Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. A little issue came about when my car went in to get tuned the other day.

It's a GT2860rs turbo, walbro 255lph pump, WRX 440cc injectors and an EMS standalone engine computer.

Now from stock, the X-Trail runs a returnless fuel set-up. i.e. no FPR, no return lines. The fuel pressure is governed at the tank, gosh darn knows how... All i know is it has about 52psi of fuel pressure in the rail, and at this 13psi of boost, its dropping.

Here's the dyno graph of power vs AFR:

(remember that power figure is at 4 wheels, not just 2!)

P1000847.jpg

P1000848.jpg

I'm starting to go lean at 13psi as you can see...

I'm not sure if my injectors are maxing out, but I wouldn't imagine they would cause this type of problem, would they?

WHATS GOING ON!??

p.s. the reason for my wacky boost curve is the dump, its getting sorted soon...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/318580-fuel-pressure-problem/
Share on other sites

the OEM fuel pressure regulation system probably isn't designed for boosted applications. Might be a good idea to rip it out set up the fuel pump to supply the fuel rail and put a FRP on the fuel return as per your normal Skyline setup

Yeah that's what i thought. I just went for a drive with the laptop hooked up looking at injector shit.

Under full boost, they never got close to maxing out, i didnt see them go over 70% even at top revs.

@ zebra, i dont really know how big they are mate...

With out a rising rate / boost referenced fuel reg the +ve manifold pressure forces back against the incoming fuel.

so although the injectors are seeing 52psi under vacuum, with 13psi in the intake they really only have 39psi of effective pressure.

which no doubt is causing the lean off.

Quote from here: http://www.aa1car.com/library/returnless_efi.htm

" A returnless fuel injection system, by comparison, manages fuel pressure a little differently. Instead of using a spring-loaded vacuum diaphragm in the regulator to change fuel delivery when throttle opening and intake vacuum change, the regulator in a returnless system operates at a constant pressure. The older return-type systems need to vary fuel pressure to maintain the same pressure differential across the injectors when intake vacuum drops. When vacuum drops, the regulator increases pressure to compensate. But in a returnless system, this isn't necessary because the line pressure is always the same.

So how does the system compensate for changes in engine load and vacuum? A returnless system uses the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) to regulate fuel delivery. A fuel pressure sensor mounted on the supply rail allows the PCM to monitor fuel pressure. When pressure in the supply rail drops as engine load or speed increase, the PCM compensates by increasing injector duration (on time) and/or the operating speed of the fuel pump."

1psi of boost basically reduces the fuel pressure by 1psi. Therefore, if the fuel pressure going in is 52psi, under 13psi of boost, the fuel rail pressure will only be 39psi! The only way to combat this is for the ecu to get more out of the injectors, however the injectors can only flow so much fuel at 39psi. I am assuming your tuner cant put in any more fuel, therefore if you dont want to change the fuel system design I believe you need bigger injectors.

Edited by Harey
Under full boost, they never got close to maxing out, i didnt see them go over 70% even at top revs.

That is very strange, I would be quizzing your tuner and saying why dont you put more fuel in??

As said above, your ecu needs to compensate for the lack of effective fuel pressure. I ran a turbocharged car with 43psi of effective fuel pressure, so I dont see why you cant on 39psi. You just need your ecu and injectors to compensate.

Edited by Harey
That is very strange, I would be quizzing your tuner and saying why dont you put more fuel in??

As said above, your ecu needs to compensate for the lack of effective fuel pressure. I ran a turbocharged car with 43psi of effective fuel pressure, so I dont see why you cant on 39psi. You just need your ecu and injectors to compensate.

Yeah Andrew did, you can see the A:FR drop rich just before it starts to go lean, so he tried. I dunno about just then if i read the duty cycle correctly, it was hard to read the computer screen, wrestle with the steering wheel from the torque steer/wheel spin AND watch the road at the same time...

