Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So use r33 sensors?

But then these have to be bent to clear some other pipework or cabling don't they?

Maybe I should just go the Tomei's. I already have a good aftermarket front pipe but I don't the its as wide as the tomei outlet.

Go tomei, the trust ones are a pita, i swapped mine out about a year or so ago..

my new front pipe wasnt quiet as big as the tomei outlet either but a die grinder made it a little better for flow.

Make sure you got the gtr one and not the vspec ones. They should all fit perfectly (maybe o2 will need some work) across all 3 models but the 34vspec has extra o2. No biggy, just need to find a bolt or bung to seal it up.

Why bother with the O2 sensor?

The RB26 is not a fuel efficient engine and having the O2 won't help much.

I changed my Mines dump and front pipe, which is similar to the Tomei dump, to the Greddy and gained a few hundreds rpm of boost response.

BTW does your Greddy front pipe have a flex pipe? If it doesn't, it would be best to get one installed.

ORIGINAL Trust pipes come with adaptors, so it doesnt matter what O2.

be careful of copies though. There are a solid number of cheap knockoff's floating around for a while whose flanges etc were all uneven, different sizes etc.

Thanks everyone, I have spotted a genuine set. Just know there are mixed opinions about these pipes.

The only reason I am considering is because the price is not much more than tomei dumps.

they are the best flowing kit on the market.

I actually think there was a set going cheap at autobarn narre warren when i was down there last, nearly bought it as a spare.

Edited by URAS

Just be mindful about the O2 sensor types, R32 GTRs use a Titania based sensor, while 33's and 34s use a Zirconia based sensor, you can't use a Zirconia based sensor on the R32 GTR ecu (well you can, but it won't work as well).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...