Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys/girls, for some time iv been trying to findout why my car is boosting at 11.5 - 12psi

its an series 2 r34 gtt sedan sold to me by the importer as stock , ever since iv had it its booted hard and i thort that this was normal untill i drove my mates car which is stock , so i installed a psi gauge and noticed how high its boosting ,

i looked every were to see if it had a boost controller but none , i read a thred on here about earthing the solinoid to give it high boost all the time checked and its un touched , but i did earth my mates on to give him higher boost (and he loves it) but when i

was doing his car i noticed his actuator is larger than the on on my car so iv taken a photo to see if anyone here knows if this is inface an r33 actuator (iv read a post about people installing them but iv never seen a picture to tell the difference)

it does have "33" stamped in black ink so that why i think it is but sometimes that may mean someting else.

post-70954-1272157200_thumb.jpg

only mods on the car is a cat back 3" system

the reason im trying to find out is because i want to put a high flow split dump/back pipe on and an intercooler and need to be able to drop the boost back down because these things will up the boost past the turbos "safe" boosting level

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

No one can help ??? I hear people looking for and buying r33 actuators on here all the time surely someone knows how to tell what they look like ???

I didnt choose the boost this high it was already like it and i arr dont worry about it

Thanks mate so the stamped writing is the same ? This is good news . If thats the case id asume when i add the pipe and cooler i can just place a standard r34 actuator back on and ill be back to 10 or 11 psi

thanks again

well r33 actuators are 7psi acutaors, put it this way with the stock boost control it wont go higher than what it is now, why you worried about 11-12psi anyway its fine, sure your vaccum source for you boost gauge hasnt got a leak I found my r33 when just cat back and cooler boosting about 11-12 but it was a leak in the boost gauge when fixed that was about 9-10

just wondering, why do you want to drop the boost, only to add an fmic to lift the boost again? lol, this reminds me of another thread, deja vu? lol

yeah i have a similar boost, maybe even just above 12psi. but id always assumed it was the exhaust, and possible aggressive tune by previous owner. have you considered changing/high flowing your turbo? not sure on cost of those options tho

just wondering, why do you want to drop the boost, only to add an fmic to lift the boost again? lol, this reminds me of another thread, deja vu? lol

yeah i have a similar boost, maybe even just above 12psi. but id always assumed it was the exhaust, and possible aggressive tune by previous owner. have you considered changing/high flowing your turbo? not sure on cost of those options tho

Its a valid move to drop it only to raise it again with bolt-ons. A free flowing exhaust will premote better spool and response and a fmic will help prevent detonation due to high intake temuratures not to mentiong easier power with less boost as a result of cooler intake temps (intake air is more dense). just be carefull of R&R.

Also im pretty sure R34's run bout 10psi stock which might have somthething to do with having the larger OP6 turbine housing.

On a side note i would say that they respond to this better as the NEO cams have more aggressive lift (8.4mm in 8.7mm ex) due to its solid lifters.

Edited by RBceffy25
just wondering, why do you want to drop the boost, only to add an fmic to lift the boost again? lol, this reminds me of another thread, deja vu? lol

yeah i have a similar boost, maybe even just above 12psi. but id always assumed it was the exhaust, and possible aggressive tune by previous owner. have you considered changing/high flowing your turbo? not sure on cost of those options tho

i have considered upgrading the turbo but before doing that its always best to do the fmic and dump pipe so i figure ill do the main stuff to make the car run better then ill go for the perfomance upgrades,

what im thinking is if i put a dump pipe on it will raise the boost slightly so i want to be able to bring it back down as i dont need more than what im useing (for the moment anyway )

well r33 actuators are 7psi acutaors, put it this way with the stock boost control it wont go higher than what it is now, why you worried about 11-12psi anyway its fine, sure your vaccum source for you boost gauge hasnt got a leak I found my r33 when just cat back and cooler boosting about 11-12 but it was a leak in the boost gauge when fixed that was about 9-10

ill have a look but i only installed the psi guage about a month ago and the standard one before that was consistant with what i get now ,,

although i could always hear the spool up even before having a pod filter and i wondered if it was a leak but never found one (could have been the high boost )

i thort if you had a leak the guage wouldnt hold steady boost ,

also RBceffy25 when you say careful of R&R whats R&R stand for ??

ill have a look but i only installed the psi guage about a month ago and the standard one before that was consistant with what i get now ,,

although i could always hear the spool up even before having a pod filter and i wondered if it was a leak but never found one (could have been the high boost )

i thort if you had a leak the guage wouldnt hold steady boost ,

also RBceffy25 when you say careful of R&R whats R&R stand for ??

Rich and Retard. my understanding is that this occures when the intake temp is too cold (higher than standard boost with fmic usually the culprit) and the AFM defults to max air flow because the stock ecu believes ther is a large boost spike where there shouldnt be, dumps fuel, and retards the timing in order to produce less exhaust gasses to reduce boost. Only fix is turn down the boost, get aftermarket ecu or nisstune.

Anybody please feel free to correct me if im wrong in any way.

Cheers.

thanks for that ,

odd thing today i lost all my boost and power !!! the car just had nothing at all ??? the only way to fix it was to disconnect the battery and reconect and it was fine after that , does anyone know why that could happen ?

thanks for that ,

odd thing today i lost all my boost and power !!! the car just had nothing at all ??? the only way to fix it was to disconnect the battery and reconect and it was fine after that , does anyone know why that could happen ?

that sucks mate. did the malfunction indicator light come on on the dash?

cheers for the explanation above

that sucks mate. did the malfunction indicator light come on on the dash?

cheers for the explanation above

no nothing came up it just lost all revs and wouldnt boost over 5psi , it hasent happend since though ,

ok thanks for your help , so is there anyother why the car could be boosting higher ???

theres no controller and i checked for leaks and used another gauge to see if it was the gauge but my one is reading right !!!

is this something you would have to have a look at to know ??? is there anyone in the cranbourne area that may wanna have a look ???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...