Thanks for the help! looks like i might just fix this boost curve and run a flat 10psi, then avoid touching the fuel system at all, cos its a prick of a job on my car entire intake manifold needs to come off just to get to the injectors!

the OEM fuel pressure regulation system probably isn't designed for boosted applications. Might be a good idea to rip it out set up the fuel pump to supply the fuel rail and put a FRP on the fuel return as per your normal Skyline setup

Exactly what I'd do :)

Rip the shit out from the tank end, run the pump... fit a FPR up the front and run a return line back and problem solved.

Exactly what I'd do :)

Rip the shit out from the tank end, run the pump... fit a FPR up the front and run a return line back and problem solved.

Yes that would be the best solution, but its far from simple.

39psi can be enough fuel pressure if the injectors can flow enough fuel (also if the fuel pump can flow enough).

Increasing the voltage to the stock fuel pump could also be enough. It doesnt look like it needs a lot more fuel. Whether you do this by running dedicated power cables from the battery or you use a voltage amplifier.

Edited by Harey

Thatt was a great article Jeff, thanks!

For now I might focus on fixing that boost curve... 13psi is too much for what I wanted, so I think I'll address that issue rather than the fuel system... The guys in the US who mod these QR25 engines use return setups with fprs so I'll go with that sorta setup of I need more fuel. At the moment Im pretty close to the limit of the stock block and the chassis, I desperately need some suspension mods and a bit more rubber (I've only got 215s at the moment) for some better handling/traction.

I'm armed with all these options now, so that's great!

Thanks guys!

Not having enough fuel pressure in the rail seems dodgy.

If I wanted to feel comfortable driving the car hard and wanted to know the setup was solid, id do things properly.

440 injectors for 220HP is heaps. I think changing injectors out is masking the real problem of a weak fuel system.

It aint good to run shit on the limit, especially fuel.

Braise a fitting on the end of the rail, run a Sard reg, and run an extra line to the rear for the return. Also hard wire the pump. Ditch the Walbro and go 040. Piss easy.

The walbro dropped in perfectly, needed no wiring/plumbing mods at all...

So basically you probably haven't wired it correctly...

You need to ensure the pump has the correct voltage it requires!

Bolt-in does not mean "work correctly (especially on a N/A previously setup)...

So basically you probably haven't wired it correctly...

You need to ensure the pump has the correct voltage it requires!

Bolt-in does not mean "work correctly (especially on a N/A previously setup)...

I see where you're coming from, cos in theory, the bigger pump should need different voltages!

According to the guys in the US with the same motor, the walbro is a direct swap. uses the same voltage as the stock one as far as i know.

Hundreds of guys have done turbo setups, similar to mine and there's not one mention of altering the wiring at all, that's why i chose the 'bro over a bosch. They are a drop in and (usually) good for upwards of 400whp.

Just talked to Andrew on the phone and he said the pump and/or injectors are fine for well over the power im making, so im leaning (pardon the pun) towards the stock in-tank regulator doing weird things and not having enough pressure to support the boost.

Either way its not a huuge problem, its only starting to lean out on 13psi and 5500 revs, and on the street in the last 2 days, i havnt seen 13psi yet. The load on the dyno is substantially more than on the street in 1st 2nd and 3rd gears so hopefully i wont have much of an issue to deal with.

Testing the voltage is such a simple thing to check mate, to simply rule out that it's not an issue I'm not sure why it wasn't done?

Just because other people drop in and it works is great, but doesn't automatically mean that voltage isn't your problem if you've not checked it.

Ok sure I'll have a look. what should the voltage be? Won't it be hard to measure?

I was under the impression that said voltage changes with fuel needs in a returnlessn system, so it would be hard to be in the back seat with a voltmeter, when I need to vary the engine conditions to check!

Or am I mistaken?

In the 30 odd so of boosted Gen3 and 4 I've tuned I've never had an issue up to 350rwkw and 10Psi of boost using the std 1 one way fuel system - they do however have injector flow scaliing vs injector pressure drop. There is no reason to swap to a return system you have an aftermarket ECU - just tune around its not like the ems has any brains anyway. There should be no reason to assume fueling wont be consistant.

The things I would be checking is whether or there is a fuel pump controller. It maybe PWM if the std ecu is still controlling the fuel pump side of things.

Edited by rob82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...