Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alright guys, get ready for some very likely noob questions, but i promise i have searched, just trying to wrap my head around the situation atm, right now i have 2 R32 GTS-t's, a 2dr with an RB26, with engine mods, and a 4dr with an RB20, no engine mods.

Now ideally i'd like to put a big setup in the 4dr, but i'm trying to figure out which direction to go. i have been looking into RB30's for quite some time (always the R32 RB25DE head on RB30e block), but this new car with RB26 has thrown some possibilities in the mix. my main issue is keeping the car able to go through regency (inspection) with ease. changing turbos is fine, but changing engines each time for regency is too much. so what the engine i run must past regency, i dont mind bolting on/off a few bits though, just not whole engine blocks or heads.

I guess my first idea was just keep the RB26 and put it into the 4dr without fiddling about. problem is having to engineer it, and from what i understand, just arent cutting it compared to the RB30's (as sad as i am to say it). RB30/25's however can look identical to RB20's, and with a restamping, will get through regency.

but RB26 heads are better, and i have one now, with all the mods ready, including full turbo setup (T78). so if i could go a RB30/26, not only would it be easier having everything already, but better.

i guess my first question is, is the extra performance really worth it from the RB26 head? i dont plan on pushing much more than 350rwkw to start with, but i love my revs, so the revability of the 26 head interests me, im just not sure if there's any point in a revvier head if the bottom end will have dramas with the revs first.

My 2nd question is in regard to the visual side of things, ive read up on swapping valve and cam covers, but couldnt find any definitive answer. i want to put RB20 covers on a RB26 head. i know it sounds ridiculous, and with the plenum and other obvious differences, it will probably be useless for regency, but still useful for police.

3rd question is, can the RB26 exhaust manifolds be modified to suit a RB25DE head (if i chose that route)? i dont feel like parting out the turbo kit, would rather use it all. from what ive read it's just the bolt pattern.

4thly, i have an RB26 powerFC, from what i understand these can be used on RB20's, therefore i assume on a R32 RB25DE head. i believe the issue is with the RB20 running one AFM as opposed to 2 on the RB26, but as ill be running the T78 kit which runs 2x Z32 AFM's, this shouldnt be an issue right?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/311900-a-few-oddball-questions/
Share on other sites

you noob, this is all illegal and devious... i like it :)

i reckon you should go 30 with 26head, then the T78 would be even awesomer.

if your gonna do a restamp then you can do whatever you want anyway.

the 30 sits abit too high in the engine bay so you have to work that out

i guess my first question is, is the extra performance really worth it from the RB26 head? i dont plan on pushing much more than 350rwkw to start with, but i love my revs, so the revability of the 26 head interests me, im just not sure if there's any point in a revvier head if the bottom end will have dramas with the revs first.

My 2nd question is in regard to the visual side of things, ive read up on swapping valve and cam covers, but couldnt find any definitive answer. i want to put RB20 covers on a RB26 head. i know it sounds ridiculous, and with the plenum and other obvious differences, it will probably be useless for regency, but still useful for police.

3rd question is, can the RB26 exhaust manifolds be modified to suit a RB25DE head (if i chose that route)? i dont feel like parting out the turbo kit, would rather use it all. from what ive read it's just the bolt pattern.

4thly, i have an RB26 powerFC, from what i understand these can be used on RB20's, therefore i assume on a R32 RB25DE head. i believe the issue is with the RB20 running one AFM as opposed to 2 on the RB26, but as ill be running the T78 kit which runs 2x Z32 AFM's, this shouldnt be an issue right?

Similar issues I went through here in Vic, and hence I chose the RB26DETT (twin T config).

So

1. The head, more so the ITB’s are where the business happens. Mating ITB’s to a RB25 head is a bit of work, if you can go the 26 factory route, works out basically the same cost. (#3 is related, see later)

2. Not sure, might as well engineer it with a RB26 in there. Realistically it’s not a lot different to engineering with a RB25 I wouldn’t have thought. Give a NEO is 206kw, as is a RB26

3. They can, but same as #1, you need adaptors made up which again is more cost and effort – might as well start with a 26 rather than go adaptors for intake and exhaust, it’ll cost you more to do that than the RB26 route would have.

4. Not gonna touch that one :)

Overall if you can get a RB25 NEO engineered in SA, there is no reason you cannot get the RB26 done.

So if you did go the RB26 route…

- Lowmount turbos are invisible. 330-340rwkw with GT-SS’s is nice and super responsive. Don't need to swap a thing = bonus!

- The PFC is a 30 sec swap over to a factory ECU = bonus!

- All that leaves really is injectors and Nismo AFM’s to swap out for any inspection really... 45mins work if you slow.

The other options you have are for you to weigh up really against the above. I say go RB26 if you are worried about legalities.

The effort to get it engineered, once done, will be worth it. Nice, legal, easy power without much stress/worry should you be defected.

