Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have seen this in other places as well, supercheap to be exact, but it's what it says in the ryco booklet.

they say for the RB25DE(T) to have a Z442 or something if it's made after '98. and it is that much smaller (smaller than the one for my house-mates 2.2L camry engine).

now, i only have a R33, so i would be saying stick with the Z145A, which is what i use. and i would say that you should use the same for the R34 as well.

a larger filter should have a higher flow than a smaller one (based on larger cross-section of filter). so i would say that maybe the Z442 or whatever is more expensive and they are trying to get money out of you, or the guy just doesn't know what he's on about. but if anyone else can have some logic over why a smaller one would be better, i would like to hear it.

Hey mate,

I use a Z442 on my R34 RB25DET, Here in New Zealand the recommended filter for most rb's are the Z101 but the Z101 doesnt fit on the 25 on the 34's I cant remember exactally what it is but it hits on something so the smaller filter is perfect.

Dunno what the difference is but I would go for the one that's specific to your vehicle model why risk using something else?

RB30, RB20, RB26, RB26 all can use the Z145A oil filter.

Its a 3/4 thread oil filter.

The Z442 is the same kind of 3/4 oil filter but smaller, I use the Z442 on my R33 because I have an adapter that goes to the oil cooler, therefore a Z145A does not fit in there.

I would assume the larger oil filter is preferable...

the 34's use a slightly different filter cos there is something down there that fouls on some models

if its a 33, stick with the bigger filter, if its a 34, you can try a 33 filter and if it clears then use it cos they are cheaper and bigger = more surface area and flow/restriction

i've got a stagea with the neo motor and 4wd shiz and i've got the 33 filter on it

the 33 filter is also cheaper too

exactly what i was going to say, larger area means either more flow (which means less pressure is required to force the oil through the filter) or more filtration potential for the filter, or most likely a combination of the two.

interesting that they both fit. the bigger one has the potential to be better filter but as said above there may be situations where it doesn't work on the car.

i was given one of the bigger ones by someone who didn't know what he was doing at nissan (urgh) but it worked fine. sump plug washer i bought was way too big tho

  • 4 weeks later...
Ah I'm an idiot.

I use Z145a's on my 25 neo (in R32)

i know this is a bit late but it doesn't matter

both filters have the same dimensions on the face of the filter, the body is just a bit bigger on the 33 one which can foul on some 34 motors (but haven't heard of anyone having troubles)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
    • Short inlet runners cost quite a bit. Dulls off the off-boost torque, and delays boost onset, because arrival of boost is driven by gas flow is a product of the ability to flow air which is torque. This is the reason that the stock manifolds have longer runners. On a 3L, or bigger, you can usually accept the compromise of giving away some torque because the extra capacity gives you a little extra to waste. But on a smaller motor, there's not a lot there to start with. Example, I swapped RB20 out of my R32, 25NeoDET in its place. The "wall of torque" that I experienced afterwards made it all worthwhile. That's because I came from RB20 land where torque is not a thing. But I would not do anything, anything at all, to reduce the low/mid torque I have now, because I remember what it is like to not have it!
×
×
  • Create New...