Jump to content
SAU Community

Speed Camera's


Hanaldo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Not sure if this topic has been raised before, searching for 'speed cameras' brings up a lot of threads.

Today when me and my mate were driving out towards El Cabello's resort near Wundowie on the GEH, we came across a pretty serious car crash. Traffic was stopped completely, so i asked a police officer that was directing traffic what had happened. Apparently a flat-tray truck carrying a caravan had been speeding and slammed the brakes on when he saw a speed camera and he fishtailed off the road and into the bush. Those are 100km/h roads out there, and he was speeding so im sure you can imagine the scene. Just to paint a picture though, the truck had gone about 15 metre's off the road and up a 2m high, verticle embankment. The whole cab was completely crushed and the block had been pushed up into the cab. Very serious accident, but i didn't want to ask on the condition of the driver so im not sure.

My point is, do you think speed camera's promote safety or cause accidents? Personally i do not know how much they do to prevent people speeding, as obviously there are still lots of people speeding everywhere. Plus when people drive past a camera, they instantly assume that there won't be any more camera's and it is now safe to speed. And as the accident i mentioned shows, lots of people panic when they see a speed camera and slam on the brakes, sometimes even if they aren't speeding. In a car (or truck) that doesn't have great braking ability, slamming on the brakes is never a good idea.

So do what role do you think speed camera's play in road safety?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I believe that they are mainly a revenue raising device more than a preventative or pro-active approach to Road Safety,

One only has to look at the amount of revenue taken from the cameras that is returned to the Road Safety scheme.....

It is ultimately a coffer filling fall-back that can be disguised as Road Safety.

If we better equip our drivers (Tougher Examinations and Courses) being mandatory like Scandinavian countries,

and filter some money into the roads and the services to maintaining the infastructure I think we would see a marked reduction compared to just relying on Speed Cameras.

Just my 2 Cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speed cameras are good but putting them on a long stretch of road or roads were the speed limit is 2 slow eg alexander dr is purely 4 revenue raising because there will most likely never be a crash there no matter the speed.

but u do get some ppl eg my mum who will slam on the brakes when they see a speed camera even if they were doing the speed limit. i think if they gave u 5km/h leeway ppl would not panic so bad when they see a speed camera

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all,

Not sure if this topic has been raised before, searching for 'speed cameras' brings up a lot of threads.

Today when me and my mate were driving out towards El Cabello's resort near Wundowie on the GEH, we came across a pretty serious car crash. Traffic was stopped completely, so i asked a police officer that was directing traffic what had happened. Apparently a flat-tray truck carrying a caravan had been speeding and slammed the brakes on when he saw a speed camera and he fishtailed off the road and into the bush. Those are 100km/h roads out there, and he was speeding so im sure you can imagine the scene. Just to paint a picture though, the truck had gone about 15 metre's off the road and up a 2m high, verticle embankment. The whole cab was completely crushed and the block had been pushed up into the cab. Very serious accident, but i didn't want to ask on the condition of the driver so im not sure.

My point is, do you think speed camera's promote safety or cause accidents? Personally i do not know how much they do to prevent people speeding, as obviously there are still lots of people speeding everywhere. Plus when people drive past a camera, they instantly assume that there won't be any more camera's and it is now safe to speed. And as the accident i mentioned shows, lots of people panic when they see a speed camera and slam on the brakes, sometimes even if they aren't speeding. In a car (or truck) that doesn't have great braking ability, slamming on the brakes is never a good idea.

So do what role do you think speed camera's play in road safety?

They're essential for the raising of lots of revenue not to be used on road improvements as a recent study in the US found that bad roads are actualy the main cause by far of automobile accidents and we wouldn't want that to change that now would we ?

:down:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were all about safety then they would have fixed speed camera in a spot nortorious for accidents and speeding.

Before the camera they would have a sign advising people of the camera ahead.

People would see the sign, know they should slow down, then they'd drive carefully past the troublesome area = no accidents.

Same goes for school zone. Put in fixed cameras in every zone with signs before the camera and people will slow down.

Unfortunately this would not be a wise exercise in revenue raising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally have never liked how sneaky WA are with there speed cameras.

How many times have I seen people lock up there brakes on the freeway trying not to get flashed and almost cause a huge pile up. Then you see the sneaky *beep* behind a tree then the sign "Cameras any ware anytime". Cameras are incorrectly set up in WA for the intension not to slow you down or make the road "safer" but to give out as many fines as they can.

In London where I have lived for 20 years they have fixed cameras and they are clearly displayed in yellow every few ks down the freeway.

This takes away the element of surprise on the drivers who wishes to speed. You wouldn't even speed if you knew a camera was coming up anyway so makes it even more effective and brings in the purpose of "safety".

Example: If some idiot is speeding past you on the freeway in the right lane and.... Surprise! A camera pops up then he locks up his brakes trying not to get flashed and he takes you out with him... Who is to blame? I would say both Mr. Speed Camera and of course the idiot speeding. If the tool speeding knew a speed camera was going to pop up he would of slowed down 100% causing less problems for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) The real anawer to all the speed camera bullshit is radar detectors, it beeps--motorist slows down , right safety result or cop the ticket and don't whinge , right revenue raising result---ah-- but wait , radar detectors--illegal--big fine--not nice.

Face it you're going to get it straight up the ass if you speed no matter how stupid or unposted the speed limit may be.

