Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Debt-Ridden JAL to Apply for Receivership

Japan Airlines (JAL) will apply for court receivership on Jan. 19. With huge losses caused by lax management, JAL is now incapable of sustaining itself. The application for court receivership reflects the Japanese government's will to revive the flagship carrier, the local media says.

JAL will submit the application with a district court in Tokyo on the 19th, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported Sunday. Right after the application, the Enterprise Turnaround Initiative Corp. (ETIC) will take charge of the ailing airline's restructuring process, including cutting 13,000 staff over the next three years. Under the restructuring plan, the airline will also stop offering services to 47 unprofitable destinations, domestic and overseas.

ETIC will provide 300 billion yen to JAL while creditors will give up on bonds worth 350 billion yen. JAL's liabilities amount to about 800 billion yen. With a view to establishing strong leadership, ETIC has asked Kazuo Inamori, chairman emeritus of precision equipment maker Kyocera, to become the CEO. Meanwhile, it has decided not to accept investment offers from American Airlines and Delta Air Lines.

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304722-jal-in-receivership/
Share on other sites

I hope JAL rots and burns. ANA also. Any nation that insists on denying any other commercial carrier onto its domestic routes, and allows them to price-fix each other (yet supposedly they are two separate companies?), and play protectionist, 'boys-club' monopolist business practices deserves to rot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
×
×
  • Create New...