Jump to content
SAU Community

2.5inch Dump Pipe R34 Gtt Restrictive Compared To 3inch?


Recommended Posts

hey guys

just wanted to kno as the title suggests, how much more restrictive, if noticeable at all would a 2.5 inch dump pipe be compared to a 3inch dump pipeon a r34 gtt...

assuming from front pipe all the way back is 3 inches

stock turbo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on a stock turbo it would not effect it a great deal. im assuming a mean an aftermarket 2.5" dump which would still be a long way ahead of the OEM item.

moving to bigger turbos, perhaps even a hiflow, you may find it to hold back SOME power. I do stress the word SOME, the tomei expreme dump for evos is only 2.5" ID and has been used to 300 all wheel kw and more without restriction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on the stock turbo i can't see it making a world of difference, as long as you have junked the bs stock dump (wastegate gases exit and run into a WALL) you'll probably be right with the a/m 2.5"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i use a hks gt-rs turbo on 13psi and a full 3 inch exhust but stock standard dump pide. idono why thats how i got the car but im looking into changing it to a 3 inch dump. is thier much difference between the split dump pipe and the bell shape?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i use a hks gt-rs turbo on 13psi and a full 3 inch exhust but stock standard dump pide. idono why thats how i got the car but im looking into changing it to a 3 inch dump. is thier much difference between the split dump pipe and the bell shape?

There is lots of info on this forum. My summary is get a belmouth one, the split ones have caused boost creep issues and problems with the separate pipe fouling on things. Im not saying they all have this issue but there doesnt seem to be any advantage to getting a split one so why bother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

will 2.5inch aftermarket dump pipe even bolt onto a 3inch front pipe?

Should have same size flange, just different size pipe.

I have a similar question. Will a 2.5" cat-back be that much more restrictive than a 3"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats a different thing all together. the back of the turbo where gas exits is actually tiny, nowhere near 3", so having a 2.5" pipe come off that and then open up to a 3" is actually not so bad. having a complete 3" would be better but not the end of the world nor perhaps even noticable on a stock turbo.

with the 2.5" catback, it will hold back some power. the main contributor to power on a car sub 200kw is its dump and frontpipe. but keep in mind you would not want a harsh step down to a smaller diameter pipe from a bigger one, that creates big flow issues.

AFAIK stock GTR exhaust systems have been used to 285rwkw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He could just take the Bogan Cruise Ships setup... Already got a good setup, with blower, the auto was rebuilt too wasn't it? Perfect time for him to upgrade the tailshaft, diff, and axles...    And wouldn't need to waste money on redoing the Commos seats, as he could just buy race seats for the 5...   As a highly modded car he could avoid the ability to give it away to offspring too when they crash their cars...
    • It's really interesting how much it's moving left to right, and doesn't appear to be actually spreading. For this to be moving left to right, without flaring, means unequal forces being applied until equilibrium hits in one way or another.   Reasons it could be unequal; Piston sizes left to right are different sizes. Only minute differences. Pistons moving on different planes. That is, are they moving directly straight at each other, or slightly out of alignment. The fluid is restricted getting to one side.   Some tests you could do. Pull the bleeders on the left and right, fit each side with pressure gauges. It will allow you to make sure pressure is equal (and really, it should be as fluid flow is so damn low, so fluid flow dynamics shouldn't come into it).   With the calipers off the car, have both sides retracted as far as possible, measure very very accurately (think micrometre) distances between opposing pistons in four different spots per set of pistons. Firstly, on each opposing pistons pair, the measures on for different spots should be equal. If it's not, and especially if one spot appears to actually get closer compared to another, the pistons aren't aligned, and now the forces left to right won't be equal, as they're the forces fighting each other.   You can also pull all the pistons out, and very very accurately measure the diameter of them. If they're not equal left to ight in the pairings, and especially if the area of the pistons on one side is different to the area on the other overall, it'll all be out of whack.   My bet, is shit QC in making sure the pistons move in the same plane left vs right. Some minor out of square machining, and nothing will line up, things will want to move around.  
    • Whilst putting a V8 in a MX5 would be fun, it would negate the whole cheap to run fun daily that the MX5 will be used for If I wanted a faster little convertible I would have got a engine check light, I mean a BMW Z4 M, but going off the issues that the guy at work who recently got one is having, it is lucky I didn't  Meh, horses for courses, the Bogan Cruise Ship is my go to for some horse torques    
    • I reckon give him a few months, LSX swap would be good
    • Mark needs to get bored at work and order things on here...
×
×
  • Create New...