is reading about half of my actual speed, at first i thought this was a problem with the s13 speedo compatibility, but since the PFC is reading the same (r33 pfc).

does that mean I have the wrong speed sender in the gearbox? as it was bought separately.

thanks

Edited by midnight

Wrong speedo sensor for the gearbox. Half your speed is pretty ridiculous...that doesn't sound like something that different diff ratios and tyre size would be responsible for. Sounds to me like the speedo is completely wrong...is it an electronic sensor or mechanical? The former would explain why it would fit in the gearbox but still be incorrect...

Yep, well electronic...it basically runs as an electromagnet...and if the metal cogs that go past the sensor are spaced more apart than was originally intended for that sensor, it will naturally give you a slower reading.

You can get them recalibrated...but better off finding a genuine sensor. Remember that it will probably still read a little off because your diff and tyre size will be different to the R33 the gearbox came out of.

are you sure it's electric sender? I thought the speedo drive in the S13 cluster is mechanical... 32s certainly are mechanical driven with a speedo drive and cable to the back of the cluster, that then sends the electronic speed signal to the ecu.

I have a similar problem. i have a CA18 auto S13 that has been converted to SR20DET, manual with S14 box and the speedo is out. it's not half road speed. more like 10km/h out. purely because the sender in the box is not the one that's intended for my diff ratio.

100% its electric, this is my 3rd motor in this car, ive had to wire it a few times before.

BeerBaron aparantly, nissan made different colour cogs with different numbers of teeth on them for different diff ratios. from like 16 teeth up to 21?

i was skimming through an article today about it.

so you could probably figure out the sender you based on how far out the speedo is, and the current cog. might be hard to find one tho.

also you could use the jaycar speedo adjuster, its about $50 wires in right after the sender.

Edited by midnight

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...