Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here ya go, all you need to know about rotaries:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ro...ck-t287781.html

rotaries are quite stable, efficient and reliable in stock N/A form. its only when tards thrash the living daylights out of twin turbo variants that you get reliability issues.

Here ya go, all you need to know about rotaries:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ro...ck-t287781.html

Wow, that was... er... informative.

Still, mostly there seems to be an agreement that they are little poorly on the torque unless they are turbo'd, so I think I'll stick with what I sort of understand, which in this case appears to be a reasonably well built straight 6 that does not eat three dinosaurs every five miles.

Mind you, whatever you think of the exhaust note of a rotary, it would be pretty darn suprising coming from an old bus leaving the lights with the duals smoking nicely...

VS ecotec and onwards feel the most refined of the 3.8 litre engines to me. They were at their most powerful (in factory form) from this point onwards and also pretty easy to find in long block form. All buick 3800 engines have a ton of interchangeable parts; heads off one onto blocks of another etc. Nice compact engines, not too difficult to work on. Maybe just give it some research first and see how feasible it is for you.

Avoid the T5 gearboxes for towing...they will stand up as a daily or to carry light loads, but it's not uncommon to break teeth in heavy duty applications. The T5 was superseded by the Getrag 260 (AKA M34, a 5 speed European made BMW style gearbox) which came in the VS series 2/3, VT, VX and VY Commodores with V6 engines - these are fairly strong gearboxes and would be up for towing, but some have oil supply issues and they cost a pretty penny to repair if something goes wrong. Seeing you're doing an engine/gearbox conversion anyway, I'd opt for something like a Supra 5 speed (can get some nice short bus/truck ratios in the W55 version, plus there are kits out there to fit them to any vehicle/engine)...or a T56 from an LS engined Holden if you can afford it.

I wasn't ragging on rotaries, just giving him the 50 page thread that if one has the patience to read past the first page will teach you nearly everything you need to know about rotaries lol.

VS ecotec and onwards feel the most refined of the 3.8 litre engines to me. They were at their most powerful (in factory form) from this point onwards and also pretty easy to find in long block form. All buick 3800 engines have a ton of interchangeable parts; heads off one onto blocks of another etc. Nice compact engines, not too difficult to work on. Maybe just give it some research first and see how feasible it is for you.

Avoid the T5 gearboxes for towing...they will stand up as a daily or to carry light loads, but not uncommon to break teeth in heavy duty applications. Seeing you're doing an engine/gearbox conversion anyway, I'd opt for something like a Supra 5 speed (can get some nice short bus ratios in the W55)...or a T56 if you can afford it.

Great advice, thank you.

on the fuel economy for a second, a falcon motor towing a caravan or anything like that will obviously use more fuel, but not that much more than what a rb30 will. also the extra fuel economy is only partly due to the extra weight but more to do with the massive increase in drag caused by towing a car on a trailer or a caravan, and the extra rolling resistance of the tyres. stick the motor in a bus and it will perform differently.

also if using a falcon or commodore motor i would have it reving a bit higher on the highway than the car it came out of. this will actually help a bit with fuel economy. you will be reving higher but you won't be labouring the motor as much so will be using less throttle % and therefore less fuel. that is the problem with the aussie motors. the diffs in them are so tall that the moment they get any sort of load on them the fuel economy goes to shit. despite the fact that they are only reving low you still have your foot a fair way down. but get them higher in the revs but with less throttle and they aren't that bad. in the standard car they will use under 10L/100km on the highway without a trailer on.

if you were to use an auto box out of the commodore or falcon, just make sure to fit an oil cooler. if going a manual i would get a heavy duty clutch as well.

as for commodores cracking heads, etc, that was mainly in the earlier models, like vn's etc, and was generally caused by people raping the arse out of them.

talking about the diesels, yes they will take reving at high revs for ages. my mate had an old nissan navara diesel that used to rev at 4200rpm on the highway. was slow as buggery though, even after the engine was rebuilt. if going to go diesel i would go a 4.2L out of the later model patrols, but they will set you back more money than you are probably willing to spend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No. Turbo shuffle and surge/flutter are not the same thing. Specifically, on a GTR, turbo shuffle has a definite meaning. On a GTR, the twin turbos are assumed to be the same thing and to operate the same way, exactly. In reality, they do not. Their exhaust sides are fed and exhaust a little differently, to each other. Their inlet sides are fed and exhausted a little differently, to each other. Consequently, when they are "working" they are often at slightly different points on the compressor map compared to each other. What this means, particularly when coming on boost, is that one of them will spool up and start producing extra flow compared to the other, which will put back pressure on that other compressor, which will push the operating point on that other compressor up (vertically). This will generally result in it bumping up against the surge line on the map, but even if it doesn't, it upsets the compressor and you get this surging shuffle back and forth between them That is "turbo shuffle" on a GTR. It is related to other flutter effects heard on other turbo systems, but it is a particular feature of the somewhat crappy outlet piping arrangement on RB26s. There are plenty of mods that have been attempted with varying levels of success. People have ground out and/or welded more material into the twin turbo pipe to try to prevent it. Extending the divider inside it works, removing material doesn't. There are aftermarket replacement twin turbo pipes available, and these exist pretty mush purely because of this shuffle problem.
    • You can temporarily* use lock collars to keep it in place until you can do the bushes, back the nuts off, slide them in, snug back up. *temporarily is often for ever
    • Thanks for the quick reply. To be clear, when you say turbo shuffle do you mean turbo flutter "stustustu" or referring to something else? I had thought they were the same thing. When I wrote the post my intention was to say it wasn't a flutter/compression surge sound. My understanding was that a flutter sound would be occurring when throttle is released, whereas I can keep the throttle in the same position for this noise
    • Hi everyone, I've been wrestling with this for a while now and have been trying to find out the cause. For context, the turbos used are Garrett 2860 -5s, the BOV is a BNR32 HKS SSQV IV kit, the car is currently tuned to ~470 whp on 17.5 psi. The car drives normally, pulls well when it doesn't happen, and I can replicate it fairly easily. It does not sound like turbo shuffle or flutter. The engine has only a thousand or so miles and has had this behavior since it was completed. After my engine was built for my R32 GTR, I noticed that the car now sometimes makes an air discharge sound on what appears to be positive boost pressure that sounds really similar to a BOV. I had thought that it was a BOV issue but even when replacing it with a brand new unit, the sound persisted. It seems like it's coming from the passenger side but I may be mistaken. The closest scenario I could find was this post here https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/ started by @yakshii and it sounds very similar. As in, at partial throttle once I reach positive boost I begin to hear the same psh psh psh psh psh sound like air is leaking somewhere when I keep the throttle in the same position. It most commonly happens in 4th gear at around 3-3.5k RPM and 5th gear around 2.5-3k RPM, which seems to coincide with normal positive boost thresholds. It might be similar to what @Austrian GTR mentioned about his own HKS SSQV. Notable difference would be that when he applies more throttle when it happens, it stops. In my scenario if I apply more throttle during this repeated psh psh psh sound, the cadence of the sound gets faster and louder rather than stopping. If I lift off slightly and apply throttle again, it will normally stop and pull without issue. I've checked all rubber couplers to ensure that they are tight, but have not gotten the opportunity to properly do a pressurized boost leak test. If anyone has had similar experiences or thoughts on what might be the cause, I'd be very keen to hear them. I also have a video of it happening from inside the cabin, if that would make it easier to understand: https://youtu.be/2zqZXcx8jbA
×
×
  • Create New...