I've only had one speeding ticket in my life (I'm friken 60 and beyond grumpy) and I've driven at suicidal speeds when I was younger--my one speeding ticket--doing 70 in a 60 zone about 9 months ago in a friken French junk heap Citroen C2.

The reason--well the QLD has found a new way of pinging drivers--- 70 speed limit--- approach roundabout 60 speed limit---exit roandabout 60 speed limit---same road 70 speed limit---frakin nah still 60 , bada boom- pinged by an unmarked 50 mtres down the road.

That and just don't periodicaly post speed limits at the roadside , but change the limit for no apparent reason on the same stretch of road.--nice eh ?

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

radar detectors are still legal in WA.

:) Well WTF wouldn't you have one if you live in WA and you've got a happy right foot ?

I've been considering hooking one even though they're illegal as some are being advertised as "undetectable" only a lack of actual proof of this undetectability have stopped me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) Well WTF wouldn't you have one if you live in WA and you've got a happy right foot ?

I've been considering hooking one even though they're illegal as some are being advertised as "undetectable" only a lack of actual proof of this undetectability have stopped me.

you're a radar detector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

off topic but do radar detecters work 4 the new speed cameras there bringing out ??

If agregate speed is what your refering to---nah-- , you'll be pinged a number of times over a set distance and even if you aren't speeding at any particular one but your average speed exceeds the posted limit--you're nicked--.

Edited by BASHO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You've done it wrong. I don't have time right now to type up enough. I'll have to come back to it or maybe someone else will in the meantime. The boost signal has to pass through the MAC valve from boost source (turbo outlet - effectively anywhere between the turbo outlet and the throttle body will do, but closer to the turbo outlet is best) to the wastegate. What you have done is connected it sort of like the stock solenoid. But it doesn't work the same way as the stock solenoid. That Tee piece that you have connected the solenoid to....? The solenoid itself serves that function. You should look up a typical MAC valve connection diagram for a single turbo internal wastegate application. You'll find one easily enough. Every single boost controller manufacturer that uses MAC valves will have one. Bugger it, I'll just grab the HP Academy one. The other thing you have to get right is that the boost source has to be connected to the correct port on the solenoid valve. This is because the solenoid makes the valve switch from connecting 2 of the ports when it is unpowered, to connecting one of those first 2 ports to the third port when it is powered. One inlet, two outlets. You will note from the diagram that the common port is port 3, the port to the wastegate is port 2, and port 1 is the vent (where the boost signal escapes when the solenoid pulses ON). As to the BOV.... the vacuum signal for the BOV simply has to come from the plenum. It must register boost when you're on boost and vacuum when the throttle is closed. That's all. The original location on the plenum is best. Best practice is never to interfere with the vacuum line running to the FPR. Just leave that one alone, as you will avoid causing unintended problems that might occur if you mess something up.
    • I was able to complete installation of the G4X ecu. I needed to reroute MAP vacuum signal from stock location to where BOV is connected on the intake plenum. Has anyone needed to do the same? When I connect vac port by the BOV flange to my HKS BOV, it doesnt work and I get flutter. I would to get BOV working, where would it be best to T in? Or would it best for me to move MAP vac line and T into FPR? Secondly, I installed a MAC 3 port boost solenoid and wanted to know if i routed it correctly. I place two lines from stock boost solenoid and placed it on ports 1 and 2, leaving 3 vented. The T for wastegate and boost source on compressor elbow is on port 2, and port 1 is connected to turbo inlet intake pipe. Please see attached pictures. Ill upload ecu config later today. Thanks in advance.
    • some people are still around weirdly enough - most people just use facebook now to ask the same 12 questions tho XD  
    • Omg Rezz! Yep we're still here and actually seeing a trickle of oldies coming back.  How's things? 
    • So I raised the car up a fair bit for shipping - see image - then lowered it again when it arrived. I then rushed to get an alignment in NL before the track and the shop just wasn’t anywhere near as precise as what I got in Japan. The guys that did the alignment this week said there was a fair amount of toe in the rear that could have contributed to the understeer. It was also the case that the rear camber went from about -2 to -3 at the shop in NL. However, since I’ve now got slightly wider tires in the rear - NS2Rs run wider than Accelera 651S - I could only get a minimum of -3 in the rear now due to clearance. Front is now -2.75 (-2.45 in minutes) due to being raised a bit (previously -3 in JP). So it’s likely a combination of the two factors, camber and toe. The issue now is I have more camber in the rear than the front and the next step on the front Cusco arms will put me at -3.5ish front which seems a bit excessive to me. The weird thing is I’ve never had any understeer at the track in Japan but they are very different circuits - Japanese circuits are much slower than the one I’ve been to here.    I’m probably going to have to start another thread for the E90. The plan is sort of to keep it as a daily but progressively mod it into a track car - honestly, you need a cage for the sort of speeds you go here. Just ordered the M3 front arms btw.  Love the car despite it being in pretty shitty condition. Oil analysis came back okay and it seems to have stopped consuming oil since fixing a load of engine bay things. Saw yours is a 335i right? f**king mistake on my part getting the DI N53 over the N52, fuel economy is insanely good though at 14-16 km/L.   Cheers, it’s great to see the benefits and pitfalls of different places. I’m contemplating going back to the U.K. around next year as the cost of living in the Netherlands is just ridiculous. GF is nagging me to settle and buy a house but I don’t know what LSD to buy. 
×
×
  • Create New...