Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Folks,

I was wondering if one of the hotshot engine builders on here would give me some advice. Im in the process of doing my very first full/ground up engine build and im having some issues with oil clearances. I am using plastigague as a measuring tool and I want to double check im doing it correctly. The plastigauge "splat" matched up to the card between 0.050mm and the 0.038mm marks giving me an estimated clearance of around 0.046mm (ish) do i then divide that figure by 2 to give me the actual clearance of 0.023mm? IE: Bang on the Nissan spec of 0.022-0.046 mm??

Or is my actual clearance 0.046 (ie: on the very limit of the OEM specs)

I think im right that the plastigauge figure has to be divided by two to account for the two oil surfaces (one on each side of the crank) but i just want to be 100% sure.

I measured the BE bearing and that came out at dead on 0.050mm which if i divided it by 2 would be bang on spec, but if it's not then i think im way out.

The engine is an R32 RB26DETT with a brand new ACL standard size bearings. Crank has been polished and nothing else.

Cheers

Chris

Edited by Guishnu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309592-rb26dett-oil-clearance-question/
Share on other sites

If your engine is upside down the crank is fully rested against the bearing material on the low side so your measuring the clearance on the high side (sum of both clearances) no need to divide by 2.

That said i no longer (since i was an apprentice) use plastigage as it is not precise enough, it will often read tighter than it actually is giving you a loose engine. A mic is the only way to go TBH

see stolen interwebs picture.

post-34927-1267055244_thumb.jpg

mic first...plasti second.

yep thats right...i measure twice...using each method.

I know of an engine that failed very recently that would have been saved if the builder used this method, as the plastigage would have picked up the huge error in his micrometer.

its just a good double check of the micrometer measurements and its not as inaccurate as one may think if used correctly.

mic first...plasti second.

yep thats right...i measure twice...using each method.

I know of an engine that failed very recently that would have been saved if the builder used this method, as the plastigage would have picked up the huge error in his micrometer.

its just a good double check of the micrometer measurements and its not as inaccurate as one may think if used correctly.

Not disagreeing with you here Paul, and anything that works for you has gotta be a good thing as you build a mean engine.

The example you provided with the micrometer having an error? If measured properly and the micrometer calibrated correctly and the engineer all doing their job correctly, any error in a micrometer can be picked up without needing plasti gauge to back it up.

If you use the same micrometer for the journal measurement as you do for the tunnel measurement, the micrometer doesn't even have to be accurate, it just has to be consistent.

Not disagreeing with you here Paul, and anything that works for you has gotta be a good thing as you build a mean engine.

The example you provided with the micrometer having an error? If measured properly and the micrometer calibrated correctly and the engineer all doing their job correctly, any error in a micrometer can be picked up without needing plasti gauge to back it up.

If you use the same micrometer for the journal measurement as you do for the tunnel measurement, the micrometer doesn't even have to be accurate, it just has to be consistent.

Using just plastigage and nothing else is folly in the extreme...i understand exactly what you were saying and also what you have just said above. Im assuming the tunnels and the journals must have been measured on different equipment or even different days? It didn't sound right to me but that was the excuse he provided to the customer.

A quick check of mic. calibration with the setting bars is also a good idea each time it is pulled out of the case as well.

the engine in question had a huge knock on startup...big mistake that could have been easily picked up.

Edited by DiRTgarage
mic first...plasti second.

yep thats right...i measure twice...using each method.

I know of an engine that failed very recently that would have been saved if the builder used this method, as the plastigage would have picked up the huge error in his micrometer.

its just a good double check of the micrometer measurements and its not as inaccurate as one may think if used correctly.

Not a bad comparo, some one pm'd it to me today (mirrored what i was saying earlier)

http://www.carcraft.com/techfaq/116_0701_p...eter/index.html

I'll pull out the crank, clean, replace and re-check the measurements.

If the big end clearances are too big, can i get a few thou machined off the cap face to tighten them up? Same with the main bearing gurdle?

I'll pull out the crank, clean, replace and re-check the measurements.

If the big end clearances are too big, can i get a few thou machined off the cap face to tighten them up? Same with the main bearing gurdle?

Lol

Never mind - I know milling the caps isn't possible.

I’m even more retarded then usual (but it's always good to make 110% sure!)

Oil Clearances

Mains

OEM Standard Bearings 0.028mm ~ 0.046mm / 0.0011” ~ 0.0018” with a limit of 0.090mm/0.0035”

Big Ends

OEM Standard Bearings 0.020mm ~ 0.039mm / 0.0007” ~ 0.0015” with a limit of 0.090mm/0.0035”

My mains are running 0.046mm/0.0018” (aprox)

My big ends are running 0.050mm/0.0020” (aprox)

So I’m golden.

Few.

Edited by Guishnu

Any comments. Machining your crank, Measuring up your bearings to your exact chosen spec's, after then, bolting on your sump, then bolting on the head with let's say with a multi layered steel shimmed head gasket. Any changers to your bearing measurement's after this process?

  • 2 months later...
Thread revival!

Where in the bearing tunnel is the best spot to measure for clearance?

Should the caps be torqued up with out the crank inplace or...?

put in your bearings, then mains caps, girdle and bolts that you will use (torques down). measure each main tunnel. U can measure at different spots on each tunnel. at say 12 and 6, 2 and 8, 4 and 10 o'clock etc.then measure up each journal of the crank. If the clearances are too big then you can get the caps machined down and the block line bored again to a size that is more appropriate.

Edited by GTR1993

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am getting the same issue. Did you resolve it? I just got it after installing my new super coppermix and literally the same issue, new fork, new 18mm carrier, release bearing that came with the kit and replicated the exact same sound. 
    • If you like - I have the STL files so I can email em. There's a couple of gotchas (i.e the holes are not threaded so you might need/will need) to utilize some M3 melt-in threads for some of the points. However if you want to be super accurate, and are willing to remove your calipers and your SHOCKS it's a really good tool. You also might need to scale the part that measures the tyre width a bit wider. It defaults to a 7.5in tyre and I mean who is running that. Luckily with the magic of CAD this is very easy to rescale.
    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
×
×
  • Create New...