Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my gf was on a business trip to Japan for a while.. she saw a couple of the v35 and said its looks MUCH better than in pics.... also commented on the cute beachboy style guy whose driving it ... :)

I think it's sorta like this. I think the V35 is a nice car in the same way that the Z33 is a nice car. But both these cars are perhaps a tad 'diluted' in concept and design compared to their predeccessors. That's ok. I think the intended target audience for the Z33/V35 has aged a bit. Styling is personal I suppose and I think everyone complains about common styling themes but in what is supposed to be a flagship design... "me too" styling doesn't cut it.

At $70,000 for a Z33 and I would imagine something like $100,000+ for a V35... what do people really want?

A Series 2 R34 GT-R? A Series 3 R33 GT-R? Even an RX8? You might say that we're all pretty young here with slightly more hard edged aspirations than the z33/v35.

T.

T

your right on those accounts, nice cars, but there is soooo much potential as the HKS article highlighted. I wouldnt knock back a 350z if I was given one, or even got it cheap, but the driving is blah due to the breathless feel of the top end and "too short" go-kart handling that doesn't lend itself to hi-po control. I think the reports show the V35 to be a superior car to the Z overall, I just despise Nissan for not bringing out the V35 and pretending the Z is a top of the line stonk mobile.

Pricewise a Z is 60K and an RX8 70K and I'm not a fan of the RX8. There is no push in the back.... ever, no matter how good it handles. No idea what a V35 350GT might go for but not far off a Z due to inherent similarities.

Styling is such a critical thing but look at all new cars around that class and there is a fair amount of commonality, and ignore our cars as these are trying for that distinctly euro feel. Note the new Mk II and Chaser from Toyota in their styling, for the period released they were looking decidedly BMWish. If a GTR came out with the standard differences of tougher styling, pumped guards, more power TT and 4wd but still very much a V35 we would probably warm to it after a while, then get passionate about it once used to it, but how many would be in a position to own???

I still can't afford an R33 GTR yet, and choose to stick to R33 GTSt for the driving style, but you get what I mean. I drove my mates 180 with RB20 and....yeah OK, but I wouldn't own one....it's just not me. Don't like the styling but still a good machine that keeps others happy.

I even drove the arse off an S2000 2 days ago, flogging that 9000rpm redline and getting the hot blonde I was doing the negotiating for squealing in excitement. We drove past some cute teenie girlies and she got stared daggers, which is a nice feeling but I think that other than that engine, it's puss and the handlings flawed and the clutch won't hold a fast change from first to second at full noise.

Horses for courses, I 'spose. Iv'e shown my lack of good taste and just prefer performance to looks, at the expense of performance.

if no one has suggested it yet, get the V35 coupe, but chuck in any of the RB motors in!!! I've seen workshops in japan fit the RB26 in the 350z, i'm sure they can fit them in the V35. As for styling, i've seen the coupe in america when I went overseas. When you see it in person, it looks a lot more sexier than in pictures, and, to me at least, it doesn't remind me of the 350z anymore. My opinion anyways.

HKS can do anything they like with their unlimited budget though. I'm talking about cheap factory turbo options. I presume if a factory turbo option is made they will make a new front bar to accommodate a fmic.

Looking at the V35 and 350Z side by side the Skyline looks even uglier :)

Styling is such a critical thing but look at all new cars around that class and there is a fair amount of commonality, and ignore our cars as these are trying for that distinctly euro feel.

I agree there, as ex_zero said, pictures don't quite do the V35 justice. Seeing them in person (coupe and sedan) practically every day, I find that theres very little similarity between the Fairlady Z and the V35... strange, but true. But a heck of a lot of Japanese cars are trying to do that soft-hard edged look which doesn't always work, eg: Teana/Maxima.

Note the new Mk II and Chaser from Toyota in their styling, for the period released they were looking decidedly BMWish.

The current Mark II looks BMWish? Or the JZX100?

There's an R34 with a twin turbo VQ motor conversion (Top Secret from memory). There's plenty of space to the sides and front (obviously) for turbos and FMIC respectively.

You would expect this due to the fact that the nose of the 34 is big enough to hold the RB.

I was surprised there was enough room between the towers for the twin N1 turbos.

T.

You can sorta see the progression from 32-33-34 but just like how the 32 was something quantum over the 31 maybe given time, we'll see the 35 in the same way.

Fair go tony! :);):)

I reckon there is more resemblance between the R31 and the R34...

than the R34 and R32/33

the 34 have more squarer lines etc much like the R31's had.

Save for the interior of the R31 though (it was the 80's afterall)

And i agrre with a few others, it donest do it for me at all.

Yeah it's not too bad looking, but it doesnt quite keep with the past 15 years.

Or you can even go back to the KPGC10 etc, the R31-34 compared to it... you can very much see how styling has changed but still carries the influence from many years prior

I agree there, as ex_zero said, pictures don't quite do the V35 justice. Seeing them in person (coupe and sedan) practically every day, I find that theres very little similarity between the Fairlady Z and the V35... strange, but true. But a heck of a lot of Japanese cars are trying to do that soft-hard edged look which doesn't always work, eg: Teana/Maxima.  

The current Mark II looks BMWish? Or the JZX100?

Son-na, Ahona!

my mistake, not the new one, the 100. They are looking pretty good though and would have been a better choice in aus than Camry or Avalon.

Enough thread hijack. Back to Skylines!!

Im not particularly fond of it... in my eyes it has completely lost the hardcore edge and design that made the R3 series skylines what they are. They probably have a nice engine, but I just cant like the styling of the car at this point in time. I know its a completely new car not an evolution of the R3 series, but when you mention to someone the name Skyline they think of GTR's winning bathurst etc. In my opinion, this new breed of skyline looks wimpy.

But then again it comes down to the saying "beautiy is in the eye of the beholder". :(

hey Rezz,

just wondering how much the v35 will cost you on the road....in aus dollars if you could convert.....

As im just wondering why you dont go for a r32 r33 r34 gtr instead? how would they compare in price?

cheers and good luck with the v35...

I've seen the G35 (akaV35) state side.

It's way nicer in the metal.

So long as you don't get one of those crappy looking 350Z or Soarer TT lookalikes.

BTW whats the V35 going for in Japan ATM ? Not that I can afford to buy just curious. :headspin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Brooooo Please send ABS control unit schematic Please! R33 gts25t ABS (Its two plug ecu, black and white) wire colors possible? [email protected]
    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
×
×
  • Create New...