Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im looking at running braided oil drains because of the hot stainless manifold just wouldering what size weld on dash fittings would fit best -8 or -10? im thinking of welding a fitting on the end of the bit that comes of the block and another one on the drain bit of the turbo? just wondering what size fitting?

cheers

Use this gear over the drains, if you CBF'd using an fittings

http://www.mpsracing.com/products/Earls/Flame_Guard.asp

id rather use fittings in think? the drain is like 3mm of the manifold. would -10 be ok or should i go to a -12?

That flame guard stuff is useless if it gets too close to the manifold, mine has dried out and just crumbles when you touch it.

-10 on the drain will be fine

ATP, GCG etc all sell an drain adaptors for around $30-40 and I'm using a speedflow adaptor out of the block (currently rubber on a hose tail but will be repacing shortly).

ATP-FLA-019_450.jpg

oilreturn.jpg

Steel pipe will be ALOT more durable than any braided lines when mounted close to a heat scource, reguardless of what you wrap them in. The red firesleve (aeroquip) is designed to be a flash flame protection cover not an absolute thermal barrier for 1200 deg C...

My suggestion is to use the standard or standard style drain tube. Get the drain tube to line up 5 or 6 cm from the drain fitting on the block and use a short peice of high temp rated hose, with good quality stainless steel hose clamps to join them. As long as you flare the ends of both tubes, the hose will never come off.

If your super woried about leaks, just double clamp each end.

My 2 cents

Justin

^ I think they can input whatever they want.

I can see this being another classic SAU discussion.

make a solid oil drain pipe out of stainless dont even need to worry about mandrels just keep it flowing down wards and lobster back style it.. than use 3/4" aeroquip hose from the drain pipe to the fittin on the block. usually takes me about 20-30 minutes to knock one together, its never goin to melt because its to close to the manifold, its never goin to run the risk of collapsing

Waz191.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
    • The BES920 is like the Toyota Camrys of coffee machines. E61 group head is cool, however the time requirements for home use makes it less desirable. The Toyota Camry coffee machine runs twin boilers and also PID temp control, some say it produces coffees as good as an E61 group head machine.
    • And yes with a full tank it will hit limiter free revving or driving 6B6CDF6E-4094-426D-A9CB-6C553475FE36.mp4
    • One way of putting the fuel surge idea to rest, is that even when in neutral/clutch in or free revving it still has the same issue, it can’t even get to limiter (7800) so to me that says it can’t be g force, I’m not trying to argue I just want to find the f&$king issue 😡
×
×
  • Create New...