Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

High compression pistons, larger bore, balanced bottom end, stiff valve springs, aftermarket ecu, higher rev limit (assuming it is still making power)

with an na, you have engine capacity, head + ancilliaries flow, and rpm as your basics.

So if you had a 3.1/3.2L spinning to 7000rpm......

(going to a larger bore may not be a good idea, i dont know, im not an rb30e na tuning and motor building expert. its a good idea but i dont know if it will hinder the engines ability to rev or something)

my rb30e is getting a bit sick....

how much did each of your mods cost, who did it, what exactly is the mod, where is peak power, whats the powerband like etc???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-615498
Share on other sites

how much did each of your mods cost, who did it, what exactly is the mod, where is peak power, whats the powerband like etc???

the cam is a SURECAM (btw surecam make all the cams for chiptorque, and for the rb30 hp1,hp2,hp3 it's the same cam)

headwork was also done by surecam. double springs, lifter boxes machined, port-n-polish.

104rwkw's on the chiptorque dyno, power comes on strong 2500-7000

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-615645
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
without n2o or turbo!

Turbo is probably the best bang for buck though! can probably pick up the bits you need for under $1k, and run low boost (6psi or so) on standard n/a block without too many dramas.

or the twin cam head conversion also (may as well get a turbo head put on if you're doing that).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-638082
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
let us know how you ran at willowbank?? i heard something about a 15.2 or something worse then previously..

went to willowbank and only got one run in. there was a huge storm and the event was cancelled. heaps of wheel spin and ran a 15.3.

got it tuned at chiptorque, not a lot more power, a little more topend.

the single afm is the holdup, once i get enough $$$ i'll install a mircotech.

with this setup as is i should be able to run quicker than 14.8, but with the tt/b's i have lost some bottom end power so i'll need to change diff gears....maybe

next time i go out to the track i'll put on some 14's and run standard rear suspension, should help the traction probs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-666976
Share on other sites

not enough!!!

it was only 4rwkw's, the total cost of the tt/b's was $200 plus dyno tune. so about 400 all up!

i really need to piss off the standard airflow meter! i was thinking...hole in the bonnet, round air filter, bonnet scoop.

BTW......for those that dyno there car in 3rd gear, i made 108rwkw's in 4th and 128rwkw's in 3rd.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-667165
Share on other sites

4rwkw?? that's bugger all! I've seen way bigger improvements with an XF throttle body conversion than a twin throttle setup. How was your torque? improvement? I noticed more torque with the a twin throttle setup then outright horsepower. but then again, I think the twin throttle setup is more wanker factor than anything. When you going out next?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-675743
Share on other sites

BTW......for those that dyno there car in 3rd gear, i made 108rwkw's in 4th and 128rwkw's in 3rd.....

Had my car dyno tuned (again) on the weekend. Told the operator to do a run in 3rd gear and another in 4th gear, made 1-3hp difference between the gears (less hp in 3rd). Don't know where you get an extra 20kw from changing a gear?!?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-678908
Share on other sites

i had it dyno'd at chip torque by Lachlan Riddel (the owner) so ring them and ask him.

Should take the car down there just for a couple of power runs and get a comparison. I was told it's more than likely the way the dyno has been calibrated.

Anyway, I've been told not to reveal my hp figure but I'll be honest with you, we did loose hp but we always knew we were going to with the mods we did.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30243-rb30-mods/#findComment-683815
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...