Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

thought I'd set up this project page and share the work a friend and me are doing on my car.

car is 33gtst spec2 with rebuilt RB25det engine with all the forged goodies. Did a recent compression test and it was spot on so its given me alot of security for my plans - namely fit Garrett GT3076 turbo top mount and get the best from it all in whichever way I can!!

so the main parts to fit so far to my car will be:

Garrett GT3076R ball bearing turbo

Top mount manifold from Owen Developments

Tial 44mm ext. wgate

Greddy GTR style plenum with Q45 throttle body

so this morning got up, breathed a bit, had breks, missus went pilates, I started whipping a few basic bits off the car - filter, afm, piping to turbo and things like that. Realised I were gonna get a bit stuck with various bits so I gave Ian a shout at about half 10, picked him up and he came over to gimme a hand removing the manifold and wotnot. Actually he ended up whipping the intake plenum upper half off (swine of a job even with rachet spanners but not impossible lol). At this point we realised that the plenum bolts underneath were quite loose which will have been the reason it was idling like a little swine (ie: all over the shop). Anyway onward!

Ian then went to work on the manifold. two bolts have snapped but shouldn't be agonising to take them off by welding a bolt on.

Got old manifold off then while the studs were there we decided to test fit the manifold, turbo and downpipe n wotnot. Its pretty darn close but there's a small issue or two to sort which I'm hoping wont be agonising.

anyway enough of my waffle, heres the cool bit - PICS!!!!!

Ians mittens test fitting the top mount manifold..

p1030507.jpg

you can see the T4 to T3 flange fitted on the manifold...

p1030508.jpg

p1030509.jpg

love this pic - its already taking shape hehehe...

p1030510.jpg

turbo was fouling against the power steering reservoir so unbolted it and moved it out the way slightly for the moment. Ian said a gtr one is a good swap and bolts nearer the front of the bay so I think I'll get one o those...

p1030511.jpg

p1030512.jpg

p1030513.jpg

here we got the wgate on...

p1030514.jpg

p1030515.jpg

We then got the downpipe on which mated to the four bolt flange on the back of the turbo in the pic above. It bolted nicely to the mid section of the exhaust and to the turbo but there seems to be a bit of an issue. The takeoff pipe from the ext wgate seems to not quiiiiiiite mate neatly to the wgate - we're tallking 3 blinking mm here bah!

p1030516.jpg

p1030517.jpg

p1030521.jpg

so plans now are to use the propane canister I bought today with the burner thingy and warm up the pipe then 'persuade it with a block of wood and hammer lol! It really doesn't need alot as you can see in the pics, but I'll take my time and make sure the pipe is super hot then knock it into shape. Need to speak to Chris @ Conceptua regarding tackling this.... or should I just blank off the hole and run a screamer pipe hehehe! :dance:

again massive thanks to Ian on here for coming over and helping me out - really appreciate it mate.

just need to get my old tub up for sale on here now :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/319926-my-gt3076-conversion/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...