These were my main reasons for going RB26 for mine.

you noob, this is all illegal and devious... i like it :thumbsup:

i reckon you should go 30 with 26head, then the T78 would be even awesomer.

if your gonna do a restamp then you can do whatever you want anyway.

the 30 sits abit too high in the engine bay so you have to work that out

lol, my car has always been about being only legal enough to get through regency. and by that, i mean if they cant tell it's illegal from an inspection, then it's legal. lol

Similar issues I went through here in Vic, and hence I chose the RB26DETT (twin T config).

So

1. The head, more so the ITB’s are where the business happens. Mating ITB’s to a RB25 head is a bit of work, if you can go the 26 factory route, works out basically the same cost. (#3 is related, see later)

2. Not sure, might as well engineer it with a RB26 in there. Realistically it’s not a lot different to engineering with a RB25 I wouldn’t have thought. Give a NEO is 206kw, as is a RB26

3. They can, but same as #1, you need adaptors made up which again is more cost and effort – might as well start with a 26 rather than go adaptors for intake and exhaust, it’ll cost you more to do that than the RB26 route would have.

4. Not gonna touch that one :thumbsup:

Overall if you can get a RB25 NEO engineered in SA, there is no reason you cannot get the RB26 done.

So if you did go the RB26 route…

- Lowmount turbos are invisible. 330-340rwkw with GT-SS’s is nice and super responsive. Don't need to swap a thing = bonus!

- The PFC is a 30 sec swap over to a factory ECU = bonus!

- All that leaves really is injectors and Nismo AFM’s to swap out for any inspection really... 45mins work if you slow.

The other options you have are for you to weigh up really against the above. I say go RB26 if you are worried about legalities.

The effort to get it engineered, once done, will be worth it. Nice, legal, easy power without much stress/worry should you be defected.

These were my main reasons for going RB26 for mine.

thanks mate, you've touched on a few points i was thinking too.

i guess my worry is with engineering is that it's f**king expensive when u plan on doing the swap urself.

i love the RB26 (although tbh the RB20 is my first love) and it interests me more than the RB30, my main worry is once the RB26 goes, it's big $$ time. and tbh, i have to ask myself would i be better getting the high $$ asking for RB26's and spend it elsewhere?

the low mounts are a good idea, i was thinking about it the other day, but my worry is any signs of aftermarket turbos (they will check) and it's all over, that includes any new looking parts, braided lines etc etc. am i better off just having some stock turbos to swap over when its regency time.

No idea lol :thumbsup:

But i tell you now, factally, there is NO way anyone can tell you have upgraded turbo's.

GT-SS's (Garrett -9's) are the same exterior as factory. It is the wheels inside, which would mean pulling the turbo off and measuring... which simply wont happen so there is no factual way to really tell. :D

I reckon you need to find someone that's engineered a RB26 into a RB25/RB20 body over there and see what it was.

In terms of actual cost here in Vic, it was like $750 for engineers & RWC, that's all. Effort of installing was my own, but honestly it's a bolt in job expect for the wiring. Totally direct fit even into my HR31 chassis :)

engineering here is more so a joke. Costs upwards of $1500 to get it done... and more if they require additional testing.

stew have you thought about just going track only? if you have two 32's u could make one a nice street car and the other a dedicated track car with no comprimise.

No idea lol :cool:

But i tell you now, factally, there is NO way anyone can tell you have upgraded turbo's.

GT-SS's (Garrett -9's) are the same exterior as factory. It is the wheels inside, which would mean pulling the turbo off and measuring... which simply wont happen so there is no factual way to really tell. :)

I reckon you need to find someone that's engineered a RB26 into a RB25/RB20 body over there and see what it was.

In terms of actual cost here in Vic, it was like $750 for engineers & RWC, that's all. Effort of installing was my own, but honestly it's a bolt in job expect for the wiring. Totally direct fit even into my HR31 chassis :)

alright cheers man, reckon ill look into it, anyone want a T78? lol

alright cheers man, reckon ill look into it, anyone want a T78? lol

shit a week ago i could have swapped it for a brand new set of -9's.... i love the T78 especially on a rb2630.

go to the wreckers buy a na rb30 ($150-200), re-ring and shell it, bolt up the head (12mm head stud mod) and then dial in 18-19psi with the t78 and hang on. :blush:

Or forge it and h-beam it and dial in 25psi :yes:.

shit a week ago i could have swapped it for a brand new set of -9's.... i love the T78 especially on a rb2630.

go to the wreckers buy a na rb30 ($150-200), re-ring and shell it, bolt up the head (12mm head stud mod) and then dial in 18-19psi with the t78 and hang on. :blush:

Or forge it and h-beam it and dial in 25psi :yes:.

if im honest, this is what i was thinking. ill have to put a rb20 side by side with a rb26 to suss what differences besides the big things (covers, plenum etc etc) i would need to change (and what wont be able to be changed), but if so it would be nice to have a rb20 lookalike sitting in the engine bay which is actually a 26/30. even if it has a big t78 i need to cover up on the roads with some "heat shielding"

as simon mentioned, engineering is pretty f**ked here, and $1500 was roughly the figure i had in my head.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...