Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

High compression pistons, larger bore, balanced bottom end, stiff valve springs, aftermarket ecu, higher rev limit (assuming it is still making power)

with an na, you have engine capacity, head + ancilliaries flow, and rpm as your basics.

So if you had a 3.1/3.2L spinning to 7000rpm......

(going to a larger bore may not be a good idea, i dont know, im not an rb30e na tuning and motor building expert. its a good idea but i dont know if it will hinder the engines ability to rev or something)

my rb30e is getting a bit sick....

how much did each of your mods cost, who did it, what exactly is the mod, where is peak power, whats the powerband like etc???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-615498
Share on other sites

how much did each of your mods cost, who did it, what exactly is the mod, where is peak power, whats the powerband like etc???

the cam is a SURECAM (btw surecam make all the cams for chiptorque, and for the rb30 hp1,hp2,hp3 it's the same cam)

headwork was also done by surecam. double springs, lifter boxes machined, port-n-polish.

104rwkw's on the chiptorque dyno, power comes on strong 2500-7000

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-615645
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
without n2o or turbo!

Turbo is probably the best bang for buck though! can probably pick up the bits you need for under $1k, and run low boost (6psi or so) on standard n/a block without too many dramas.

or the twin cam head conversion also (may as well get a turbo head put on if you're doing that).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-638082
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
let us know how you ran at willowbank?? i heard something about a 15.2 or something worse then previously..

went to willowbank and only got one run in. there was a huge storm and the event was cancelled. heaps of wheel spin and ran a 15.3.

got it tuned at chiptorque, not a lot more power, a little more topend.

the single afm is the holdup, once i get enough $$$ i'll install a mircotech.

with this setup as is i should be able to run quicker than 14.8, but with the tt/b's i have lost some bottom end power so i'll need to change diff gears....maybe

next time i go out to the track i'll put on some 14's and run standard rear suspension, should help the traction probs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-666976
Share on other sites

not enough!!!

it was only 4rwkw's, the total cost of the tt/b's was $200 plus dyno tune. so about 400 all up!

i really need to piss off the standard airflow meter! i was thinking...hole in the bonnet, round air filter, bonnet scoop.

BTW......for those that dyno there car in 3rd gear, i made 108rwkw's in 4th and 128rwkw's in 3rd.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-667165
Share on other sites

4rwkw?? that's bugger all! I've seen way bigger improvements with an XF throttle body conversion than a twin throttle setup. How was your torque? improvement? I noticed more torque with the a twin throttle setup then outright horsepower. but then again, I think the twin throttle setup is more wanker factor than anything. When you going out next?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-675743
Share on other sites

BTW......for those that dyno there car in 3rd gear, i made 108rwkw's in 4th and 128rwkw's in 3rd.....

Had my car dyno tuned (again) on the weekend. Told the operator to do a run in 3rd gear and another in 4th gear, made 1-3hp difference between the gears (less hp in 3rd). Don't know where you get an extra 20kw from changing a gear?!?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-678908
Share on other sites

i had it dyno'd at chip torque by Lachlan Riddel (the owner) so ring them and ask him.

Should take the car down there just for a couple of power runs and get a comparison. I was told it's more than likely the way the dyno has been calibrated.

Anyway, I've been told not to reveal my hp figure but I'll be honest with you, we did loose hp but we always knew we were going to with the mods we did.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-683815
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...