Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

IMO :) If you take something like ECUtech , I had this program loaded into an MY00 WRX and tweeked by MRT in Sydney and customtuned and upgraded by Mercury in Brisbane later when I'd added a few more mods.

When I purchased the tune as done in the first place I knew it was locked and that only ECUtech liscence owners/workshops could access the programe--I could however reset the thing at any time back to the last tune myself and clear fault codes like an AFM fault code if I had to replace one . the point being I purchased an already developed programme--so far so good.

If on the other hand I had however taken my car to be tuned with an aftermarket access motherboard fitted (for example) for a generic tune and I payed for that tuning work and the motherboard and the motherboad installation I fricked if I'm see why I should not have the access code as this would be a generic tune parculiar to that car.

In point of fact I would not have the work done at a workshop that would not provide the access code when the work was completed.-and payed for of course.

I would want it locked however--individual owners are not the only animals that fiddle with ECU's when other animals backs are turned.

Edited by BASHO

I disagree with saliya that ECU tuning is anything like programming a TV remote. Coming up with every possible combination in a 20x20 matrix does not constitute IP either, just demonstrates a rudimentary understanding of permutations. That set of results is useful to nobody, a good tune is.

An ECU tune may fall under copyright laws in the sense that it is data on a storage medium - like a computer file. The right to copy (or protect against copying) is held by the creator of the work, not the physical item (ECU). Similar to owning a book, you own the physical item but you have no right of copy of the words. You do however have permission to "use" the words, similar to how you have permission to use a tune by driving the car. The book analogy isn't perfect - you don't have the right to see the raw data much as you don't have the right to see Microsoft's source code for their operating systems. You're allowed to use the end result but you're not allowed to see the nuts and bolts of how it works and potentially reproduce it yourself.

I'm with warps on this one a car enthusiast has a biassed opinion on what it should be because they only see it from their own perspective. Likewise a tuner will only see it from theirs. I see no problem with a tuner locking a tune to protect their investment of time and stop people from copying it, and I see no problem with a car enthusiast wanting access to their tune and portability between tuners. Ultimately the conditions of sale need to be discussed before the tuner starts, so that everybody understands what they're walking away with - whether locked or unlocked.

I disagree with saliya that ECU tuning is anything like programming a TV remote.

I take it you're talking about 'level of difficulty'. Plainly you've never tried programming a Blaupunkt remote :ermm:

Coming up with every possible combination in a 20x20 matrix does not constitute IP either, just demonstrates a rudimentary understanding of permutations.

Agreed (I don't think it's IP).

But if coming up with one of those permutations is IP; then coming up with a superset must also be.

An ECU tune may fall under copyright laws in the sense that it is data on a storage medium - like a computer file. The right to copy (or protect against copying) is held by the creator of the work, not the physical

To be copyrightable, a work must be:

* an original expression in a tangible medium (i.e. it must physically exist)

* a type of work which is copyrightable - basically, an artistic work (like a sculpture, painting, drawing, or photograph), a building (or model thereof); a video or audio recording; or a computer program.

See http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca1968133/ for the gory details.

I don't think that an ECU tune could be classed as any of the above - so it's not copyrightable; and I believe that if it were classed as anything it would be a "computer program".

Which, as previously, the user has a legal right under the Act to view/disassemble/change for certain purposes (e.g. to correct errors, see s47E).

To summarise; a tuner may think that they have a legal basis on which they can lock a customer's ECU. I just don't think that IP or copyright laws form that legal basis.

There may well be another legal basis (e.g. EPA rules) that mandate locking an ECU - but in that situation, the new tuner should be able to unlock.

Whether or not there is a legal basis, no tuner should lock an ECU without previously advising the customer

Cheers,

SW

Edited by saliya

just out of curiosity, if the tune is locked, does that mean you can't even look at what the settings are, or can you just not change them? so for example, if i got a tune done and it was locked, can i still look at the map settings but not change them? or can i not even look at them?

the reason i ask is that if you can still view the map then the tuner isn't doing it to stop it being copied (as you could simply make up a spreadsheet and copy over the details) but they are locking it to either stop someone (the vehicle owner) playing with it and stuffing it up, or to stop you from taking it to any other tuner. now the first of those 2 i understand, however if the second is the case and the tuner won't give the password out to the new tuner, then wouldn't that would breach the anti-competition laws?

I am presuming here but it would appear in most instances to be to prevent the vehicle being taken to anyone else to tune , in any event appearance or not the net effect of installing a lock out code and then refusing to divulge it has this result.

:ermm:

Locking probably depends on the implementation. With the Nistune case reading maps to / form the ECU becomes disabled inside the firmware of the board until the correct pin is presented whilst all other functionality remains available. Nothing is fool proof and there are specific companies set up to reverse engineer and read data just about out of anything. I dont see the locking functionality used that often to be quite honest as most tunes are paritcular to a vehicle as mentioned previously and based from factory maps to begin wtih

PIN locking was requested for copy protection (prevent copying of a collection of tuned maps which may fall under copyright) and to also stop users fiddling and then causing damage and then later blaming the tuner for it. Over the years I've seen quite a few tuners maps (remembering which takes time/money to develop) then being redistributed or sold by third parties.

Some aftermarket systems require tunes built from scratch which take a lot more time as they arent provided with initial values for particular vehicles by the manufacturer. This is a lot of time getting cold start, idle and then normal operation correct.

If the tune was to be treated like a software licence with an explicit agreement, then in this case the tuner owns the copyright behind the tune whilst the customer is granted an unlimited licence to uses it. With software agreements the licence is made to the customer to use the software but not own it

However there is no specific agreement such as this with a tuner in the typical scenario of adjusting maps to tune for optimal but safe performance on a vehicle. Copyright is debateable and locking is used in some cases as a physical rather than legal (and hardly enforceable) substitute. One would think that given the scenario before, providing indication of pin locking would be a good practice if it was to be used to avoid potential problems down the track

  • 2 weeks later...
They feel it is their businesses intelectual property...not the customers...thats why they are locked.

i have a few shops around us that lock ECU's (holden and ford)..... because they use the same tune in each car and dont want others to see what they are doing.... its fraud flat out.

  • 2 weeks later...

@ "Security" the dog in your display pic scare the f**king shit outa me looks like its on roids! freaken insane!

sorry to go off topic, but i agree that locking you ecu is a bit gay but can see maybe why they do it but i deffinatly think they should tell you if they are goign to and give u the option of obtaining the password by signing a waiver or somthing

just my 2 cents

I know of some tuners that won't give out the pin at a point after the tune (like the OP's current situation) as they use the same PIN on all the cars they do :)

No way I would go to a tuner that wouldn't leave it unlocked/give me the password. I'm a big boy now, if I blow it up, I blow it up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...