Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey people,

Put an RB25 with a few mods in my R32 & am currently trying to decide what sort of aftermarket ECU setup I want to go with.

Have been considering a Nistune, etc remap of standard ECU, Power FC or something like Haltech.

Just after some opinions on the pros & cons of both AFM & MAP sensor based ECUs.

I know AFMs can suffer stalling, etc due to reversion of air when throttle is suddenly shut but a BOV should solve most of this, yeah?

Also, obviously with a MAP sensor, you do not need to purchase upgraded AFMs...

So while the Haltech is more expensive than the other options, by the time I buy a Z32 AFM & EBC (which the Haltech also has) I will be getting close to spending the same money. I just dont know heaps about MAP sensor based tuning...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/
Share on other sites

Hey people,

Put an RB25 with a few mods in my R32 & am currently trying to decide what sort of aftermarket ECU setup I want to go with.

Have been considering a Nistune, etc remap of standard ECU, Power FC or something like Haltech.

Just after some opinions on the pros & cons of both AFM & MAP sensor based ECUs.

I know AFMs can suffer stalling, etc due to reversion of air when throttle is suddenly shut but a BOV should solve most of this, yeah?

Also, obviously with a MAP sensor, you do not need to purchase upgraded AFMs...

So while the Haltech is more expensive than the other options, by the time I buy a Z32 AFM & EBC (which the Haltech also has) I will be getting close to spending the same money. I just dont know heaps about MAP sensor based tuning...

Did your tuner give you a short list of ECU's to choose from, or recommend one more than the others that he prefers to use?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043275
Share on other sites

Im selling a cheap MAP-ECU at the moment

(shameless plug)

going Power-fc instead for my track-RB26

www.map-ecu.com

in my Rb25 I am using an AEM F/IC-8, like a greddy emanage, but runs off manifold pressure not air flow meters

seeing 225awkw / 240rwkw at 14psi

with a 18psi actuator Im hoping for around 250kw at the wheels

lap-top tuneable

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043282
Share on other sites

Havent really decided on a tuner yet. So far have done all work to car myself however this I obviously cant. Took my car to a shop recently for some diagnostic work & he suggested Haltech & strongly suggested I stay away from Nistune.

The other advantage to the Haltech is a friend of a friend used to work installing & tuning Wolf's & now deals with Haltech so can possibly get a very good price.

However, saying that, Im still quite open to any ECU, then will find someone to tune it.

Have just been looking at Link...

Why do you ask? Do you have any other suggestions for ECU choice?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043294
Share on other sites

haltech,autronic, are the main stream ones id look into. all around 2k.

ems,vipec,link,adaptronic,wolf. "can" be just as good but due to there low usage tuning can be abit hard to find.

microtech is good but from past experiances on there older models tuning resolution is abit poor. not sure on there newer "LT" models

motec is very good, but unless its a top of the line m800 etc etc tuning software is still dos based and the fact you have to "buy" options for them ontop of there already high price is abit of a turn off.

my pic of the bunch is autronic. very reliable and easy to tune. (ie: low cost of tuning)

id steer clear of a maf only ecu. (i say maf only because most of the above ecus can run a maf sensor aswell,) makes plumning easier and a map sensor is far better than a 20 year old air flow meter that maxes out and then is tuned by a good guess..

power fc is a great choice for plug and play, but autronic and haltech and motec do plug ecus. either in the stock case or use a patch loom.

cheeres.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043364
Share on other sites

Pick your Tuner 1st. Haltech Platinum is as good as it gets for full aftermarket but the MAF Option is not yet functional.

Any tuner that cant see the benefits of Nistune on a road car should be avoided.

Yesterday we gave up on a wild GTR with PFC that gave nothing but trouble to 1/2 of WAs tuners and fitted a Nistune, Problem solved.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043830
Share on other sites

Not another one of these threads... :)

There have been similar debates in the past.

If someone is telling you to stay away from Nistune - in all honesty - i would be questioning why they would say that and if they actually have enough of an idea about products to say that.

Cost vs gain, Nistune is the best bang for buck for mild/medium street cars and uses everything required for a car to run factory with a better tune (ie cold start, idle return, under load with A/C on etc etc).

Nistune is also a piece of piss to tune, very cheap tuning costs as its very simple, Nissan has done everything for you remember, you're just adjusting a few table/settings as opposed to a Haltech for example where you have to do the entire thing from scratch which means a big $$$ bill for a FULL Tuned ECU to the level that Nistune would offer.

I've never had issues with any of my AFM cars - except where i replaced a dead AFM with two 2nd hand ones.

Both started playing up a few weeks later, intermittent and took a few weeks to sus out. That way my own fault though :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043861
Share on other sites

ok. As I say I was leaning toward Nistune but this guy sorta put me off. Reckons there are still too many glitches at the moment & I had heard stuff about TPS problems, etc but from recent searches these seem solved...

My other concern is, as some of you may know, I have recently written many threads about my car overfueling on idle.

My injector pulse is 7ms & AFM signal is around 2v.

This guy & another well known tuiner have told me its due to too many mods for standard ECU, playing havoc with airflow.

It sounds like Nistune leaves the idle setup very standard so will this fix my problem?

I assume fuel maps, etc at idle CAN be played with if necessary?

cheers for the opinions so far guys

Edited by wlspn
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304581-maf-vs-map-ecus/#findComment-5043920
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...